1 / 17

District of Columbia Citywide Enterprise Architecture

District of Columbia Citywide Enterprise Architecture . Tom Mowbray, Keane Federal Systems DC OCTO Enterprise Architect April 13, 2005 Tom.Mowbray@DC.Gov Mowbray@Keane.com (202)727-9580. The EA Challenge Key EA Principles EA Framework To-Be EA Process As-Is EA Process EA Notation

adamdaniel
Télécharger la présentation

District of Columbia Citywide Enterprise Architecture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. District of ColumbiaCitywide Enterprise Architecture Tom Mowbray, Keane Federal Systems DC OCTO Enterprise Architect April 13, 2005 Tom.Mowbray@DC.Gov Mowbray@Keane.com (202)727-9580

  2. The EA Challenge Key EA Principles EA Framework To-Be EA Process As-Is EA Process EA Notation EA Views EA Governance Lessons Learned Outline ACRONYMS ARB ::= Architecture Review Board BPR ::= Business Process Engineering CONOPS ::= Concept of Operations EA ::= Enterprise Architecture OCTO ::= Office of the CTO SMP ::= Services Modernization Program • SERVICES MODERNIZATION PROGRAMS • Administrative (ASMP) • Customer (CSMP) • Education (EdSMP) • Enforcement (ESMP) • Financial (FSMP) • Human (HSMP) • Motorist (MSMP) • Property (PSMP) • Transportation (TSMP)

  3. Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems Agency Systems The District’s EA Challenge 9 Multi-Agency Services Modernization Programs (SMP) ASMP CSMP ESMP EdSMP FSMP HSMP MSMP PSMP TSMP Undocumented, Isolated Proejects 68 Agencies, Need Transparency 380+ Legacy Systems Strong Disincentives to Share, Need for Data Integrity

  4. RESULTS DRIVEN – Tactically Implementation Oriented Architecture results should be simple, practical, feasible, and useful VISUAL Priority for visual architecture models SELF-CONTAINED Docs must be self-explanatory and standalone BEST PRACTICES Use best practices of BPR and EA FACT-BASED and ACTIONABLE Generate rigorously engineered information that is actionable LONG TERM VIEW WITH SHORT TERM BENEFITS Define target architecture and cost benefits Show long term architectural fit; Conduct Benefits Realization Key EA PrinciplesOCTO’s Architecture Philosophy is Focused on Results Overall: Information Transparency Breeds Behavioral Correction

  5. DC Enterprise Architecture Framework (DC-EAF) SMP Concepts of Operations To-Be

  6. To-Be EA Process Understand the Problem, Define Business Solution Devise Target Architectures, Craft Transformation Plans, Initiate Cost-Benefits Realization

  7. Process for “To Be” Concept of Operations Process Improvement Planning Strategic Implementation Planning Project: Root Causes & Best Practices (i.e. Business Conops) Approx 2 MBA X 4-6 weeks Natural Role for Team of MBA/Business Analysts Identifies Scope of Project: Business Operating Model (i.e. Program Planning) Approx 2 MBA/Agency X 12-14 Weeks Business Solution Drives Business Priorities Determine Solution Direction Natural Role for BPR Group Technical Solution Enables SubProject: IT Architecture Envisioning Approx 1 Arch X 8-12 Weeks Natural Role for Enterprise Architecture Team • District Experiences with “To Be” Process: ASMP, CSMP, ESMP, HSMP • Cost of Concept of Operations is approx ½ Percent of Development Cost • Resulting Business Case: Cost-Benefits of Exceed Development Cost with Strong Stakeholder Buy-In/Ownership Best Practices Combination of BPR and EA

  8. “To Be” CONOPS 3X5 Matrix EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE BUSINESS/PROGRAM PERSPECTIVE GENERAL PERSPECTIVE

  9. ARB Milestone 1: CONOPS Checklist CV-1 CV-2 CV-3 CV-4 CV-5 CV-6 CV-7 CV-8 CV-9 CV-10 CV-11 We have many real examples of these deliverables

