1 / 17

City of Sugar Land Intersection Safety Study

City of Sugar Land Intersection Safety Study. City of Sugar Land Intersection Safety Study. H-GAC/City Partnership Engineering, PW & SLPD participation 12 intersections throughout the City Data covering 2002 to 2005 Consultant: RS&H: Dena Jackson, P.E. Completed: May 2006.

Ava
Télécharger la présentation

City of Sugar Land Intersection Safety Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. City of Sugar LandIntersection Safety Study

  2. City of Sugar LandIntersection Safety Study • H-GAC/City Partnership • Engineering, PW & SLPD participation • 12 intersections throughout the City • Data covering 2002 to 2005 • Consultant: RS&H: Dena Jackson, P.E. • Completed: May 2006

  3. Sugar Land Background • Population 1991: 25,000 +/- 2007: < 80,000 • Traffic Signals Operated by City 1995: 0 2007: 72

  4. City Council Goals • Mobility for People - SLPD policies to facilitate traffic movement - Traffic Control Center (remote operations/observations) • Safest City in Area - H-GAC statistics (crashes/100m VMT: 1999 – 2001) Texas 149 H-GAC 8 Co. Area 204 Sugar Land 192 - Access Management Practices - LOS requirements

  5. Methodology of Study • Data Collection • Existing Condition Analysis • Crash Data Analysis • Identify Safety Improvement Countermeasures • Benefit/Cost Analysis • Public Outreach

  6. How do you measure? • Distractions: Phones, TM, radios, etc. • Frustration level • School zone factor • Dynamics of growth: Population, employment, new roads, etc.

  7. Intersections Studied • Williams Trace at Lexington • Williams Trace at S. Parkway • Sweetwater at Town Center S. • Sweetwater at Lexington • Sweetwater at Greystone • Dulles Ave. at Broodmoor Drive

  8. Intersections Studied (cont’d) • Dulles Ave. at Avenue E • Dulles Ave. at Lexington Blvd. • Eldridge Road at Florence • Eldridge Road at West Airport • S.H. 6 at Town Center Blvd. N. • S.H. 6 at Lexington Blvd.

  9. Insert Figure 0.1

  10. Why these Corridors?Corridor Crash Risk(per 100m VMT) • Williams Trace Blvd. 284 • Sweetwater Blvd. 444 • Dulles Avenue 426 • Eldridge Road 341 • S.H. 6 910 Source: SLPD collision reports, June 2002 – June 2005

  11. Primary Observations • 4 years, 12 intersections, 278 accidents • 40 - 78% of accidents/intersection involved rear end collisions • 35% of crashes involved student drivers • 15 accidents involving commercial vehicle • 1 pedestrian fatality: outside of a x-walk • 1 bicyclist involved: failed to yield ROW

  12. General Recommendations • Increase Enforcement • Implement New Signal Timing Plans • Median modifications • Add Capacity (thru & turn lanes) • Address congestion along S.H. 6 Congestion~ FRUSTRATION~ Accidents

  13. Opening of U.S. 59 Expansion (S.H. 6 to U.S. 90A) Number of accidents reduced at studied intersections along perpendicular corridors: Street20032005% reduced Dulles Ave. 21 6 71.4 Williams Trace 11 5 54.5 S.H. 6 32 24 25.0

  14. S.H. 6 Corridor • Turn lane additions • Closure of channelized median • Between Lexington and Town Center North • 23 accidents in 12 months • Allows for ext. of LTL’s at signalized intersections • Need to address SH 6 congestion

  15. Implementation of Recommendations • Turn Lanes completed & planned • Continued enforcement • Signal timing customized to day of the week, time of day, conditions, season, etc. with real time changes • Enforcement

  16. What’s Next? • Continue to observe and be responsive • RLC’s at 4 intersections in December • Incident Management - More traffic cameras planned - Congestion Index for arterials • Way finding signage for CBD • Intra-City Transit Study planned • SH 6 Access Management Study • Bypass for S.H. 6: University Blvd.

  17. Questions

More Related