1 / 13

Reflecting on Nature: Plumwood and Naess

Herein lies a overview of Unit 1 with emphasis on the selections from Plumwood and Naess

BrianGlenney
Télécharger la présentation

Reflecting on Nature: Plumwood and Naess

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Images of Nature Section 1: Reflecting on Nature

  2. Nature as opposition to humanity • Lynn White’s interpretation of modern Christianity. • Aristotle

  3. Humanity as part of nature. • Lynn White’s revolution for modern Christianity. • St. Francis of Assisi. • Plumwood • Carson • Thoreau • Leopold

  4. Humanity as dominant over nature to care for nature for humanity’s benefit. • DeWitt • Locke • Mill • [Botkin*] *Due to humanity already using technology to pollute nature.

  5. Humanity as wholly integrated with nature with full connectedness • Shiva • Naess (deep ecology)

  6. Naess: Deep Ecology • The well-being and flourishing of human and nonhuman life on Earth have value in themselves independent of the usefulness of the nonhuman world for human purposes. • Richness and diversity of life forms contribute to these values. • Humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital human needs. • The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantial decrease of the human population. • Present human interference with the nonhuman world is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening. • Policies must therefore be changed. These policies affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures. The resulting state of affairs will be deeply different from the present. • The ideological change is mainly that of appreciating life quality (not standard of length of life).

  7. Objection from Botkin • Deep ecology undermines the unique contribution humanity has made to the environment via technology. We must not reduce technology, but increase its prevalence. • Zizek Agrees! (2:50-4:30)

  8. Hints of the problem in Plumwood • …and Mick Fanning

  9. Is humanity just a part of nature? • We must choose a lens by which we view all things in our ethical view: human and non-human. • Which lens is justified? • Human? • Sentience? • Flourishing? • Creation? • Which lens is possible for humans?

  10. Summary: Anthrocentrism vs. Ecocentrism • Anthrocentrism: Humanity is privileged in its view of all other living things. • Ecocentrism: Humanity is NOT privileged in its view of all other living things. “Life” is privileged.

More Related