1 / 19

Civil Service Modeling: Simplifying the Complexities of Civil Service Pay and Employment

Civil Service Modeling: Simplifying the Complexities of Civil Service Pay and Employment. Why Model?. Two Dominant Approaches to Civil Service Pay and Employment Reform. Macro-Analysis: The Meat-Axe Approach? 2. Micro-Review: The Bean-Counting Perspective .

Renfred
Télécharger la présentation

Civil Service Modeling: Simplifying the Complexities of Civil Service Pay and Employment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Civil Service Modeling: Simplifying the Complexities of Civil Service Pay and Employment

  2. Why Model?

  3. Two Dominant Approaches to Civil Service Pay and Employment Reform • Macro-Analysis: The Meat-Axe Approach? 2. Micro-Review: The Bean-Counting Perspective

  4. Macro-Analysis to determine appropriate size and cost of civil service • How it works: • Gross criteria to gauge nature and extent of reform needed • (Wage bill/GDP; government employment per capita; salary compression ratios, public-private wage relativities) • Pros and Cons: • Broad-brush reform guidance but over-simplified basis for government policy and lending terms and conditions

  5. Micro-Reviews (Functional Analysis) to determine staffing and incentive levels • How it works: • Bottom-up scrutiny of individual organizational units’ objectives, tasks, and resource requirements • Pros and Cons: • Accurate picture of on-the-ground reality • Inconsistent methodology – wide variability in quality • Hard to do – takes forever • Difficult to sum up parts: challenge to build coherent civil service strategy for whole based on micro- unit-based details

  6. Both approaches left big problems un-addressed • Low Government Policymaking Capacity for CSR • CSR-P&E Reality Hopelessly Complex • Competing Sectoral Considerations • New Wrinkles: Decentralization • Conflicting Government Objectives (Social Welfare vs. Fiscal Prudence) • Flimsy Empirical Basis to Donor-Country Dialogue (Discussion often on different pages)

  7. What is the CS-P&E Model? Civil service modeling as middle-range analytic tool to bridge gap in existing approaches • Uses country customized data to render the key attributes of current P&E situation • Pay and grading arrangements • CS employment numbers • Sectoral/ministerial geographical particulars • Establishes reform objectives and parameters–“Five-year CSR vision” • Wage bill envelope • Compression ratio and salary levels • Public-private relativities

  8. What is the CS-P&E Model? Civil service modeling as middle-range analytic tool to bridge gap in existing approaches • Simulates reform options – calculating and demonstrating costs of alternative policy measures • assumptions about timing and extent of retrenchment or retirements • implications of different levels of pay raises • altering sectoral employment levels (teachers, health workers)

  9. The Joys of the Model • Provides governments with hands-on tool for plotting realistic reform strategy with concrete targets • Sorts out wheat from chaff – focus on big picture • Raises level of dialogue with donors (and donor understanding of issues) • Helps policy makers combat special pleading of sectoral interests

  10. The Woes of the Model • Cannot (should not) render all detailed characteristics of individual country CS reality (Trade-off between simplicity/clarity and accuracy) • Garbage in-Garbage Out (Poor data mean targets may be off) • Cannot make hard decisions for policy makers • Haven’t dealt with some critical issues (pensions variables hard to incorporate) • Cannot replace good establishment management systems (HR database, tight payroll controls, etc.) • Cannot provide detailed information for reform implementation (for retrenchment; severance package design, etc. – consultancy needed)

  11. East Asia ExperiencePilots in 6 Countries: Capacity Building Grant from ASEM Cambodia Timor Leste Philippines Mongolia Indonesia Thailand

  12. Cambodia: The situation • Wage bill low by international comparators (US$ 52.4 million, 1.7% of GDP in 1999), but revenue projections missing targets set by Fund • Very low average wages (4 times less than national minimum wage) and very compressed from top to bottom, 2:1 • Census being carried out, but meanwhile no accurate information on numbers, placement, skills of employees • estimated 164,000 civil servants (14 civil servants per 1000 population)

  13. Cambodia: The problem • Pressure from Fund to maintain wage bill • Higher salaries necessary to attract more skilled civil servants • Fund’s solution: cut employment immediately (yesterday), but clueless about how much • arbitrary target of 15%, allowing across the board 10% wage increase • Our solution: provide targets for salary adjustment and decompression, wage bill envelope, and rightsizing options through modeling exercise over several months

  14. Cambodia: Reform options • Raise salaries, but keep wage bill constant, by retrenchment (see chart on costs of employment) • Different degrees of salary increases will mean different retrenchment imperatives

  15. East Timor: The Situation • New country with no parameters -- wage bill envelope, salary scale, numbers and types of civil servants (and functions and structures) all still to be determined • U.N. organization acting an interim government • setting wage precedents with its own staff • setting up structures, rules and budgets over next few fiscal years, with various binding consequences for East Timorese government when constituted 2002-3. • donor group meeting in Lisbon end-June to determine East Timor’s immediate future

  16. East Timor: The Problem • With little private sector activity, fluctuating prices and fluid labor market -- and invasion of expatriate assistance -- setting civil service pay and employment rules is an arbitrary exercise

  17. East Timor: Reform options • Budget planning assumptions • GDP conjectured at pre-ballot levels (US$ 300 million) • Revenues (donor-funded and later own-sourced) 15% of GDP • Expenditures set even with revenues (US$ 45 million) • Pay and employment assumptions • Employment 15,000 (about half of Indonesian civil service in East Timor province) • Wage bill 65% of total expenditure (high by international standards) • Salary scale -- only information on basic wage from cost of living study • Compression ratio of between 4:1 and 7:1

  18. East Timor: Short to middle-range approach • Determine salary scale • using Indonesian comparators • find reservation wage for benchmark jobs through quick and dirty comparator pay survey • cost of living study for living wage • Determine wage bill by affordability and international comparators • Try to match up rough functions and structures and staffing • Use above and international comparators to determine staffing numbers • Simulating future civil service pay and employment scenarios (Australian Dept of Finance providing assistance for modeling exercise)

  19. Results Cambodia • Govt. and donors on same page (single sheet) • Govt. proposed better – though not satisfactory – P&E strategy • Pinpointed analytic work agreed upon • Bank placing CSR at center of PRSC

More Related