1 / 15

Education 325: Assessment for Classroom Teaching

Education 325: Assessment for Classroom Teaching. G. Galy PhD Summer 2014 Week 6. Matching Format. Matching Format. Two lists: Premises (on left) and Responses (on right) Include an unequal number of Responses Arrange both columns in logical or alphabetical order Limit to 10

afi
Télécharger la présentation

Education 325: Assessment for Classroom Teaching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Education 325: Assessment for Classroom Teaching G. Galy PhD Summer 2014 Week 6

  2. Matching Format

  3. Matching Format • Two lists: Premises (on left) and Responses (on right) • Include an unequal number of Responses • Arrange both columnsin logical or alphabetical order • Limit to 10 • Used for matching: - Definitions/Terms - Dates - Principles - People - Classifications - Symbols - Descriptions - Parts/Functions

  4. Matching Checklist • Is ‘premise’ first, then ‘response’? • Is space for answers provided beside premise? • Do ‘responses’ out-number premises? • Did you use the ‘draw-a-line’ technique? If so, don’t!!! • Are premises and responses organized logically? • Are columns clearly labeled? • Can responses be used ‘once’ or ‘more than once’?

  5. Multiple Choice Format • Content Free Test

  6. Multiple Choice Format • Express as question or statement in ‘stem’ • One answer is provided with ‘plausible distracters’ • Usually 3-5. Why? • Guessing can still occur (reliability) • If critical thinking is the goal, more than one answer can be right, however, there must be one ‘best’ answer • Can be combined with graphs, charts, maps

  7. Multiple Choice Guidelines • Stem: - State in simple, clear language - State positively - Put as much information in the stem as possible • Answers should ‘flow’ with stem • Avoid cues (e.g. length of answer) and word clues • Use ‘None of the Above’ sparingly. Why? (Trickery) • Arrange in logical, alphabetical, chronological order • Limit to 5 alternatives

  8. Graphics Format

  9. Graphics Format • Do directions identify correct graphic? • Are directions clear? (especially if asked to create) • Is the graphic labeled clearly? • Has enough space been provided to answer question? • Is it clear how points are given or marks allocated?

  10. Graphics Format • Two basic forms: - Presentation - Production

  11. Essays • Require higher levels of Blooms’ Taxonomy (HOT) • Require students to: - collect facts - interpret & argue a point - analyze - explain differences - evaluate - form conclusions • Drawbacks: - time consuming - subjective (marking) How do you reduce marking subjectivity?

  12. Restricted Essay Example Question: Outline the three principle reasons for the demise of the USSR? Place the reasons in priority and explain each reason. Reasons 3x1= 3 marks Priority 3x1= 3 marks Explanation 3x3= 9 marks Total: 15 marks

  13. Extended Essay • Subjectivity is reduced when: - criteria is discussed - rubrics or rating scales are developed (preferably as a class) - samples are reviewed, critiqued Objective?

  14. Essay Guidelines • Question stated clearly? • Do directions clearly indicate how marks are awarded? • Is a scoring guide or rubric provided? • Is grammar, punctuation and presentation marked?

  15. “Live” Session

More Related