1 / 11

Administrative Record

Administrative Record. Administrative Record. Is the written record supporting the agency’s decisions. Must Show. Agency decisionmakers understood the legal standard applying to the decision.

Pat_Xavi
Télécharger la présentation

Administrative Record

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Administrative Record

  2. Administrative Record Is the written record supporting the agency’s decisions.

  3. Must Show • Agency decisionmakers understood the legal standard applying to the decision. • The standard was applied properly; that they considered the proper information, evaluated all of the factors requiring evaluation, and considered relevant factors in terms of the legal requirements governing the action. • The action taken is reasonable.

  4. Administrative Record • This entire file is submitted to the court, and the legal positions taken by the government are then based on this written record. • A good administrative record should reflect what the agency did and why it acted. • The record must reflect how the agency handled the information it received and developed. It must reflect the way the agency handled negative information.

  5. Documents Included • All documents and material directly or indirectly considered by the agency decision maker in making the challenged decision. • Include documents and materials whether they support or do not support the final agency decision. • Include documents and materials which were before or available to the decision-making office at the time the decision was made.

  6. Documents Included • Include documents and materials that were considered by or relied upon by the agency. • Include documents and materials that were before the agency at the time of the challenged decision, even if they were not specifically considered by the final agency decision-maker.

  7. Documents Included • Include privileged and non-privileged documents and materials. • (Once the record is complied privileged or protected documents and materials may be redacted or removed from the record.) • Remember to integrate State documents into the Administrative Record.

  8. How to organize the Administrative Record • Organize documents and materials from the beginning of the project. This way as the project is proceeding you are developing the administrative record. • Emails concerning the project – set up a cc box that all email communication concerning the project is automatically sent. • Organize the documents and materials in a logical and accessible way. • Put in chronological order and/or topic. • If do not fit in chronological order may be separated by category, e.g. internal policies, etc.

  9. How to organize the Administrative Record • Prepare an index. • After attorney review of record, Bate Stamp. • Agency (Division Office) must certify the administrative record.

  10. Consequences of Incomplete Administrative Records • Government may be allowed to complete but may raise questions about the completeness of the entire record. • Court may allow extra-record discovery, including depositions of agency personnel, and my allow court testimony of agency personnel. • Court may allow discovery if the court determines the incompleteness is based upon bad faith, or improprieties which may have influenced the decision-maker or the agency relied on substantial materials not included in the record.

  11. Example – Merritt Parkway Conservancy et. al. v. Mineta • The court found that the agency failed to adequately document in the administrative record and its 4(f) statement, efforts to comply with the guidelines and show minimization measures. • The court emphasized that it was not finding that the design as proposed failed to minimize harm but rather that the administrative record failed to document the minimization measures.

More Related