1 / 29

Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID

Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID. Michelle LeBrun-Griffin griffin@ctserc.org Kim Mearman mearman@ctserc.org. PJ Settlement Goals. Increase in the % of students with MR (ID) who are placed in regular classes (80% or more of day with nondisabled peers)

abram
Télécharger la présentation

Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID Michelle LeBrun-Griffin griffin@ctserc.org Kim Mearman mearman@ctserc.org

  2. PJ Settlement Goals • Increase in the % of students with MR (ID) who are placed in regular classes (80% or more of day with nondisabled peers) • Reduction in the disparate identification of students by LEA, race, ethnicity, gender • Increase in the mean and median % of the school day spent with nondisabled peers

  3. PJ Settlement Goals • Increase in the % of students who attend their “home school” (school they would otherwise attend if not disabled) • Increase in the % of students who participate in school-sponsored extracurricular activities with nondisabled students

  4. Goal #1 An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disabilitywho are placed in regular classes, as measured by the federal definition (i.e. 80% or more of the school day with non-disabled students).

  5. Goal #3 An increase in the mean and median percent of the school day that students with mental retardation or intellectual disability spend with non-disabled students.    (TWNDP)  

  6. Education Location of Students With ID 2001-2002 School Year Data

  7. Education Location of Students With ID 2001-2002 School Year Data

  8. Average Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data

  9. Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data

  10. Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data

  11. Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data

  12. Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data

  13. Goal #2 A reduction in the disparate identification of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability by LEA, by racial group, by ethnic group or by gender group.

  14. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Gender 2001-2002 School Year Data

  15. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group 2001-2002 School Year Data

  16. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group 2001-2002 School Year Data

  17. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group 2001-2002 School Year Data

  18. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency 2001-2002 School Year Data

  19. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency 2001-2002 School Year Data

  20. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency 2001-2002 School Year Data

  21. Goal #4 An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who attend the school they would attend if not disabled (“home school”).

  22. Goal #5 An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who participate in school-sponsoredextracurricular activities with non-disabled students.

  23. Other Data

  24. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Total Enrollment 2001-2002 School Year Data

  25. Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data

  26. Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data

  27. Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data

  28. Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data

  29. Staffing Ratios Per 1,000 School District Students 2001-2002 School Year Data

More Related