1 / 36

ISMD 2007

ISMD 2007. Berkeley, August 5-9 2007 Chairman: Nu Xu. Seria ISMD. Początek: Paryż 1970 (Lestienne,Salmeron, Sosnowski, Krzywicki + Wróblewski itd.), Helsinki 71, Zakopane 72 (Kraków-Warszawa), Pawia 73..., Tihany 2000, Datong 01, Alushta 02, Kraków 2003, Sonoma 04, Kromeriz 05, Parati 06

aelwen
Télécharger la présentation

ISMD 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISMD 2007 Berkeley, August 5-9 2007 Chairman: Nu Xu

  2. Seria ISMD • Początek: Paryż 1970 (Lestienne,Salmeron, Sosnowski, Krzywicki + Wróblewski itd.), Helsinki 71, Zakopane 72 (Kraków-Warszawa), Pawia 73..., Tihany 2000, Datong 01, Alushta 02, Kraków 2003, Sonoma 04, Kromeriz 05, Parati 06 • Nazwy zmienne, ale zawsze „multiparticle” (w latach 70’ mały margines fizyki cząstek)

  3. Program 1.Jet physics (Salgado, Takai) 7 referatów 2.Fluctuations and Correlations (Padula, Strickland, Soltz, Roland) 13 3.Small x and Diffraction (Kovchegov, Staśto) 10 4.Soft Interactions (Cebra, Soldner-Rembold) 10 5.Astroparticle Physics (Drescher, Huentemeyer) 6 6.Particle Propagating in Dense Matter (Casalderrey-Solana, Dremin, Jia, Fuqian Wang) 15 7.Heavy Quark Production (Bauer, Gary, Huang) 11

  4. Statystyka • Uczestnicy: 85, afiliacje: 44 USA, 11 RFN, 4 Brazylia, Rosja, 3 Polska, Włochy, 2 Czechy, Francja, Węgry, 1 Chiny, Holandia, Indie, Izrael, Japonia, Kanada, Słowacja, Szwajcaria, Szwecja, Ukraina. • Uwaga: afiliacje, nie narodowości! • Referaty: 73: 7+13+10+10+6+15+11+1.

  5. Polscy uczestnicy i referaty • D.Antończyk (Frankfurt), Z.Chajecki (Ohio), P.Danielewicz (Michigan), KF (UJ), A.Galas (IFJ), A.Kisiel (Ohio), R.Maj (AŚ), A.Staśto (Penn), M.Szuba (LBL)+B.Jacak,? • P.Danielewicz-imaging review (MSU) • A.Kisiel-STAR and Therminator (OSU) • A.Galas-production in DIS, gp from ep • KF-HERMES and absorption

  6. Co naprawdę nowego? • Astrocząstki: ograniczenie GZK działa, korelacje - źródła? • Asymetria eliptyczna: przyczynek korelacji • Korelacje 3-cząstkowe • Odkrycie Sb, Sb‘,Xb

  7. Ograniczenie GZK, klastry • Kai Martens (HiRes, U. of Utah) • Glennys Farrar (New York U.)

  8. Results from HiResand Observation of the GZK Suppression HR2 HR1 Kai Martens High Energy Astrophysics Institute Department of Physics, University of Utah for the HiRes Collaboration

  9. HiRes Monocular Spectra HR1: longer exposure  high energy HR2: larger elevation coverage  low energy data: HR1: 5/97-6/05 HR2: 12/99-8/04 • energy scale uncertainties: • missing energy 5% • energy loss rate 10% • fluorescence yield 6% • atmospheric conditions 4% • photometric calibration 10% • total (energy): 17% •  flux uncertainty: 30% (@ g=2.8) flux x E3

  10. avoid double counting: remove HR1 events that also are in the HR2 data set Old plots: AGASA AGASA (E–20%) Broken power-law fits: a.) one vs. two breakpoints: 2 reduced by 23.4  4.5s b.) compare measured data to red line extrapolation: expect: 39.9 observe: 13  4.8s (P=7x10-7) Quacks like duck, don’t it?

  11. HiRes Composition Guided Fits n flux • source model: all sources inject with Eg • g = 2.42 • uniform with redshift • evolution (1+z)m • m = 2.46 composition as measured ! future: astronomy inspired redshift evolution

  12. Rescaling energies to dip=> consistency! • Left: published spectra x E3 from different expts • Right: spectra after shifting energies by factors AG = 0.9; HR = 1.2; Yk = 0.75; Auger = 1.2 • Shift => consistent normalizations of all spectra, for Auger = 1.4. (HR = 1.2 + difference in AF yield assumptions => Auger ~ 1.35)

  13. UHECR multiplets • Cluster candidate in published AGASA-HiRes data: • 5 events, chance probability 2 10-3 • Energies (15), 38, 53, 55, 78 EeV (1 EeV = 1018 eV) • (b, l) =(55o,145o)(“Ursa Major Cluster”) • Projecting from AGASA-HiRes suggests with a dataset like Auger • 1 multiplet with 8-10 UHECRs  1 multiplet with ~ 6 UHECRs • 5 multiplets with ~ 4 UHECRs • Need good analysis tools to avoid using false multiplets. Maximum Likelihood method has been developed (GRF) • If(when!)such multiplets are found, they will give a powerful constraint on GMF and sources.

