1 / 23

薬癮戒治社會心理復健模式之發展與評估

薬癮戒治社會心理復健模式之發展與評估. 鄭瑞隆教授. 感謝行政院衞生署 食品薬物管理局 科技委託研究. 鄭瑞隆教授 國立中正大學犯罪防治學系主任兼所長. 藥物濫用成因. Personality of abusers Stress & frustration factors Family factors Schooling factors Social & cultural factors. Personality factor. Poor self-image & concept Poor frustration tolerance

Télécharger la présentation

薬癮戒治社會心理復健模式之發展與評估

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 薬癮戒治社會心理復健模式之發展與評估 • 鄭瑞隆教授

  2. 感謝行政院衞生署食品薬物管理局科技委託研究感謝行政院衞生署食品薬物管理局科技委託研究 • 鄭瑞隆教授 • 國立中正大學犯罪防治學系主任兼所長

  3. 藥物濫用成因 • Personality of abusers • Stress & frustration factors • Family factors • Schooling factors • Social & cultural factors

  4. Personality factor • Poor self-image & concept • Poor frustration tolerance • Impulsivity control problem & irrationality • Traumatic reaction: depression & anxiety • Avoidance & fear • Addict prone personality

  5. Stress & frustration • Coming from daily lives • Inconsistent parental discipline • Poor family economy • Traumatic childhood experiences • Family disharmony & disorganization • Failure in schooling

  6. Family factors • Dispute & conflict among family members • Broken family structure • Inappropriate discipline • Alienation from families • Poor attachment with parents

  7. Family factors • Poor family economy • Lack of healthy leisure activities • Victimization within family • Witnessing drug abuse in family

  8. Schooling factors • Low or dissatisfactory academic achievement • Negative relationships with teachers & peers • School dropouts or loitering • Violation to school regulation • Allured by drug dealers & curiosity • Limited prevention education of drug abuse

  9. Social & cultural factors • Negative social learning & different association, e.g., smoking & gang activities • Negative socialization • Unhealthy leisure activities & pleasure seeking • Influenced by lower class culture • Associated with deviant social behaviors, e.g., gambling, prostitution, wrong means to revitalization • Associated with organized crimes & gang activities

  10. Purpose of research • Comprehensive exploration to various factors • Programming the experimental intervention • Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial intervention

  11. Method of research • Construction of psychosocial intervention program • Identification of the criteria for effectiveness evaluation • Bio-psycho-social assessment • Administering group therapy • Individual interviews & home visitations • Comprehensive evaluation of treatment effectiveness

  12. Participants of research • 12 drug addicts receiving pending prosecution, with one female, 11 males, one amphetamine combining heroin addict, 11 heroin addicts • Recruiting from outpatients at Veteran Hospital of Chia-Yi • Group leaders: Psychiatrist (MD), Clinical social worker, Clinical psychologist • Researchers & observers

  13. Instruments of data collection • Back depression inventory • Family life satisfaction inventory • Table of dosage change of methadone consumption • Observation records by the observers • Recidivism follow-up checklist

  14. Data analysis • Comparing with the norm of BDI • Comparing the means difference (t-test) • Analyzing verbatim qualitatively, including data from individual interviews and family visitations • Analyzing data from field observation • Analyzing changes of methadone consumption

  15. Findings of research • Two of the subjects dropped out, ten of them stayed • Six of the stayed subjects consumed same or lesser dosages of methadone • Most of the stayed subjects demonstrated same or better life satisfaction • Job hunting still being a big problem

  16. Findings of research • Motivational interviews are essential • Comprehensive bio-psycho-social assessment are necessary

  17. Findings of research • Medical treatment, psycho-counseling, social work casement management & family intervention are necessary • Vocational guidance, social & family ties are very critical

  18. Motivational interviews • May be set as the first priority, since no motivation, no change • Individualized interviews encouraging the clients' aspiration for change • Good resources allocating to motivated clients

  19. Comprehensive assessment • Bio-chemical tests, building up the baseline information for treatment • Providing essential medical treatment for the addicts in addition to methadone alternative medication, for example, anti-depressants, anti-impulsivity prescription. • Personality trait, social relations, family relations • Peer relations, career exploration, job preference, job training, & job matching

  20. Treatment action • Case management, social work individual & group treatment, psychiatric & psychological treatment, & family treatment • Sufficient professional staffing, concrete job description, collaboration among resource institutes, & adequate salaries & morale being critical for the success of psychosocial treatment

  21. Conclusion • Bio-psycho-social assessment & intervention are promising in concordance with methadone alternative treatment

  22. Auxiliary assistance to maintain the effectiveness & continuation of hanging on the treatment are necessary for successful psycho-social intervention.

  23. Thank you

More Related