1 / 23

Professional Graphics CGW Webinar

Professional Graphics CGW Webinar. Evolution of Professional Graphics Yesterday’s Landscape. Pro graphics distinguished from consumer/corporate graphics by most every metric Vendor, chips, boards, bus, memory, video I/O, OS, middleware/APIs, usage, performance, price

Audrey
Télécharger la présentation

Professional Graphics CGW Webinar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Professional GraphicsCGW Webinar

  2. Evolution of Professional GraphicsYesterday’s Landscape • Pro graphics distinguished from consumer/corporate graphics by most every metric • Vendor, chips, boards, bus, memory, video I/O, OS, middleware/APIs, usage, performance, price • Excusive domain of Traditional Proprietary Workstation (TPW) vendors • Sgi, Sun, HP, DEC and IBM drove the innovation • Proprietary UNIX/VMS were the only OSes

  3. Evolution of Professional GraphicsToday’s Landscape • Hardware migration from “in-house” to IHV • IHVs are vertical: chips and AIBs • TPW vendors no longer build graphics chips • Enable IHV hardware with drivers for proprietary Unix • A few unique high-end board configurations • Gaming is driving innovation • E.g. programmable shaders, floating-point precision • Even $1K+ multi-board monsters: Alienware and Nvidia’s SLI • Much harder to distinguish from consumer AIBs • Cost premium has dropped considerably

  4. Graphics Hardware DifferentiationProfessional vs. Consumer • Brand • Reliability • ISV certification • Customer support • Breadth of driver support • OpenGL ICDs • 64-bit Linux and Windows drivers • Performance and price can be a low priority • Legacy requirements can sustain lagging hardware

  5. Graphics Hardware DifferentiationProfessional vs. Consumer • Remaining GPU differences artificial and/or minor • (Virtually) no difference in “raw” die • Nvidia and ATI lead with same GPU/VPUs from consumer line • relatively minor driver, package and or board-exposed features • Board-level differences significant at high-end only • Value varies by application • Physical memory • DCC and vis-sim have never-ending appetite for textures • Display support optimized for pro applications • Framelock, genlock, interface type (e.g. SDI) • Number and datarate of video interfaces • Ultra-high resolution (e.g. dual dual-link for up to 9 Mpixel displays)

  6. 2003 Professional Graphics Hardware Market • Nearly 2.1 million professional graphics AIBs sold • Almost $1B in revenue • Legacy “in-house” graphics from TPW vendors small but significant • Only 5% of units shipped, but 16% of revenue • Incremental opportunity for IHVs • Units are in the low-end, but revenue is in the mid-range

  7. JPR Pro Graphics AIB Classes

  8. Vendor Profile • 5% (units) and 11% (revenue) share in 2003 • but 26% and 44% unit share in high and ultra-high • Pro Gfx flagship: Realizm • What sets Realizm apart • Exclusive focus on professional apps • Chip-level scalability • 16-bit FP format in frame buffer • Virtual, paged video memory • Where 3DLabs is going • Fighting hard to keep high-end dominance • Largest physical memory, Multi-chip AIBs, Genlock / framelock • Realizm trickle-down to mid-range and low-end?

  9. Vendor Profile • 17% (units) and 15% (revenue) share in 2003 • Unbranded presence in “2D” applications • Pro graphics flagship: Fire GL 7100 • What sets Fire GL apart • A strong mid-range focus (31%) • Subjective edge in quality and quality/performance • Perf/W has won mobile and embedded sockets • ATI dominant in mobile workstations (67%) • Where ATI is going • Best positioned to ride growth in mobile workstation • Can it (should it) ignore high end of market?

  10. Vendor Profile • JPR estimates* 9% (units) and 11% (revenue) share in 2003 • But ~17% in “2D” segment • Slanted heavily toward direct sales • Not directly targeting “power renderers” • Appeal on basis of image quality and specific, niche features • Where is Matrox going? • Road ahead looks difficult in keeping pace on GPUs • Last major introduction, Parhelia, was out in May 2002 • Move to programmable shaders and floating-point requires overhaul • Some key competitive advantages going away • More “2D” competition from Nvidia, ATI and maybe soon IGPs • Fewer areas of differentiation, e.g. super-high res (9 Mpixel) • OEM presence declining • Continued focus on custom-fit solutions for large customers * Matrox is private and does not disclose financials

  11. Vendor Profile • 67% (units) and 47% (revenue) share in 2003 • Pro gfx flagship: Quadro FX 4000 (NV40 GPU) • What sets Nvidia apart • Breadth of offerings, entry to ultra-high end • Shader Model 3.0 vs. 2.0 • SLI: Board level scalablity • Custom offerings for DCC, vis-sim • Where Nvidia is going • Trying to take share in existing segments • From 3Dlabs in the high/ultra-high end • Think margin, not units • Sales synergy • From ATI in the mobile space (MXM and Axiom) • Getting GPUs into new segments, like render farms

