1 / 26

PHRAAC Presentation

PHRAAC Presentation. Bowhunting Opportunity. June 2, 2008. Why UBBC?. The United Bowhunters of BC came to be as a result of a joint bowhunter’s meeting with then Minister Barisoff in March 2004

Pat_Xavi
Télécharger la présentation

PHRAAC Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHRAAC Presentation Bowhunting Opportunity June 2, 2008

  2. Why UBBC? • The United Bowhunters of BC came to be as a result of a joint bowhunter’s meeting with then Minister Barisoff in March 2004 • Minister Barisoff indicated that if bowhunters would organize themselves into one voice, then united, that voice would be given opportunity to be heard.

  3. Status Quo • Many bowhunters in local (regional based) clubs and in the provincial UBBC, TBBC, and BCAA feel under represented • The concerns, interests, and input that the bowhunting fraternity want to have heard and considered has historically been disregarded. • Bowhunting needs consideration. • Provides another avenue to meet Provincial objectives • Many hunters enjoy the challenge of a bow and would prefer to hunt with a bow full time.

  4. Provincially - Bowhunters Lack a Voice

  5. Good Ideas? Perhaps. No Avenue for Discussion

  6. Knowledge Based Details

  7. Current Discussions • A number of BCWF member clubs representing a significant portion of the total BCWF membership are supportive of the UBBC, TBBC, and BCAA’s interests in having a voice either through a seat at the PHRAAC table or at least through formation of a sub-committee of the BCWF’s Wildlife Committee. • The BCWF President is consulting his executive this month and will decide on forming such a committee.

  8. Bowhunter Objectives • Support Government’s youth recruitment objectives • Support hunter recruitment • Continued wildlife conservation • Increase in “bow only” seasons as a legitimate alternative to current strategies that result in a loss of opportunity • Quality “bow only” seasons • Less ‘competitive’ approach than GOS (more relaxing) • Identify new opportunities for wildlife management • Recognize bowhunters are adaptable • Determine a non-confrontational approach to resolving issues important to hunting and bowhunting. • Bowhunting Education

  9. Bowhunter Objectives • Parity • If a Regional proposal for a new “Bow Only” Full Curl Ram opportunity is turned down because it “may” take away another’s opportunity (Current MOE Special Weapons Policy) then, • A GOS whitetail deer doe season would clearly compromise any late season bow only opportunity and should be considered on the same basis.

  10. Recruitment • Archery as an outdoor sport attracts non-hunters. • No firearms course or license exist as a barrier to entry. • Children enroll in 3-D Archery shoots each year which provides a breeding ground for new hunters • Encourage schools in BC to introduce archery as part of the physical education curriculum • Increased interest within the bowhunting community to have the IBEP course mandatory • BCAA/UBBC are committed to having a dozen new instructors trained this calendar year. • Creating quality bowhunting opportunity will encourage retention for cross-over hunters

  11. Archery/Bowhunting • Favourable entry point for youth • Safe • Less regulation (than Firearms) • Easier for a non hunting parent to support • Use of 3D • Youth become aware of the hunt • Non-hunters may accept • Learned skills and philosophy • Healthy lifestyle

  12. Youth Winners at the TBBC Championships May 2008

  13. Archery/Bowhunting • Close in activity (intense) • Great satisfaction • Places success in the experience not the kill • Learned skills and philosophy • Provides for ‘Micro-Management’ opportunities • Community / Rancher / Wildlife Conflicts (Zone ‘X’) • Interface areas • Cautious beginnings

  14. Retention • Bow only areas and seasons (in addition to the GOS) increase the odds of success. Wildlife is much more elusive once firearms are introduced. • More opportunity = better chance of success = satisfaction and nothing breeds commitment like success. Providing more bow only opportunity will encourage bowhunters to stay actively involved. • Bowhunting attracts rifle hunters that are looking for a greater challenge. Some of those hunters might drift away from hunting if a viable and realistic bowhunting season is not available.

