1 / 12

The 2008 Emergency Regulation of Short Selling

The 2008 Emergency Regulation of Short Selling. Kym Sheehan. Reading Questions. 1. According to IOSCO, what are the principles of securities regulation? What is the difference between a ‘principle’ of securities regulation and a ‘rule’ of securities regulation?

abbott
Télécharger la présentation

The 2008 Emergency Regulation of Short Selling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The 2008 Emergency Regulation of Short Selling Kym Sheehan

  2. Reading Questions 1. According to IOSCO, what are the principles of securities regulation? What is the difference between a ‘principle’ of securities regulation and a ‘rule’ of securities regulation? 2.What does the author mean by ‘regulatory objective’? Why is it important to have regulatory objectives in mind when devising a system of regulation for an activity such as short selling? 3.All three jurisdictions discussed in the chapter agreed that short selling was a legitimate practice. If short selling is a legitimate market practice, why should short-selling be regulated? Is there any justification for banning short-selling? 4. Prior to 2008, the UK did not regulate short-selling at all (cf Australia and the USA). Why do you think this situation existed? 5. The Australian approach is complicated by the fact that two different regulators were involved with overlapping jurisdiction. What are the benefits and weaknesses of a multi-regulator versus single regulator approach?

  3. Reading Questions 6. The SEC has very different rules on short-selling compared with the UK and Australia. Why do you think this is? 7. Disclosure of short sales was a common regulatory technique deployed in the pre-ban period in Australia and the USA. Why do you think that is? 8. What are the limits of disclosure as a regulatory technique? Identify two different types of disclosure rules mentioned in the chapter and state their regulatory purpose. 8. The FSA noted the optimal level of disclosure of net short positions may be less than full transparency (FSA 2009a, [2.6]). 9. Do you think the ‘circuit breaker’ mechanism (see Avgouleas 2010) might be a better option to an outright ban? 10. The author comments on transnational regulatory initiatives to regulate short-selling by IOSCO and the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR). Why are such transnational approaches to regulating short-selling desirable? Should the role extend beyond standard setting to some form of monitoring of nation states?

  4. Objectives of Securities Regulation • IOSCO Principles 2003 • Regulation should facilitate capital formation and economic growth • No unnecessary barriers to entry to/exit from markets • Markets open to widest range of participants ho meet specified entry criteria • Regulatory bodies consider the regulatory impact of any policy initiatives • All participants should face the same regulatory burden • Principles 6.1, 27, 28, 29 and 30.

  5. Objectives of securities regulators • Financial systems • The performance of the financial system (ASIC) • Maintain confidence in the financial system (FSA) • protect the national banking and Federal Reserve systems • Market integrity • Overall efficiency and development of the economy • Protecting the financial system can mean taking regulatory actions in the securities markets

  6. Approach: Australia

  7. Approach: FSA

  8. Approach: SEC

  9. Issues for move to common approach/1 • What is the required relationship between a person and a security that makes the person a short seller (that is, the definition issue)? • How certain does the seller need to be that he/she can deliver the securities at settlement (that is, the title issue)?

  10. Issues for move to common approach/2 • Short selling is a legitimate practice but ... • It creates settlement problems that need a regulatory solution • It can be a form of market abuse or market manipulation • It might create a systemic risk problem

  11. Issues for move to common approach/3 • The various regulatory techniques deployed • Disclosure-based initiatives • 4 dimensions to consider • A short position or a short sale • Net or gross positions • How timely must the disclosure be? • How public should the information be? • Prohibitions/ restrictions/ exceptions • Managing settlement risk

  12. Conclusion • Objectives of all three securities regulators refer to the financial system • Banned short sales in financial institutions to maintain confidence in banking system: see Exchange Act Release 58166 (15 July 2008) re Bear Stearns and rumours • Actual regulatory process during temporary ban differed from normal regulatory processes • Highly consultative processes shortened • Mixed purposes in rules introduced: disclosure to monitor and detect market abuse different from disclosure to inform market • Who‘s going to process all the information gained from different disclosures?

More Related