1 / 45

Computer Access Patti Drescher CESA 7 pdrescher@cesa7.k12.wi Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative wati

ASNAT Assessing Student’s Needs for Assistive Technology. Computer Access Patti Drescher CESA 7 pdrescher@cesa7.k12.wi.us Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative www.wati.org. Objectives.

Gabriel
Télécharger la présentation

Computer Access Patti Drescher CESA 7 pdrescher@cesa7.k12.wi Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative wati

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ASNAT Assessing Student’s Needs for Assistive Technology Computer AccessPatti DrescherCESA 7pdrescher@cesa7.k12.wi.usWisconsin Assistive Technology Initiativewww.wati.org

  2. Objectives Participants will understand the SETT process as it relates to identifying appropriate AT for students who need to access the computer. Participants will have basic knowledge of the AT continuum for Computer Access as identified in the ASNAT Computer Access Chapter. Participants will be able to access resources and tools for trial with students who need AT computer access supports.

  3. Introduction • 2009 ASNAT revision(Assessing Students’ Need for Assistive Technology) • Uses the SETT framework for AT assessments Student Environment Tasks Tools • Framework developed by Joy Zabala 2002 • http://sweb.uky.edu/~jszaba0/SETTUPDATE.PDF • Implementation Plan & Follow-up added by WATI • Revised version has added Sensory Considerations

  4. Using the SETT framework • “Traditional” SETT • The Student • Identify the functional area(s) of concern? • Special needs (related to area of concern) • Current abilities (related to area of concern) • What does the student need to communicate that is difficult or impossible to do independently at this time?

  5. Using the SETT framework • The Environment(s) • Arrangement (instructional, physical) • Support (available to both the student and the staff) • Materials and Equipment (commonly used by others in the environments) • Access Issues (technological, physical, instructional) • Attitudes and Expectations (staff, family, others)

  6. Using the SETT framework • The Tasks • What SPECIFIC tasks occur in the student’s natural environments that enable progress toward mastery of IEP goals and objectives? • What SPECIFIC tasks are required for active involvement in identified environments? (related to communication, instruction, participation, productivity, environmental control)

  7. Using the SETT framework • The Tools • Tools include devices, services and strategies… everything that is needed to help the student succeed. • Describe what a useful system of assistive technology devices and services for the student would be like. • Brainstorm Tools that could be included in a system that addresses student needs. • Select the most promising Tools for trials in the natural environments. • Plan the specifics of the trial (expected changes, when/how tools will be used, cues, etc.) • Collect data on effectiveness. (Zabala 2002)

  8. Using the SETT process Decision Making Guide WATI’s version of the SETT Framework for Computer Access. Guide will be Different for every area of AT assessment

  9. Using the Student Information Guide in the SETT Process • The Guide is intended to help the team discuss key issues when assessing the need for AT for a specific student. • It helps teams consider whole child & environment & not “jump” to a device! • It is a group (sped, reg. ed, support staff, admin., parent, student) process in which everyone contributes. • Important to write on a large format so that everyone can see, edit, remember (shared group memory), stay focused, and be informed! • Team members take roles of: Facilitator, Recorder, Time Keeper

  10. Assistive Technology for Computer Access The Student

  11. Student List the functional areas of concern What are the student’s special needs related to the area of concern. What are the student’s abilities…. What motivates the student? Other questions you might ask?

  12. Assistive Technology for Computer Access The Environment

  13. Environmental Considerations What specific environmental considerations need to be addressed? Obstacles? Supports? Attitudes of others? What are other the environments that need to be taken into account?

  14. Sensory Considerations (new) New section as a subset of Student & Environment • Does this student have sensory deficits or sensitivities that will impact his/her ability to access the computer? • Do the learning environment(s) impact the sensory issues of the student?

  15. Sensory Considerations • Visual clutter • Fluorescent lighting versus full spectrum lighting • Classroom and background noise • Tactile stimulation • Awareness of physical space • Other individual specific sensitivities

  16. Assistive Technology for Computer Access The Task

  17. Tasks to Consider • What does the student need to do to achieve educational goals from their IEP and be an active participant in their environment? • What are other students doing in the same environments?

