1 / 18

Environment, Safety and Health

Environment, Safety and Health. Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting February 8-9 2011. Outline. Baseline Scope, Staffing Progress since December 2009 Design/Radiation safety, Operations, Authorization Basis, Construction Risks Project Safety Record

adamsa
Télécharger la présentation

Environment, Safety and Health

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting February 8-9 2011

  2. Outline • Baseline • Scope, Staffing • Progress since December 2009 • Design/Radiation safety, Operations, Authorization Basis, Construction • Risks • Project Safety Record • Recommendation Status • Look Ahead • FY11 Goals • Issues • Conclusions

  3. ESH Scope • ESH Support for: • Design • Conventional Facilities • Accelerator Systems • Experimental Systems • Operations • Experimental Facilities • Experimental Reviews • Construction • Ring Building • LOB’s • Authorization Basis • Safety Assessment Documents • Accelerator Safety Envelopes • BORE, Equipment Readiness Reviews, ARR’s

  4. ESH Program Responsibilities • Safety system configuration control • Self-assessment • Risk assessment • Interlock testing • (radiation and laser) • Tier I inspections • Compliance audits • Training development • Document control • Readiness Reviews • Construction Safety • Experiment safety review • Work planning support • Emergency planning • Environmental management • Hazardous waste management • Industrial hygiene • Industrial safety • Radiation safety • ESH Facility & Equipment Design

  5. Environment, Safety and Health Organization Environment, Safety and Health Manager – S. Hoey Deputy – A. Ackerman Construction Safety Lead K. Krasner ESH Design & Commissioning Lead S. Hoey ESH Operations Manager A. Ackerman Laboratory Support Radiation Control F. Zafonte F. Flannigan Industrial Hygiene C. Weilandics Environmental Compliance D. Bauer Construction T. Conrad Readiness Review R. Travis ESH Coordinator L. Stiegler G. Wilson EWH T. Anschutz Radiation Physics P. K. Job Torcon K. Krasner ESH Engineer K. Klaus Health Physics W. R. Casey Readiness Evaluation B. Heneveld Safety Officer B. Chmiel Authorization Basis N. Gmur Safety Engineer T. McDonald COMMITTEES ALARA Committee Beam line Review Committee EMS/OHSAS Committee ES&H Committee ES&H Improvement Committee Interlock Working Group Review Committee PS Directorate Safety Committee ESH Assurance M. Buckley C. Nielson

  6. Institutional ESH Related Support • Resources from the Lab ESH and Support Organizations are needed to support the following phases; • Ongoing “design review” activities • Ongoing operations & construction support (NSLS and NSLS-II) • BORE’s • Equipment/instrument readiness reviews • Authorization Basis documentation development & review • ARR’s • Commissioning • Beam line development & commissioning • NSLS-II operations • Decommissioning - 725 Transition to Ops

  7. Progress - Radiation Safety Workshop • June 22-23, 2010 (third workshop) • Participants – ALS, APS, SSRL, ESRF Chaired by Paul Berkvens • Outcome: • Followed up on recommendations made at previous workshops (3/07 & 4/08) all prior recommendations closed, (15 from this workshop) • Provided feedback and lessons learned on workshop topical areas, beam line installation and accelerator commissioning • Received Committee’s concurrence that strategies for radiation safety for NSLS-II are sound and moving in the right direction “The committee is highly impressed with the progress that has been made to-date in working and resolving radiation safety issues for design and commissioning of NSLS-II since the last workshop”

  8. Progress - Area Monitors • Locations for area monitors have been planned for Linac, Booster, Storage Ring and beam enclosures (~60 units) • Area monitors will provide warnings locally and in control room and be interlocked to injection through PPS for high alarms • Monitors from 3 prospective vendors have been purchased, installed and tested at NSLS for. Testing included: • Comparison between units • Determine response to short pulse length radiation during injection • Evaluate long term stability of detector and reliability of unit • Permit better specification of units for final procurement • Two phase procurement: • 3 units procured Fall 2010 for Linac commissioning • Additional 52 units procured Spring 2011 for Booster and Storage Ring commissioning (award April 2011) Mirion, Apantec, HPI