  14. Wnioski z astrofizyki • Ograniczenie GZK (strata energii w produkcji p na fotonach tła) jednak chyba działa, więc dziesiątki modeli zbędne. • Być może są klastry kierunkowe dla najwyższej energii (niezaburzone przez pole magnetyczne); Auger?

  15. Fig. 1. Layout of the Pierre Auger Southern Observatory The Pierre Auger Collaboration et al., Science 318, 938 -943 (2007) Published by AAAS

  16. Fig. 2. Aitoff projection of the celestial sphere in galactic coordinates with circles of radius 3.1{degrees} centered at the arrival directions of the 27 cosmic rays with highest energy detected by the Pierre Auger Observatory The Pierre Auger Collaboration et al., Science 318, 938 -943 (2007) Published by AAAS

  17. Azimuthal asymmetry – czy to naprawdę „elliptic flow”? • Rudy Hwa (Oregon U.) • Gunther Roland (STAR, MIT)

  18. Conclusion • Azimuthal anisotropy is mainly a ridge effect. No fast thermalization or hydrodynamical flow are needed. • Hydrodynamics may still be applicable after some time, but it is not needed for v2, for which the relevant physics at <1 fm/c is crucial --- semi-hard scattering at qT<3. • For pT<1.5 GeV/c, the analysis is simple, and the result can be expressed in analytic form that agrees with data. • For pT>1.5 GeV/c, shower partons must be considered. Jet dominance (>3GeV/c) will saturate v2. • No part of the study suggests that the medium behaves like a perfect fluid.

  19. STAR analysis • Znane efekty korelacyjne (clusters, minijets...) dają przyczynki do asymetrii azymutalnej niezwiązane z przepływem • Należy je odjąć przed porównaniem danych z modelami hydrodynamicznymi • STAR, PHOBOS (Krzysztof Woźniak)

  20. Nowe dane o korelacjach • Stefan Kniege (Frankfurt U., CERES) • Jason Ulery (Purdue U., STAR): • 3-particle correlations to discriminate between the models of „back” jet emission

  21. Summary • Non gaussian shape on the away side of • 2 particle correlation function • Shape of the correlation function for different charge • combinations indicate • charge ordering in the fragmentation process • Shape of the 3 particle correlations indicate cone like structure • on the away side of the jet Further investigations are needed to draw final conclusions

  22. Summary and Conclusions • Three 3-particle analyses at RHIC. • PHENIX Analysis • Shape consistent with conical emission simulation. • STAR Cumulant Analysis • Non-zero 3-particle correlations. • STAR 2-Component Analysis • Consistent with conical emission at about 1.45 radians in central Au+Au. • PT independent angle suggests Mach-cone emission.

  23. Odkrycie nowych pięknych barionów • W tablicach z 2006 roku tylko Lb • Teraz identyfikowane: Sb, Sb*, Xb, Wb • Tania Moulik (U. of Kansas, CDF+D0): przewidywania i wyniki doświadczalne

  24. Xb Results 15.2  4.4 Likelihood Fit Results : M (DØ) = 5774  11(stat.) 15 (syst.)MeV -- [1] M (CDF)= 5792.9  2.4(stat.) 1.7 (syst.) GeV ) – [2] (Theory : 5.793 - 5.814) 17.5  4.3 [1] PRL 99, 1052001 (2007) [2] arXiv:0707.0589

  25. Podsumowanie nowych barionów • Masy i rozpady +/- jak oczekiwano. • Dlaczego model kwarków działa tu tak dobrze?

  26. Zalecenia i perspektywy • Warto oglądnąć strony dostępne pod „Program” na stronie ISMD 2007 http://www-rnc.lbl.gov/ISMD/index.html • Następne ISMD w Hamburgu (DESY) w dniach 16-20.09.2008 (Hannes Jung + Gösta Gustafson), a przedtem • WPCF (Workshop on Particle Correlations and Femtoscopy) w Krakowie 10-14.09.08 (Andrzej Białas + KF, G.Miśkowiec etc. w OC, J.Pluta, K.Zalewski wśród conveners...)

More Related