1 / 49

Pudendal Canal Syndrome Overview

Pudendal Canal Syndrome Overview. Ahmed Shafik & Olfat El Sibai , MD , PhD Professors and Chairmen Department of Surgery & Experimental Research Faculty of Medicine, Cairo & Menoufia Universities Shafik’s Foundation for Science. Surgical anatomy of PN: (Shafik ,1995) S2 → upper cord

Antony
Télécharger la présentation

Pudendal Canal Syndrome Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pudendal Canal SyndromeOverview Ahmed Shafik & Olfat El Sibai, MD, PhD Professors and Chairmen Department of Surgery & Experimental Research Faculty of Medicine, Cairo& Menoufia Universities Shafik’s Foundation for Science

  2. Surgical anatomy of PN: (Shafik ,1995) • S2 → upper cord • S3 PN above SPL → lower cord • S4 pass behind SPL medial to ischial spine → pass between SPL + STL→ PC → branches: *IRN * Perineal n * Dorsal n of penis (clitoris)

  3. Presentation: 1- Proctalgia (Shafik, 1991& El-Sibai, 1996) 2- FI (Shafik, 1994) 3- FI in complete R prolapse (Shafik, 1994) 4- USI (Shafik, 1994) 5- ED (Shafik, & El-Sibai, 1995) 6- Scrotalgia (Shafik, 1993) 7- Prostatodynia (Shafik, 1998) 8- Vulvudynia (Shafik, 1997) 9- Interstitial cystitils (Shafik, 2008) 10- Ischemic proctitilis (Shafik, 1996) Pudendal canal syndrome: (Shafik,1991) PN compression in PC

  4. Mechanism of PCS On ↑↑straining at defecation or delivery → ↑ intra-abd.pr. → brunt on LA & anoccygeal raphe → LA sublaxation & sagging → pull on IRN → pull on PN → neuropraxia or axontmesis → PN entrapment neuropathy in PC by edemae & ischemia → motor & sensory manfestation of PCS

  5. Proctalgia: (Shafik, 1991 & El-Sibai 1996) - Abrupt, sharp pain in anal or perianal regions - Few to 30 mts - Intermittent, by day or night - Unrelated to defecation - Aggravated by sitting - 2-3 times / wk - Increasing frequency - Perineal numibness & tingling

  6. - Common in multiparous & difficult deliveries - ±assoc. with FI to soft stools or flatus - D/E: ▪ tenderness on pressing on PN ▪ peri-anal & peri-vulval hypo. or anesthesia ▪ absent anal reflex

  7. FI: (Shafik 1994) • - Females with multiple deliveries • - FI to stools and flatus • - alone or with SUI or in CRP • - ↓ anal pr. • - P. neuropathy by PCS→ IRN neurpthy.

  8. FI in CRP: (Shafik, 1994) • In CRP →↓ EMG activity of LA • Levator dysfunction ± primary cause of CRP • Sublaxated & sagged LA → pull on PN → • Continues LA activity → PN stretch & tramatization → neuropraxia or axontmesis → PN entrapment → IRN neuropathy → FI • PNTML prolonged

  9. USI: (Shafik,1994) • ↓ EMG activity of EUS & prolonged both latency of straining-urethral reflex & PNTML • ET is neurogenic→PCS Evidences : - Weak EUS - Prolonged latency of straining- urethr. reflex • Prolonged PNTML • Concomitant idiopath. FI • ↑ USI incidence with multiparous

  10. Erectile Dysfunction:(Shafik,1994, El-Sibai,1995) ▪ Excluded psycogenic, vasculogenic, hormonal & metabolic (dibetis M) ▪ ± Assoc. with penile pain • Absent nocturnal tumescence • Penile, perineal & scrotal hypo. or anesthesia • EMG: ↓ EUS, EAS & LA • ↑ PNTML

  11. Chronic constipation & ↑↑straining at defecation→↑intra-abd. pr.→ overstretch of LA → LA sublaxation & sagging→ pull on PN & artery →entrapment→dorsal N. of penis neuropathy→ ED

  12. Vulvudynia: (Shafik,1997) • Vulvur burning & introital dyspareunia of idiopathic cause with failed various trt. • Multiparous, assoc. with USI • Pain every 2-3ds. induced by coitus • Not related to defecation or urination • Crisis 2-4hs. • PN block diagnostic • Gyne.exam.→bilat. vulvar erythema & tenderness on pressing on PN • Valvar & perineal hyposthesia or anesthesia

  13. Beco et al, 2004 : • 74 female pts. with perineodynia (vulvudynia,perineal pain & proctalgia), FI & USI • PCD : - Significant improvement of symptoms & signs - ↓ PNTML - ↑ EMG activity of LA & EAS

  14. Scrotalgia:( Shafik,1993) • Scrotal pain alone or ± assoc. penile pain or ED • No testicular pathology (varicocele or infection) • P.H. of chronic constipation & ↑↑ straining at defecation • D/E: -tenderness on pressing on PN -hypo. or anesthesia of perineal area • ↓ EMG of LA &EAS & ↓ PNTML

  15. Prostatodynia: (Shafik,1998) • Pain in perineam & scrotum or anal canal • Continuous with exacerbation or intermittent • Dull aching ,not related to urination or defecation • Assoc. with frequency, urgency & dysuria • Prostatic secretion → no bacteria