  9. Progress - ESH Operations • NSLS ESH Operations and NSLS-II Operations are now combined • Includes significant footprint increase (research and development, assembly areas) • 725 – NSLS – 162,156 ft2 (Exp floor = 123,644 ft2) • 726 – NSLS - Mechanical Tech Support 3519 ft2 • 727 – NSLS – Mech/Magnet Measurement 3519 ft2 • 729 - NSLS Source Development Lab – 8018 ft2 • 902/905 – Magnet test and assembly, vacuum – 22,690 ft2 • 703 – Experimental Facilities Division, 9 new labs – 7,360 ft2 • 945 – Vacuum lab – 4,068 ft2 • 832 – RF development, magnetic measurement – 7,895 ft2 • 820 – Front Ends Diagnostics – 5,700 ft2 • Risk well understood & Controlled – lab work, mechanical • Assembly, chemicals, haz waste etc. • Work processes covered by 24 Project Safety Review Forms (PSRF’s) fully implemented

  10. Progress - Construction Safety • Contractor performing better than industry average • Many programmatic enhancements & best practices; • Increased use and detail of PHA’s • Increased communications – daily ESH planning mtgs; weekly ESH Mgmt mtgs; monthly ESH group mtgs, schedule and coordination mtgs with ESH. • Modified Safety Incentive – workers receive 90% • On site medical provider – NYS trained EMT’s • Drug screening, pre-employment and post-incident/cause • Construction safety assessment – contractor and NSLS-II

  11. Progress-Transition from Construction • Laboratory Beneficial Occupancy Readiness Review process will be used • Officially turns over sections of facility to allow machine installation • Specific NSLS-II BORE Plan in place that; • Defines scope • Establishes schedule • Identifies resources • Baseline BORE’s start Feb 2011 and go through June 2012 total of 10 BORES to match construction phases • Pre-BORE’s started Nov 1, 2010 (phase walk downs)

  12. Risk Analysis & Management

  13. Injury Summary • Operations: • 3/10/09 Recordable – Technician infection from splinter • Construction: • 7/16/09 Recordable – sub-contractor moving conduit chipped tooth • 9/30/09 DART – sub-contractor broken leg from rebar impact • 2/22/10 Recordable – sub-contractor fractured finger tip • 4/22/10 Recordable – sub-contractor cut leg with hammer claw • 7/26/10 DART – sub-contractor cut palms moving decking • 10/21/10 DART – sub-contactor pulled back muscle

  14. Project Safety Record (through December 2010) DART’s also count as TRC’s for rate calculations

  15. Recommendation Status • Continue to evaluate and improve oversight of contractors and subcontractors and their contractor and subcontractor ES&H programs. Closed • The project should begin planning now for the required safety readiness reviews (internal) for beam line commissioning. Closed (will cover in later presentation) • The renegotiation of the safety incentive on the ring building should be completed. Closed • New safety incentive should be included in the LOB procurement. Closed

  16. FY11 Goals • Development of the Linac and Booster Commissioning SAD’s, ASE’s and supporting documentation • Coordinate the BORE’s for transition to construction and manage findings • Develop acceptance and readiness processes for equipment installation • Provide ESH support for the radiological safety design of beam lines; design of the supplementary shielding; Personal Protection and Equipment Protection systems • Finalize area monitor testing/selection and initiate procurement • Maintain improving trend in construction contractor(s) performance and quickly bring the new prime up to a best in class level

  17. Issues • Coordination of prime construction contractors (Torcon & EWH) will need consistency of ESH implementation • Laboratory resources to support Transition to Operations will need to be managed • Increase in number of beam lines (and BL reviews)

  18. Summary • ESH Program is well defined and documented • ESH Staff is well qualified and in place • Performance metrics are trending positively • Early deficiencies in construction safety program implementation have been addressed and processes are in place to move forward safely with minimum risk • On track with authorization basis process including BORE, SAD’s and ASE’s • Program is continually improving & incorporating Lessons Learned

More Related