1 / 54

Data Analysis Team

Data Analysis Team. Team MembersSaphira Baker, Chair; CCFGlenn Branham AssessorKaty Clossin Economic DevelopmentMissy Creasy Neighborhood DevelopmentTony Edwards Neighborhood DevelopmentJohnny Ellen Recreation and Leisure Gretchen Ellis CCFMatt Hartung Public WorksJim Herndon Neighborhood DevelopmentRon Higgins Neighborhood DevelopmentGwen Jackson Recreation and LeisureTom McKean Police DepartmentMike Murphy Social servicesUrsula Palmer Social Services.

adamdaniel
Télécharger la présentation

Data Analysis Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    2. Data Analysis Team Team Members Saphira Baker, Chair; CCF Glenn Branham Assessor Katy Clossin Economic Development Missy Creasy Neighborhood Development Tony Edwards Neighborhood Development Johnny Ellen Recreation and Leisure Gretchen Ellis CCF Matt Hartung Public Works Jim Herndon Neighborhood Development Ron Higgins Neighborhood Development Gwen Jackson Recreation and Leisure Tom McKean Police Department Mike Murphy Social services Ursula Palmer Social Services Team Members Dave Uhlig City Schools Karen Waters QCC Barbara Venerus Neighborhood Development Charles Werner Fire Department Data Mapped by Jim Herndon, Tom McKean, Katy Clossin, and Brady Bowling. Collected by interagency team. Shown visually and, as a percentage of the population. Represents a point in time or cumulative 2001 information. Includes some 2002 data.

    3. City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Strategy Team appoints Data Team to compile comprehensive map of available citywide data assessing neighborhood conditions; Data Team members choose indicators, based on national models and recommendations of Transition and Intervention Teams; Police Chief Longo identifies Intervention Area as target neighborhood to reduce open air drug markets; Data team collects citywide data to understand neighborhood conditions, to compare with Intervention Area, and help to predict Transition areas. NST recommends that Data Team conduct analysis and make recommendations to Intervention Team. Background

    10. Demographics data was collected from both the 2000 census and the Charlottesville Public Schools for 2001 and 2002. Results: 40,049 residents from 2000 census. 4,256 public school students enrolled in K-12 in 2001 4,267 public school students enrolled in K-12 in 2002

    12. Students categorize themselves as one of six different races or ethnicities: White (Caucasian), Black (African-American), Hispanic, American Indian, Asian/ Pacific Islander, and Other. Results: In 2001, 57% of students were non-White. In 2002, 56% of students were non-White. Analysis: In 2001 there were five city neighborhoods that are 85% or more of a single ethnicity: Greenbrier, Fifeville, 10th & Page, Starr Hill, and Ridge St. In 2002 there were 7 neighborhoods that are 85% or more of a single ethnicity: Fifeville (Black), Greenbrier (White), Jackson Via (Black), Lewis Mtn (White), Rose Hill (Black), 10th & Page (Black), and Starr Hill (Black).

    15. Parents self-report by selecting one of six categories: students living with both parents, with their mother only, with their father only, with a guardian, living alone, or other. These data do not indicate if blended families, composed of a biological parent and a step parent, count as a two parent family or a single parent family. Children with single parents are more likely to suffer economic hardship (Americas Children, 2000). Results: 2001: 41% of students live with both parents 2002: 42% of students live with both parents Analysis: In 2001 there were five City neighborhoods where less than 30% of students lived with both parents: Fifeville, Ridge St, Rose Hill, The Meadows, and 10th & Page. In 2002 less than 30% of students in these same five neighborhoods lived with both parents.

    19. Students are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch based on family income, as determined by the Richard B. Russell School Lunch Act and the Child Nutrition Act. Results: Both 2001 and 2002: 46% of all public school students citywide are eligible Analysis: In 2001 there were five City neighborhoods where more than 60% of public school students were eligible: Fifeville, Jackson Via, Ridge St, The Meadows, and 10th & Page. In 2002 these same five neighborhoods had more than 60% of their students eligible for free or reduced lunch. Eligible Free and Reduced Lunch Program

    22. Social Services Public Assistance Cases

    25. Academics

    26. Public School Students Enrolled in Academic QUEST

    29. Standards of Learning Math Test

    35. Housing

    36. Housing Assessment Trends

    41. Crime

    42. The maps show incident reports of arrests for domestic assault. They do not necessarily represent the residences of the people involved. Domestic violence was mapped because research shows that it is linked to later negative outcomes for adolescents, such as delinquency, substance abuse, teen pregnancy, and foster care. Results: In 2001 there were 279 arrests citywide In 2002 there were 208, a 25% decrease. Analysis: In 2001, more than 25% of Domestic Assault Arrests occurred in Belmont. More than 15% occurred in Fifeville. In 2002, more than 25% of these arrests again occurred in Belmont. More than 15% of the arrests were in the Ridge Street neighborhood, which is not part of the Intervention Area. Domestic Assault Arrests

    45. Community Resources

    46. CLASS, City Recreation Centers, Weed & Seed and QCC, Childcare In 2001, 25% of students took advantage of the CLASS after school program. City recreation centers are clustered near public school student populations. Weed & Seed targets the Intervention area. QCC targets both the Intervention area and portions of other City neighborhoods mentioned in the presentation. Licensed and Unlicensed Childcare providers in 2001 clustered in the Intervention area. Selected City Resources

    47. Charlottesville City School after-school program for all six elementary schools. Data does not include programs at Walker Upper Elementary School. Results: In 2001, of the 1677 students citywide that could be enrolled in CLASS only 413 (25%) participate. In 2001, of the 324 students in the Intervention Area that could be enrolled in CLASS only 49 (15%) participate Creative Learning After School and in Summer (CLASS)

    50. Licensed -- Child care centers or family day care providers that meet regulations established by the State Department of Social Services. Unregistered -- Child care providers who are not licensed or registered by any state or local governmental body. 2001 Results: 32 (29%) registered citywide of total 111 providers. 10 (25%) registered in Intervention Area of 40 total providers. 30 (34%) of the Citys 89 unregistered providers are within the Intervention Area Child Care Providers - Licensed and Unlicensed

    52. Quality Community Council A community and neighborhood-based initiative to improve the quality of life in challenged City neighborhoods. Weed and Seed A federal grant strategy sponsored by the U.S.Department of Justice serving targeted City neighborhoods and all public housing communities. QCC and Weed and Seed

    54. Successes and Challenges Whats worked? Team work and Interdepartmental approach Confirmation of Intervention Area as needing attention Establishment of a baseline for future improvements Data to generate grant funds Better understanding of neighborhood conditions Information for targeted human service strategies Part of national trend toward using visual data for responsive and accountable service delivery. What hasnt worked? Limited staff and infrastructure Slow pace of data collection Dependence on annual data collection rather than ongoing assessment Uneven quality of data between departments Lack of integrated data system causes duplication and piecemeal collection of data Limited data analysis to date

More Related