1 / 42

Nuclear Physics and the New Standard Model

Nuclear Physics and the New Standard Model. M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Wisconsin-Madison. NPAC. Theoretical Nuclear, Particle, Astrophysics & Cosmology. http://www.physics.wisc.edu/groups/particle-theory/. Taiwan , June 2008.

adie
Télécharger la présentation

Nuclear Physics and the New Standard Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nuclear Physics and the New Standard Model M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Wisconsin-Madison NPAC Theoretical Nuclear, Particle, Astrophysics & Cosmology http://www.physics.wisc.edu/groups/particle-theory/ Taiwan , June 2008

  2. The next decade presents NP with a historic opportunity to build on this legacy in developing the “new Standard Model” The value of our contribution will be broadly recognized outside the field Nuclear physics studies of ns & fundamental symmetries played an essential role in developing & confirming the Standard Model Our role has been broadly recognized within and beyond NP The Big Picture Solar ns & the neutrino revolution Fifty years of PV in nuclear physics

  3. Goals • Show how studies of fundamental symmetries & neutrinos in nuclear physics can complement high energy searches for the “new Standard Model” • Introduce some of the basic ideas & theoretical machinery, but leave details to your future reading • Describe recent progress & open problems • Encourage you to learn more and get involved in research !

  4. Outline Overview & Motivation Illustrative Scenario: Supersymmetry Neutrinos: Lepton Number &  EDMs & the Origin of Matter Electroweak Precision Observables Weak Decays Neutral Current Processes

  5. References • “Low Energy Precision Test of Supersymmetry”, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf & S. Su, Phys.Rept.456:188, 2008, e-Print: hep-ph/0612057Model” • “Low energy tests of the weak interaction”, J. Erler & M. J. Ramsey-Musolf , Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.54:351 442, 2005, e-Print: hep-ph/0404291 Plus many references therein…

  6. Motivation • Why New Symmetries ? • Why Low Energy Probes ?

  7. Electroweak symmetry breaking: Higgs ? Beyond the SM SM symmetry (broken) Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History

  8. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) & light element abundances • Weak interactions in stars & solar burning • Supernovae & neutron stars It utilizes a simple and elegant symmetry principle SU(3)c x SU(2)L x U(1)Y to explain the microphysics of the present universe Standard Model puzzles Standard Model successes Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History

  9. Non-zero vacuum expectation value of neutral Higgs breaks electroweak sym and gives mass: Electroweak symmetry breaking: Higgs ? • Where is the Higgs particle? • Is there more than one? Puzzles the St’d Model may or may not solve: U(1)EM SU(3)c x SU(2)L x U(1)Y How is electroweak symmetry broken? How do elementary particles get mass ? Standard Model puzzles Standard Model successes Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History

  10. Electroweak symmetry breaking: Higgs ? Beyond the SM SM symmetry (broken) Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History Puzzles the Standard Model can’t solve Origin of matter Unification & gravity Weak scale stability Neutrinos What are the symmetries (forces) of the early universe beyond those of the SM?

  11. C:Charge Conjugation Cosmic Energy Budget Electroweak symmetry breaking: Higgs ? • P: Parity Beyond the SM SM symmetry (broken) Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History Baryogenesis: When? CPV? SUSY? Neutrinos? WIMPy D.M.: Related to baryogenesis? “New gravity”? Lorentz violation? Grav baryogen ? ?

  12. Unification? Use gauge coupling energy-dependence look back in time Present universe Early universe Standard Model High energy desert Energy Scale ~ T Weak scale Planck scale Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History

  13. Present universe Early universe Standard Model Gravity A “near miss” for grand unification Is there unification? What new forces are responsible ? High energy desert Weak scale Planck scale Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History

  14. Present universe Early universe Unification Neutrino mass Origin of matter Standard Model Weak Int Rates: Solar burning Element abundances Weak scale unstable: Why is GF so large? High energy desert Weak scale Planck scale Fundamental Symmetries & Cosmic History

  15. Supersymmetry, GUT’s, extra dimensions… There must have been additional symmetries in the earlier Universe to • Unify all matter, space, & time • Stabilize the weak scale • Produce all the matter that exists • Account for neutrino properties • Give self-consistent quantum gravity

  16. Large Hadron Collider Ultra cold neutrons LANSCE, NIST, SNS, ILL CERN What are the new fundamental symmetries? Two frontiers in the search Collider experiments (pp, e+e-, etc) at higher energies (E >> MZ) Indirect searches at lower energies (E < MZ) but high precision Particle, nuclear & atomic physics High energy physics

  17. Electroweak symmetry breaking: Higgs ? ? Low-energy: precision frontier LHC: energy frontier Beyond the SM SM symmetry (broken) Precision Probes of New Symmetries New Symmetries Origin of Matter Unification & gravity Weak scale stability Neutrinos

  18. Probing Fundamental Symmetries beyond the SM: Use precision low-energy measurements to probe virtual effects of new symmetries & compare with collider results • Precision measurements predicted a range for mt before top quark discovery • mt >> mb ! • mt is consistent with that range • It didn’t have to be that way • Precision Frontier: • Precision ~ Mass scale • Look for pattern from a variety of measurements • Identify complementarity with collider searches • Special role: SM suppressed processes Radiative corrections Direct Measurements Stunning SM Success Precision & Energy Frontiers J. Ellison, UCI

