1 / 19

Chapter 10 Mediation

Chapter 10 Mediation. Class 6 Spring 2013 Ang & Huan (2006) . Moderator vs. Mediator. Moderator variable (“ separator ”) When or for whom a variable X most strongly predicts an outcome (criterion) variable Y (strength and direction + or -) Mediator

aislin
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 10 Mediation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 10 Mediation Class 6 Spring 2013 Ang &Huan (2006)

  2. Moderator vs. Mediator Moderator variable (“separator”) When or for whom a variable X most strongly predicts an outcome (criterion) variable Y (strength and direction + or -) Mediator The mechanism by which a predictor causes or explains the outcome

  3. Moderation Analyses: Regression Predictor Moderator Outcome Predictor X Moderator High M Low M

  4. Mediation Establishes Howor Why a variable causes or predicts the criterion (or outcome) variable. Mediator is the mechanism by which predictor causes or explains the outcome Predictor -------------------------------Outcome Predictor --------- Mediator---Outcome Parent Drinking----F. Conflict -Low Self Esteem

  5. MediationThe Beginning Model c Y X

  6. The Mediational Model M b a c' Y X

  7. The Mediational Model Family Conflict b a C’ Parent Drinking Low Self-Esteem

  8. Baron and Kenny Steps • X  Y (test path c) • M (test path a) • M (and X)  Y (test path b) • X (and M)  Y (test path c′ ) Analyses 3 and 4 use the same regression equation.

  9. Hierarchical regressions analyses to test mediation Reg. 1PredictorOutcome Prnt. Drinking ------ c ---- Low Self Esteem Reg 2 PredictorMediator Prnt. Drinking ------ a ------ Family Conflict Reg 3 MediatorOutcome Family Conflict ----- b ----- Low Self-Esteem (controlling for Predictor – Parent Drinking) Reg 3 Predictor----Mediator ------Outcome Prnt. Drinking -- Fam. Conflict ------  Low Self Esteem C’

  10. Regressions Mediation Analyses:Criterion:OutcomeLow Self EsteemReg 1(Path c) Reg 1B β ΔR2 R2

  11. Hierarchical Regression Mediation Analyses: Criterion: Low Self Esteem (Paths b and C’)Reg 3B β ΔR2 R2

  12. Hierarchical Regression Mediation Analyses: Criterion: Low Self Esteem (Partial Moderation Reg 3A) B β ΔR2 R2

  13. Sobel Test Calculatorhttp://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm Whether the indirect effect of the predictor on the criterion via the mediator is significantly different from zero Numbers needed a = raw (unstandardized) regression coefficient for the association between predictor and mediator. sa = standard error of a. b = raw coefficient for the association between the mediator and the outcome (when the predictor is also a predictor of the DV). sb = standard error of b.

  14. Ang & Huan(2012) b a c

  15. Ang & Huan(2012) Depression b a c Suicidal Ideation Academic stress

  16. Mediation Model Ang & Huan (2006)

  17. Strength of Mediated Effect Sobel Test- Indicated if change in academic stressBs from Path c to path c’ is statistically significant Shrout & Bolger (2002) Proportion of relation of academic stress to suicide ideation that is mediated by depression Calculated from the unstandardized Bs for paths ab& c; requires a sample size of about 500 ab/c = ( ) ( )/ ( ) = ( ) / ( ) = .7390 = 74%

  18. Strength of Mediated Effect Sobel Test- Indicated if change in academic stressBs from Path c to path c’ is statistically significant Shrout & Bolger (2002) Proportion of relation of academic stress to suicide ideation that is mediated by depression ab/c = (.12) (2.71)/.44 = .3252/.44 = .7390 = 74%

More Related