  12. Pro Graphics Technology Trends • Final stage of migration to fully programmable architecture • Richer, “cleaner” programming: large code, predication, branching • Changing how graphics hardware vendors will compete • Leveraging parallelism • Today’s flagship GPUs: 6 vertex and 16 pixel pipelines (ATI/Nvidia) • Chip-level (3DLabs) and Board-level (Nvidia) scalability • Continuing to “annex” upstream processing • Physics, kinematics, simulation, animation, tessellation • Vehicle for general purpose computing (GPGPU), • Why Intel’s biggest threat may someday be not AMD but Nvidia • Floating-point precision • GDDR3 memory

  13. PCI Express for Graphics • Serial, point-to-point, packets • More a network interconnect than a traditional I/O bus • Variable number of “lanes” • Graphics design center: 16-lane • More bandwidth, but remember: • Directionally constrained: 4GB/s up, 4GB/s down • In-band command, control and packet overhead reduces bw • Just in time to carry the load • Most apps on most hardware today not constrained by AGP 8X • Some may be … it all depends • HD video editing • Hybrid CPU/GPU render for DCC Src: PCI-SIG

  14. PCI Express Graphics AIBs • Form factor derived from PCI • Power budgets • 10W: ×1 cards (<= 6.6” length) • 25W: ×1 cards (> 7.0” length), ×4 cards, ×8 cards, ×16 low-profile graphics and ×16 server I/O • 75W: full-height graphics cards • High-end Graphics Spec will allow auxiliary power for up to 150W Src: PCI-SIG

  15. PCI Express Connectors • “Up-plugging” allowed • OEMs encouraged to support wider connectors • Link width not determined by connector or interface, negotiated at config time • More end-user flexibility • Allows dual high-bw (≥ AGP 8X) graphics AIBs Src: PCI-SIG

  16. GPU Interfaces to PCI ExpressTo bridge or not to bridge • Initial plans spurred some mud-slinging • ATI planned all native PCIe interfaces • Nvidia indicated plans to bridge with on-board HSI (“AGP 16X”) • 3DLabs’ Realizm depends on configuration • In the end, it will most likely be a non-issue • Speedup of full-speed PCIe interface is exception and debatable • ATI will likely bridge back to AGP • HSI does not preclude native PCIe – NV45 is out already • 3DLabs likely to fill in low-end PCIe offerings, too • Dell should ship Nvidia and ATI PCIe AIBs July, 3DLabs later this quarter

  17. Pro Graphics Market Trend Forecast • Strong growth in Mobile Workstations • Final phase in transition to all-IHV graphics • AIBs configured for specific applications • Genlock and SDI for DCC studio apps • Framelock for vis-sim and wall-display applications • IGPs for pro graphics? Never say never. • What about Grantsdale for “2D workstation” apps? • Why Nvidia/ATI/3DLabs’s biggest competitor may someday be Intel • GPUs to final frame rendering?

  18. Nvidia’s Application-specific AIB Configurations Nvidia Quadro FX 4000 SDI I/O Nvidia Quadro FX 3000G I/O

  19. GPUs in the Render Farm? • Graphics hardware is absent in the render farm • ISVs/IHVs looking to final-frame speedup as well • Enablers • Primary: advent of programmable hardware shaders with compilers • Secondary: FP color precision, more flexible programming (larger code, predication, branching) • Nvidia Gelato, Mental Images’ Mental Ray 3.3 • Vendors would welcome 10K’s of incremental professional GPUs • Not a slam-dunk • Global illumination, raycasting techniques (e.g raytracing and volume rendering) don’t map very well (at least not yet) to GPUs

  20. Technology ForecastImpact of Longhorn • Image quality • Gamma, sRGB, 32-bit FP, Text enhancements • Virtualization to support Avalon, “Presentation Manager” • Virtual memory, mostly under OS/driver interaction • GPU: “Hyper Threading”-like context management • Pixel rates will be especially stressed • Lots of temporary textures, surfaces to be warped, composited, blended • Dual, cascaded vertex shaders • Moving to (optional) programmable hardware tessellation • Security & stability • simpler drivers, hang prevention • OpenGL ICDs should be upgraded for Longhorn (but not required)

  21. Windows Graphics FoundationLonghorn and Beyond Src: Microsoft, WinHEC 2004

  22. Backup Slides

  23. Hardware Differentiation vs. Consumer Disappearing

More Related