1 / 25

National Culture

National Culture. Management Scientists are Humans Greet Hofstede , Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, January 1994, pp. 4-13. Outline. Why Culture and Management? Hofstede ’ s Method The Four Dimensions Later Refinements Trompenaars (1996) ’ s seven dimensions.

MikeCarlo
Télécharger la présentation

National Culture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Culture Management Scientists are Humans Greet Hofstede, Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, January 1994, pp. 4-13.

  2. Outline • Why Culture and Management? • Hofstede’s Method • The Four Dimensions • Later Refinements • Trompenaars (1996)’s seven dimensions

  3. Why Culture and Management? • Managers are humans and exist in cultures • They make decisions, have rituals, heroes, and use and understand symbols. • Hence they must be influenced by something other than mere instinct or biology

  4. “Culture” • Patterns of thinking, feeling and acting • Mental software, “Software of the Mind.” • Source is social environments, almost certainly from childhood • Culture is learned, not inherited

  5. Behavior Knowledge Opinions Personal Definition Attitudes Beliefs Malleability Values Parents Peers, Heroes Relationships Experience Experience Reality Concept Ladder

  6. Symbols Heroes Practices Rituals Values Hofstede’s View of Culture

  7. Hofstede’s Question • What are the components of culture, a small set of dimensions or characteristics, that enable us to classify culture-in-the-large (at a national level)? And do nations differ and can they be clustered into culturally-similar nations?

  8. Hofstede’s Method • Late 60s, questionnaires were distributed to thousands of IBM employees worldwide. • They answered the questions about work modes, methods, and meanings on desirable and desired situations and characteristics • The results were subjected to factor analysis. • Questions were based on prior work on culture by Inkeles and Levinson (a sociologist and psychologist)

  9. Factor Analysis • Goal is to reduce, statistically, the number of dimensions it takes to describe a phenomenon completely while losing as little information as possible. • The following example shows how factor analysis would reduce what looks like a two dimensional distribution to only one dimension:

  10. How Much Money are you worth? How OLD are you? Age+Wealth=? Age and Worth are closely related, so much so that if you know one, you can estimate the other…

  11. In other words, there is only ONE dimension called “agewealth” that captures most of the information about both. The red lines indicate the errors that using one dimension brings about. The longer the sum of these lines, the less well one dimension captures these two dimensions Age+Wealth=ONE Dimension

  12. The Four Dimensions • Power-Distance • Uncertainty Avoidance • Masculinity • Individualism • And a fifth was added later… • Time Orientation (Was Confucius Value)

  13. Interpreting the Dimensions • Range is generally 0 to 100, although some countries were surveyed later and hence ended up with scores > 100* • Mean value is 50; consider the standard deviation to be about 15, so the bulk of countries are between 35 and 65. • Hofstede was more interested in ranks rather than ratings; he later grouped countries in several dimensions…

  14. Power-Distance • How a culture handles notions of equality and power (US=40; Japan=54) HighLow Malaysia 104 Austria 11 Guatemala 95 Israel 13 Panama 95 Denmark 18 Philippines 94 New Zealand 22 Mexico 81 Ireland 28 Arab Countries 80 UK 35

  15. Uncertainty Avoidance • How a culture handles risk and uncertainty(US=46; Japan=92) • HighLow • Greece 112 Singapore 8 • Portugal 104 Jamaica 13 • Guatemala 101 Denmark 23 • Uruguay 100 Sweden 29 • Belgium 94 Hong Kong 29 • France 86 UK 35

  16. Masculinity How a culture handles assertiveness vs. modesty (US=62; Japan=95) HighLow Japan 95 Sweden 5 Austria 79 Norway 8 Venezuela 73 Netherlands 14 Italy 70 Denmark 16 Switzerland 70 Costa Rica 21 Mexico 69 Yugoslavia 21

  17. Individualism How a culture handles the individual vs. the group (US=91; Japan=46) HighLow USA 91 Guatemala 6 Australia 90 Equador 8 UK 89 Panama 11 Canada 80 Venezuela 12 Netherlands 80 Colombia 13 New Zealand 79 Indonesia 14

  18. Power-Distance Uncertainty Avoidance Masculinity Individualism Israel SE Asia, Latin America Singapore, Jamaica Latin Europe, Latin America Nordic Countries Japan Latin America, SE Asia UK, US High Low

  19. Implicit Organizational Model

  20. Position of 40 countries

  21. Extensions • Later Hofstede added long-term orientation basically, how a culture treats future (how long in the future). Currently Hofstede’s four (or five) dimensions are the basis for almost all organizational and national business cultural studies.

  22. Trompenaars (1996) • From a view-point of conflict and dilemmas in relationships with people, time, and natural environment.

  23. Seven dimensions • Universalism vs Particularism • Individualism vs Collectivism • Neutral vs Affective • Specific vs Diffuse • Achievement vs Ascription • Time-orientation (Future vs Past/Present) • Internal vs External Control

  24. Any Questions?

  25. Discussion Questions: • Do you see Hofstede’s argument in 4 (or 5) dimensions of culture logical? • How about 7 dimensions of Trompenaars? • What’s your experience with other cultures?

More Related