  15. Conservation • Bowhunters are typically avid sportsmen and are committed to conservation values. The bowhunting community contribute volunteer hours per year on various habitat and wildlife projects • Bowhunters put in significant time in the field and have intimate knowledge of game populations that should be valuable to PHRAAC allocation committee. • Bowhunters do not harvest a significant amount of game as to effect populations dramatically therefore increased bow-only seasons pose little threat. Average success rate is one big game animal in 7 years

  16. Technological advancement - better rifles, more efficient muzzleloaders, faster bows, variable scopes, and four-wheel drive vehicles - ushered in regulations such as limited-entry hunting, road closures and restricted hunting seasons. Each time technology surges forward, killing wildlife becomes a little easier, more people join in, wildlife become more vulnerable, and more regulations are needed. -David Stalling, Space Age Technology, Stone Age Pursuit

  17. Finally • Additional seasons, keeps hunters in the field. • An increase in bowhunting opportunity will entice young people to participate and seasoned hunters to continue hunting. • Bowhunting is a healthy lifestyle alternative and archery in schools, and bowhunting opportunity for all has benefits that go beyond hunting.

  18. Some ideas • Hunter Questionnaire • No bowhunting data collected • (previously agreed to with Minister Barisoff (March 2004)) • Bowhunter Conservation License • (previously discussed with then Minister Barisoff (March 2004)) • Allows for immediate capture of data • Propose a “mandatory” check box on the hunting license Rifle/shotgun Bow Both

  19. Current Status • Regional Advisory groups have representation from the BCTA, BCWF, GOABC and UBBC. • PHRAAC does not • PHRAAC meet to assess GOS and LEH opportunity. • There is no regular/coordinated assessment of Bowhunting, the opportunities and the impacts. • Bring the bowhunting community on board, provide them the background to understand, support and participate.

  20. Solution • BCWF create an Archery sub-committee • The Chair of the archery sub-committee may be offered a seat at PHRAAC

  21. Moving Forward Special Weapons Hunting June 02, 2008

  22. We refer to it as a Special Weapons Policy & Procedure. • What is the issue we are attempting to resolve with this policy? (it must serve a purpose) • What is the objective of this Policy? (…to “support” new bowhunting opportunity?) • Do we need to define/clarify “opportunity”? • How do we measure ‘opportunity’ • Are we suggesting Policy • Is there an opportunity to amend point number 3 of the Policy to support the Procedure point 4 (a) “(3) support opportunities for archery hunting where socially acceptable and where there are restrictions on the discharge of firearms;” • (3) support opportunities for archery hunting where it will create more hunter opportunity in harvest sensitive situations and where there are restrictions on the discharge of firearms;

  23. Procedure • Clarity, Point 4. “….if regular general open seasons (GOS) and Limited Entry Hunting (LEH) have been considered first…” • What do we mean by “considered”? (LEH is a priority over archery?) • Does that mean that if it is not bioligically acceptable to have a GOS that we must go to LEH before a bow only opportunity can be sought?  • What conditions upon LEH must be met or not met that allow a bow only season to be considered? • What is meant by the phrase…. ...."and it is determined that an archery season will provide maximum overall hunting opportunity while meeting conservation needs" • With the above statement, our position – to which we must agree – there is not a lottery driven LEH season today that might provide more “overall hunting opportunity” relative to an open bowhunting opportunity.

  24. Opportunity Potential Loss of Opportunity • Does this policy suggest, that if a moose GOS can not be sustained, that an LEH season must be considered, prior to a bowhunting season?  Potential to Open a new opportunity • Does this policy suggest that if Gov is looking to open up a new season and there is a biological concern of over harvest that LEH will be considered, prior to bowhunting opportunity?

  25. Impact of Applying the P&P Bow proposal • 1) If, there is currently a GOS sheep hunt for full curl, is it possible to recommend a Full curl sheep hunt in the archery only season? GOS Proposal • 2) If a whitetail doe hunt is proposed, "if" it is deemed to have a biological impact on whitetail populations, will it be considered to have a negative impact on a late season bow only opportunity? And if this is the case, will it not be supported? 

More Related