  18. As a team, identify by circling or other means those few tasks the student needs to do that will have the most impact. Narrowing the Focus

  19. Solution Generation: Tools/Strategies As a team, brainstorm and write on chart paper any assistive technologies &/or strategies you think will assist the student in successfully completing those tasks you identified. • Brainstorm possible AT • Don’t evaluate (yet)! • Remember to include AT that the student already uses • Use all resources including people

  20. Assistive Technology for Computer Access The Tools

  21. AT Continuum • Follow the progression of low tech, through mid tech to high tech when selecting assistive technology tools

  22. Assistive Technology: past and present • Part of the Student’s past & current environment

  23. AT for Computer Access • Positioning of student and equipment • Adjustable table/chair • Position of keyboard • Wrist rest/support

  24. AT for Computer Access • Operating System Built in Accessibility Features • StickyKeys • FilterKeys • MouseKeys • Visual Display Options

  25. AT for Computer Access • Standard Keyboard Adaptations • Repeat Rate • Keyguards • Labels • Moisture Guard • Pointing Tools • Keyboard Mask

  26. AT for Computer Access • Standard Mouse Adaptations • Customizable Mouse Options • Button Reassignment

  27. AT for Computer Access • Rate Enhancement • Abbreviation Expansion • Word Prediction/Completion • Macros • Auto Correction

  28. AT for Computer Access • Alternative Keyboard • ABC • Dvorak • Ergonomic • One Handed • Wireless • Miniature/Compact • Programmable • OnScreen

  29. AT for Computer Access • Mouse Alternatives • Keyboard Shortcuts • Mouse Keys • Left Handed/Ergonomic • Wireless • One Button • Touchpad/trackpad • Trackball • Joystick

  30. AT for Computer Access • Mouse Alternatives (cont.) • Touchscreen • Foot-controlled • Head Controlled • Dwell Selection

  31. AT for Computer Access • Speech Recognition • Considerations • Speech • Cognitive abilities • Dictation skills • Literacy/Editing • Motivation • Support

  32. AT for Computer Access • Speech Recognition (cont.) • Built into PC and Mac Operating Systems • Dragon NaturallySpeaking (www.nuance.com) • SpeakQ (www.wordq.com)

  33. AT for Computer Access • Eye Gaze • Morse Code

  34. AT for Computer Access • Switch Access • Last alternative • Determine switch site • Use motivating activity

  35. AT for Computer Access • Modes of Scanning • Automatic • Single Switch Step • Two Switch Step • Inverse

  36. AT for Computer Access • Characteristics of Switches • Size • Sensitivity • Texture • Pressure • Feedback • Mounting

  37. AT for Computer Access • Types of Switches • Mechanical • Push • Light Touch Switch • Lever • Motoric-Specific Movement • Pneumatic • Dual • Wireless

  38. AT for Computer Access • Types of Switches (cont.) • Electrical • Proximity • Fiber Optic • Infrared • Sensor • Wheelchair Integration

  39. AT for Computer Access • Switch Interface • Mounting • Switch Accessible Software

  40. Solution Selection: Tools & Strategies • Review the list of potential tools • Now is the time to evaluate for a match with: • Student (abilities, difficulties, likes/dislikes) • Environment (supports, obstacles) • Tasks (what 1-2 things do you want the student to do?) • Prioritize selections

  41. Implementation Plan • Very Important! This is often where it breaks down! • Write down on the group chart (for top priorities) • Who is going to do… (get specific) • What (ditto) • When (do I need to say it again?) • For how long? • Write down your expectations (objectives) so you know if the AT is working or not! • Give everyone a job

  42. Follow-up Plan • Before the meeting is over, plan the follow-up • For accountability • We are all busy, so plan it now! • Bring list from original meeting so group can review who, what, when, & expectations

  43. Tools Resources Vendors for Computer Access Tools AbleNet www.ablenetinc.com Enabling Devices www.enablingdevices.com Don Johnston, Inc. www.donjohnston.com Infogrip www.infogrip.com IntelliTools www.intellitools.com RJ Cooper www.rjcooper.com Madentec www.madentec.com Nuance www.nuance.com

  44. Conclusion • It’s not about the technology/device- it’s about matching the Student, the Environment and the Task with the best Tool • Finally some research about using technology……. • …using technology for compensatory intervention actually also provides remedial benefits (Silver-Pacuilla, H., Ruedel K. & Mistrett, S. p. 8).

  45. References Resources • Silver-Pascuilla, H., Ruedel, K. & Mistrett, S. (2004). A review of technology based approaches for reading instruction: Tools for researchers and vendors. In National Center for Technology Integration: Reading Matrix. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from http://www.nationaltechcenter.org/matrix/default.asp • WATI (2009). Assessing Students’ Needs for Assistive Technology Chapter 4: Computer Access. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. http://www.wati.org

More Related