  16. No improvement with antibiotic • P.H. chronic constipation & ↑↑ straining • Perineal hyposthesia & weak anal reflex • EMG ↓ activity of LA & EUS, normal EAS • PNTML ↑ • PN block → diagnostic & therapeutic test

  17. IRN → supplies EAS,LA & m.m. of ↓1/2 of AC & perinanal skin Perineal N.→ EUS Mechanism: Constipation & straining → LA sublaxation & sagging → pull on PN → stretch distal part of PN at winding around SPligmt.→ neuropraxia & axontmesis *Subsequant N.compression → PN ischemia→N. damage *P.neuropathy involves perineal N & to a lesser extent IRN

  18. Interstitial Cystitis : (Shafik 2008) - Pain suprapubic,pubic,vaginal & genital - Exacerbated by intercourse or ejaculation - Exam. → suprapubic & vag. wall tenderness - Common in ♀ & IC most common cause of pelvic pain in gyne. - Remission & relapse

  19. - UB innervated by pelvic hypogastric/lumbar splanchnic innerv. Lumbosacral afferent in pelvic & PN sense & regulate continence & micturition - PN commonly compressed by PC or by sacral ligmts. clamp - PN entrapment → P neuritis → PCS - Painful micturition & dysparuma are symptoms of genital & perineal n. involvement of PN.

  20. Pudendal Artery SyndromePresenting as Ischemic ProctitisReport of 3 cases (Shafik,DigSurg 1996): • Not in literature • Anal pain,bleeding &P.H. of stainodynia+PCS • D/E→AC tender,edematous & ulcerated • R &C →free • Biopsy: mucosa lost,submuc.edem.& RC infiltration • D :selective pudendal arteriography → obliterated distal part(PC),not visualized IRA

  21. Et :→ L sublaxation & sagging →pull on artery & nerve in→arteritis & neuropathy • TRT: PCD →release PN & IPA • PO : - symptoms disappear - healing of AC - IPA remains obliterated but improvement is due to release of collateral vess. From compression

  22. Diagnosis: ▪ C/E: ● P.H. of straining ● PCS symptoms ● D/E: -tenderness on pressing on PN -perianal or perineal hypo.or anesthesia ▪ ↓ AC pr. ▪ ↓ anal reflex ▪ ↓ EMG of LA & EAS or EUS ▪ ↑ PNTML

  23. Pudendal nerve decompression: Technique : Anterior approach. ▪ Lithotomy position • Vertical para-anal incision 2cm from A orifice ▪ Ischio-rectal fossa entered ▪ IRN identified across IRF,N hooked by finger & traced to PN in PC ▪ PC fasciotomy ▪ Same procedure on the other side

  24. PND :Posterior app roach(Shafik,1992) • Technique : • Pt. in jack knife position • Vertical para-sacral skin incision • Glut. max. exposed & divided • Triangle identified • PN & vess. are over sacrospinous lig. passing from GSF to LSF • PC fasciotomy & PN releasad • Glut. Max. repaired • Op. repeated on the other side

  25. ● Indication: recurrent PCS ● PO follow up monthly for 6 mth.,every 3 mth. for 14-18 mth.by→ PNTML, EMG & manometry ● PO complications : minimal.

  26. Role of Sacral LigamentClampPudendal Neuropathy (PCS):Result Of Clamp Release(Shfik,2007) • This study showed the cause of PND failure in P neuropathy in the 21 pts. not improved after PCD • Clinical & investigative results improved after SLC release in 80.9% • PN sensory & motor affection improved & points that PN was involved SpL clamp in 80.9%

  27. Failure to improve SL division release PN from compression in SLC • after PCD & improved after SLC release in 17 pts. denotes that PN was affected by SLC • PN compression could be in both SLC & PC

  28. In our study PCS, of 206 cases it occurred in only 21 pts. (10.2%) • This assumed to be due to : (a)- anatomical anomaly of Sp. L & St. L, so narrowing the space between them. (b)- The sharp edge of SPL traumatize PN while passing over it.

  29. Technique of sacral ligament clamp release: • PCD→ anterior approach • Vertical para-anal incision • IRF entered • IRN identified & followed laterally to PN in PC • Verify previous operation (PN free) • Ischial spine & SPL. identified • PN dorsal to SPL. & between SPL. &STL.& enter PC

  30. ■ SPL- overlaying coccygeous m.→ divided at ischial spine by tenotomy knife & releasing PN free ■ Wound loosely closed ■ Op. repeated on other side

  31. Improvement of 80.9% of cases after sacral ligament clamp release, denotes that PN is traumatized not only in PC but also in SLC The cause of non improvement of 19.1% of cases after SLC release is due to advanced irreversible PN damage. Non improvement : - faulty diagnosis - irreversible PN damage Further studies needed

  32. Conclusion ● PCD is effective & successful procedure in treating motor & sensory manifestation of PCS; perineodynia (proctalgia, perineal pain & vulvudynia), FI, USI, ED & ischemic proctitis. ● The anterior approach is easier less time consuming. The posterior approach is indicated in recurrent cases ● PN compressed by: 1- PC commonly 2-Sacral ligments. Clamp

  33. Thank You and Thanks to Ahmed Shafik

More Related