  10. “As Is” Enterprise Architecture Process 6/4/04 6/18/04 • Information • Architecture • Day • X-Brief • X-Linkage • Business • Architecture • Day • X-Brief • X-Linkage One-on-One Information Modeling Sessions One-on-One Business Arch Modeling Sessions EA FY05 Kickoff Meeting 7/2/04 7/16/04 • Application • Architecture • Day • X-Brief • X-Linkage One-on-One Application Arch Modeling Sessions • Infrastructure • Architecture • Day • X-Brief • X-Linkage One-on-One Infrastructure Modeling Sessions 8/6/04 • Next Year… • EA FY06 Kickoff (October 2005) • X-Brief FY05 “As Built” Models • FY05 Lessons Learned Review, Publicize, Finalize

  11. MODELING PRINCIPLES Simple Pragmatic Useful Self Explanatory In Laymans’ Terms Priority Driven Shows Relationships Readable Constraints Visio 2000 (5 Facet UML) Holistic View of SMP’s and Common Services EA Notation Conventions Example Information Object General Incident Information Bold Object Name (Abbreviation) General incident information is common header data on many MPDC forms, including: system generated case numbers, party identification, and incident locations. Current View Object Definition (free text) BV-ESMP MPDC Event Business Processes AV-ESMP Records Management System Application Modules NV-ESMP RMS Production DB Server NV-ESMP RMS Backup DB Server Infrastructure Components Always show UML facets in same order Current View then Business (BV), Information (IV), Appliacation (AV), Infrastructure (NV)

  12. Sample Enterprise Information Architecture Model STRICTLY PRELIMINARY DRAFT 6/1/2004

  13. Summary Business Enterprise Architecture Business Processes and Relationships Summary Information Enterprise Architecture Information Categories and Relationships Summary Application Enterprise Architecture Application components/modules and relationships Summary Infrastructure Enterprise Architecture Server and network components Installed software packages Enterprise Architecture Posters Focus is on SMPs and components they depend upon

  14. Architecture Trace-ability to Business Goals Mayors Citywide Strategic Goals Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal MPDC Scorecard Goals OCTO Scorecard Goals CFSA Scorecard Goals Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal ASMP HSMP ESMP

  15. MODEL ELEMENTS Server Systems LAN/WAN Network Components Storage Servers Network Connections LEVEL OF DETAIL (for Citywide EA) All Production SMP-related Server Boxes All Production SMP-related Network Boxes Major Production LAN/WAN components used by (or interfaced to) SMP’s Installed Software Packages and Versions Sample Infrastructure Architecture View SAMPLE MODEL SAMPLE MODEL The actual EA models are PROTECTED CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION (PCII)

  16. CONOPS Study Go / No-Go Selection Phase Development Phase Deploy Operations Phase Architecture Review Board ProcessAssuring IT Quality Through Milestone Peer Reviews Milestone 1 System Concept Readiness Validate Architecture RFP Milestone 2 Construction Readiness RFP RFP Milestone 3 Operational Readiness RFP Verify Design with Architecture Design Reviews Tactical Arch. Changes Verify Implementation with Architecture RFP Critical Architecture Decisions Tactical Arch. Changes Tactical Arch. Changes Important Architecture Decisions IT Systems Planning and Development Phase Advisory Services

  17. Key purpose of EA: Launch Migration to SOA Common Services Successful in Documenting and Prioritizing the Services through the EA Sparked Creation of New IT Business Unit for Common Services & Oversight Information Transparency Breeds Corrective Behavior Architecture requirements are becoming self-reinforcing through EA experience – Infrastructure Resilience, Use of Common Services Licenses,… Governance is Communications ARB Reviews Promote Many to Many Communications/Sharing of Expertise Discover new enterprise licenses / common service opportunities most every time ARB meets Plan for the consequences of architecture success New investment for platforms, operations, training, support for new enterprise license “Common Service” technologies Excellent development and operations phase management is required to realize architecture plans There are 25 concurrent EA-related initiatives in progress Conclusions: Lessons Learned

More Related