1 / 6

Are Ghost Authors Affecting the Authenticity of Clinical Trials

Are Ghost Authors Affecting the Authenticity of Clinical Trials

RobertEN
Télécharger la présentation

Are Ghost Authors Affecting the Authenticity of Clinical Trials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Are GhostAuthorsAffectingtheAuthenticity of ClinicalTrials? Enago Academy is here to answer all your questions related to academic research and publishing.

  2. ENAGO ACADEMY Enago Academy offers comprehensive and up-to-date resources for researchers, publishers, editors, and students to learn and share their experience about research and publishing. Enago Academy also conducts workshops primarily for ESL authors, early-stage researchers, and graduate students. Our advanced workshop modules cater to the needs of researchers who want to know more about the issues pertinent to successful publication.

  3. ENAGO Enago is the trusted name in author services for the global research community. Since 2005, we have worked with researchers in more than 125 countries improving the communication of their research and helping them to achieve success in publication. We have offices in Tokyo, Seoul, Beijing, Shanghai, Istanbul, and New York. Enago operates globally with regional teams supporting researchers locally. Enago is the preferred partner for many leading universities and research organizations worldwide. In addition, we also collaborate with prominent publishers and societies to overcome regional challenges.

  4. 12/22/2018 Are Ghost Authors Affecting the Authenticity of Clinical Trials? - EnagoAcademy ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅Are GhostAuthorsAffecting❅theAuthenticity of ClinicalTrials? ❅ ❅ ❅ Last updated Dec 12,2018 Ghost authors — individuals that make a large contribution to a research article but are not listed as an author — appear to be common in large clinical trials. Theseclinical ❅ trials are instrumental in testing medical treatments before their approval by the regulating authority. Therefore, they need to be accurate, reproducible and aboveall transparent. Researchers publish their work as a team-effort. The first author does most of the research work, followed by colleagues who worked on the project in descending order of contribution. The last author is usually the supervisor of the research project. Journals have guidelines for authorship to ensure everyone listedas an author is due theircredit. On the other hand, authors of papers take responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the publisheddata. Clinical TrialValidity Having all the authors listed in an articleis important, especially amidst the current reproducibility crisis.Alarmingly, a study found that many cases of published clinical treatments wereeither: not as effective as claimed (56%) not reproducible (34%) harmful, in a minority ofcases.  Reproducibility of science and especially clinical trials is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatments. Medical personnel and authorities rely on thepublished data for publichealth. https://www.enago.com/academy/are-ghost-authors-affecting-the-authenticity-of-clinical-trials/

  5. 12/22/2018 Are Ghost Authors Affecting the Authenticity of Clinical Trials? - EnagoAcademy Another issue with clinical trial data is that many of these trials are not reporting their outcomes timeously, if at all. It seems companies that sponsor clinical trials are more likely to report their results within the time limit compared to academic institutions. The reason is mostly a matter of resources rather than ill-intent. For example, inacademic institutions, doctors working on a research project may start working elsewhere, leaving the data unpublished. However, in some odd occasions clinical trial results remain withheld due to malicious reasons. This is unethical and the scientific community should enforce transparency to overcome theseissues. Is Ghost AuthorshipProblematic? Ghost writers generally consist of statisticians, researchers, medical or technical writers and medical communicators. These individuals are employed bypharmaceutical companies to produce an article from raw data. Some researchers felt that ghost authors limit their academic freedom during the analysis of clinical trial data collectedby them. Academic authors have suggested that approximately 21 % of published medical papers contain ghost authors. If ghost writers are the main contributors to large clinicaltrials, then this research lacks the two key factors of authorshipnamely: transparency accountability Is this problematic? Sometimes a statistician will analyze trial data, but the researcher will interpret the analysis. Therefore, the statistician will not be an author becausetheir input did not meet the authorshiprequirements. However, research papers that lack transparency and accountability are inappropriate for published journal articles. It suggests that undeclared conflicts of interest. This threatens the authenticity of the clinical trials. If an individual contributes to a paper but does not meet the author requirements of the journal, they should beacknowledged. InSummary Overall, ghost authors do affect the authenticity of clinical trials. Even if the ghost writers are acting in good faith and reporting the data accurately, their absence in the list of authors seems inappropriate and makes it look as if conflicts of interest are being hidden. In the interest of clinical data authenticity, ghost writer’s names should appear onthe paper. Would you trust clinical trial data analyzed a ghost author? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.  Honorary and ghostauthorships REPORTINGRESEARCH PUBLISHINGRESEARCH IMPORTANTLINKS OURSERVICES ABOUTUS GLOBALENAGO Language &Grammar JournalGuidelines SelectingJournals SubmittingManuscripts PhDs &Postdocs Product & Service Reviews English EditingServices Copy EditingServices ContactUs Guest Contributor Manuscripts &Grants ReferenceManagement UnderstandingReviews UnderstandingEthics Ask aQuestion! Substantive EditingServices Publication SupportServices About EnagoAcademy Figures &Tables Proofreading Services Enago Academy offers comprehensive and up-to-date resources for researchers, publishers, editors, and students to learn and share their experience about research and publishing. Enago Academy also conducts workshops primarily for ESL authors,early-stage  researchers,andgraduatestudents.Ouradvancedworkshopmodulescatertotheneedsofresearcherswhowanttoknowmoreabouttheissuespertinenttosuccessfulpublication.ReadMore Copyright © 2018 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | PrivacyPolicy | Terms & Conditions| ContactUs https://www.enago.com/academy/are-ghost-authors-affecting-the-authenticity-of-clinical-trials/

  6. 12/22/2018 Are Ghost Authors Affecting the Authenticity of Clinical Trials? - EnagoAcademy Pleasetellusyourthoughtsinthecommentssection. If you have any questions related to Editing Services for Scientific manuscript editing by Enago English Editing, please contact - orders@enago.com. https://www.enago.com/academy/are-ghost-authors-affecting-the-authenticity-of-clinical-trials/

More Related