  19. Precision ~ Mass Scale M=m~ 2 x 10-9 exp ~ 1 x 10-9 M=MW ~ 10-3 Interpretability • Precise, reliable SM predictions • Comparison of a variety of observables • Special cases: SM-forbidden or suppressed processes Precision, low energy measurements can probe for new symmetries in the desert

  20. II. Illustrative Case: SUSY • Why Supersymmetry ? • Key Features of SUSY

  21. Present universe Early universe Standard Model High energy desert Weak scale Planck scale Couplings unify with SUSY Supersymmetry

  22. GF ~ 10-5/MP2 mWEAK ~ 250 GeV l GF is Too Large

  23. =0 if SUSY is exact SUSY protects GF

  24. GF & the “hierarchy problem” SUSY Relation: Quadratic divergence ~ UV2 cancels After EWSB:

  25. c0 Lightest SUSY particle CP Violation Unbroken phase Broken phase SUSY may help explain observed abundance of matter Cold Dark Matter Candidate Baryonic matter: electroweak phase transition

  26. SUSY: a candidate symmetry of the early Universe • Unify all forces • Protect GF from shrinking • Produce all the matter that exists 3 of 4 Yes Maybe so Maybe Probably necessary • Account for neutrino properties • Give self-consistent quantum gravity

  27. Supersymmetry Fermions Bosons sfermions gauginos No new coupling constants Two Higgs vevs Higgsinos Supersymmetric Higgs mass,  Charginos, neutralinos Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM)

  28. If nature conserves vertices have even number of superpartners • Lightest SUSY particle is stable viable dark matter candidate • Proton is stable • Superpartners appear only in loops SUSY and R Parity Consequences

  29. “Superpotential” : a convenient way to derive supersymmetric interactions by taking derivatives w.r.t. scalar fields Li, Qi SU(2)L doublets Ei, Ui, Di SU(2)L singlets R-Parity Violation (RPV) L=1 WRPV = ijk LiLjEk + ijk LiQjDk +/i LiHu + ijkUiDjDk B=1 proton decay: Set ijk =0

  30. 12k 1j1 12k 1j1 L=1 L=1 Four-fermion Operators

  31. SUSY Breaking Superpartners have not been seen Theoretical models of SUSY breaking Visible World Hidden World Flavor-blind mediation How is SUSY broken? SUSY must be a broken symmetry

  32. Superpartners have not been seen Theoretical models of SUSY breaking Gaugino mass ~ 100 new parameters 40 new CPV phases Flavor mixing parameters Triscalar interactions One solution: af ~ Yf Sfermion mass O(1) CPV phases & flavor mixing ruled out by expt: “SUSY CP” & “SUSY flavor” problems How is SUSY broken? MSSM SUSY Breaking

  33. Visible Sector: Hidden Sector: SUSY-breaking MSSM Flavor-blind mediation MSSM: SUSY Breaking Models I Gravity-Mediated (mSUGRA)

  34. Visible Sector: Hidden Sector: SUSY-breaking MSSM Flavor-blind mediation messengers MSSM: SUSY Breaking Models II Gauge-Mediated (GMSB)

  35. Visible Sector: Hidden Sector: SUSY-breaking MSSM Flavor-blind mediation at the weak scale MSSM: SUSY Breaking Models III Parameter evolution: mass

  36. M1 0 -mZ cosb sinqW mZ cosb cosqW T ~TEW : scattering of H,W from background field MN = ~ ~ mZ sinb sinqW M2 -mZ sinb sinqW 0 CPV 0 -m -mZ cosb sinqW mZ cosb cosqW -m T << TEW : mixing of H,W to c+, c0 mZ sinb sinqW -mZ sinb sinqW 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ M2 • = N11B 0 + N12W 0 + N13Hd0 + N14Hu0 MC = m T << TEW BINO WINO HIGGSINO Gaugino-Higgsino Mixing Chargino Mass Matrix Neutralino Mass Matrix

  37. M1 0 -mZ cosb sinqW mZ cosb cosqW MN = mZ sinb sinqW M2 -mZ sinb sinqW 0 0 -m -mZ cosb sinqW mZ cosb cosqW -m T << TEW : mixing of H,W to c+, c0 mZ sinb sinqW -mZ sinb sinqW 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ • = N11B 0 + N12W 0 + N13Hd0 + N14Hu0 BINO WINO HIGGSINO + res + coannihilation Relic Abundance of SUSY DM Neutralino Mass Matrix

  38. T ~TEW : scattering of fL, fR from background field ~ ~ T << TEW : mixing of fL, fR to f1, f2 ~ ~ Qf < 0 Qf > 0 ~ ~ Sfermion Mixing Sfermion mass matrix

  39. “Superpotential” : a convenient way to derive supersymmetric interactions by taking derivatives w.r.t. scalar fields Test ~ 100 new parameters 40 new CPV phases Flavor mixing parameters No new coupling constants Two Higgs vevs Supersymmetric Higgs mass, 

  40. Normalize to G: Remove r Vertex & ext leg Neutral Current Interactions II Neutral current l+f --> l+f at one loop: Normalization: Vector & axial vector couplings: Weak mixing:

  41. The  parameter: Weak mixing: Can impose constraints from global fits to EWPO via S,T,U-dependence of these quantities

More Related