1 / 22

Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F. Skjoldan 7 January 2009

Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F. Skjoldan 7 January 2009. Presentation. Ph.D. project ”Aeroservoelastic stability analysis and design of wind turbines” Collaboration between Siemens Wind Power A/S Risø DTU - National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy. Outline.

aitana
Télécharger la présentation

Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F. Skjoldan 7 January 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic RotorsPeter F. Skjoldan7 January 2009

  2. Presentation • Ph.D. project ”Aeroservoelastic stability analysis and design of wind turbines” • Collaboration betweenSiemens Wind Power A/SRisø DTU - National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy

  3. Outline • Motivations • Wind turbine model • Modal analysis • Results for isotropic rotor • Analysis methods for anisotropic rotor • Results for anisotropic rotor • Conclusions and future work

  4. Motivations • Far goal: build stability tool compatible with aeroelastic model used in industry • Conventional wind turbine stability tools consider isotropic conditions • Load calculations are performed in anisotropic conditions • Method of Coleman transformation works only in isotropic conditions • Alternative 1: Floquet analysis • Alternative 2: Hill’s method • Effect of anisotropy on the modal dynamics

  5. Model of wind turbine • 3 DOF on rotor (blade flap), 2 DOF on support (tilt and yaw) • Structrual model (no aerodynamics), no gravity • Blade stiffnesses can be varied to give rotor anisotropy

  6. Modal analysis • Modal analysis of wind turbine in operation • Operating point defined by a constant mean rotor speed • Time-invariant system needed for eigenvalue analysis • Coordinate transformation to yield time-invariance • Modal frequencies, damping, eigenvectors / periodic mode shapes • Describes motion for small perturbations around operating point

  7. Floquet theory • Solution to a linear system with periodic coefficients: periodic mode shape oscillating term • Describes solution form for all methods in this paper

  8. Coleman transformation • Introduces multiblade coordinates on rotor • Describes rotor as a whole in the inertial frame instead of individual blades in the rotating frame • Yields time-invariant system if rotor is isotropic • Modal analysis performed by traditional eigenvalue analysis of system matrix

  9. Results for isotropic rotor • 1st forward whirling modal solution Time domain Frequency domain

  10. Floquet analysis • Numerical integration of system equations gives fundamental solution and monodromy matrix • Lyapunov-Floquet transformation yields time-invariant system • Modal frequencies and damping found from eigenvalues of Rwith non-unique frequency • Periodic mode shapes

  11. Hill’s method • Solution form from Floquet theory • Fourier expansion of system matrix and periodic mode shape(in multiblade coordinates) • Inserted into equations of motion • Equate coefficients of equal harmonic terms

  12. Hill’s method • Hypermatrix eigenvalue problem

  13. Hill’s method • Eigenvalues of hypermatrix • Multiple eigenvalues for each physical mode 2 additional harmonic terms(n = 2)

  14. Identification of modal frequency • Non-unique frequencies and periodic mode shapes • Modal frequency is chosen such that the periodic mode shape isas constant as possible in multiblade coordinates Floquet analysis Hill’s method n = 2 Amplitude Amplitude j j

  15. Comparison of methods • Convergence of eigenvalues Floquet analysis Hill’s method

  16. Comparison of methods • Floquet analysis: Mode shapes in time domain + Nonlinear model can be used directly to provide fundamental solutions – Slow (numerical integration) • Hill’s method: Mode shapes in frequency domain + Fast (pure eigenvalue problem) + Accuracy increased by using Coleman transformation – Eigenvalue problem can be very large • Frequency non-uniqueness can be resolved using a common approach

  17. Results for anisotropic rotor • Blade 1 is 16% stiffer than blades 2 and 3 • Small change in frequencies compared to isotropic rotor • Larger effect on damping of some modes

  18. Results for anisotropic rotor • 1st backward whirling mode, Fourier coefficients Blade 116% stiffer than blades 2 and 3

  19. Results for anisotropic rotor • Symmetric mode, Fourier coefficients Blade 116% stiffer than blades 2 and 3

  20. Results for anisotropic rotor • 2nd yaw mode, Fourier coefficients Blade 116% stiffer than blades 2 and 3

  21. Conclusions • Isotropic rotor: Coleman transformation yields time-invariant systemMotion with at most three harmonic components • Anisotropic rotor: Floquet analysis or Hill’s methodMotion with many harmonic components • These methods give similar resultsFrequency non-uniqueness resolved using a common approach • Anisotropy affects some modes more:whirling / low damping / low frequency ? • Additional harmonic components on anisotropic rotor are smallbut might have significant effect when coupled to aerodynamics

  22. Further work • Set up full finite element model and obtain linearized system • Apply Floquet analysis or Hill’s method to full model • Compare anisotropy in the rotating frame (rotor imbalance) and in the inertial frame (wind shear, yaw/tilt misalignment, gravity, tower shadow)

More Related