1 / 15

The "Carbon Bathtub"

Exploring the flawed reasoning behind complacency about climate change and the importance of understanding dynamic complex problems. Learn about the "Carbon Bathtub" analogy and the need to reduce CO2 emissions.

akatherine
Télécharger la présentation

The "Carbon Bathtub"

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The "Carbon Bathtub" Bob Powell, Ph.D. physics, MBAexponentialimprovement.com

  2. Understanding complacency about climate change • Professors John Sterman (MIT) and David Archer (U of Chicago) find flawed reasoning at the root of complacencyhttp://mitsloan.mit.edu/newsroom/2008-climatechange.php. • Humans don’t naturally understand dynamically complex problems or how to deal with them. • What’s called “common sense” is most often wrong for such problems. • Testing grad students at MIT found they don’t understand “bathtub dynamics”.

  3. The "Carbon Bathtub"http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/big-idea/05/carbon-bathGraphic: Nigel Holmes. Sources: John Sterman, MIT; David Archer, University of Chicago; Global Carbon Project FAUCET(HUMAN EMISSIONS) DRAIN(CARBON SINKS DRAIN(CARBON SINKS DRAIN(CARBON SINKS) BATHTUB(ATMOSPHERE)

  4. How do we cause CO2 emissions? Faucet: Four-fifths is from burning fossil fuels. Nearly all the rest is from deforestation and other changes in land use.

  5. Where does our CO2 go? Drain: Plants and soil absorb about a third each year, and ocean surface waters about a quarter. The rest – about 1/2 -- stays airborne for a long time. 45% remains in atmosphere 30% absorbed by plants & soils 25% absorbed by oceans (turning acidic) <1% reabsorbed by sediments & rocks

  6. How much CO2 is too much? In the tub: No one is sure. Some scientists think we need to reduce the CO2 level back down to 350 parts per million (ppm) to avoid serious climate impacts. 450 projectedbefore mid-century 404 – Apr 2015386 -- 2008 average 299 -- highest ice core reading (333,000 yrs ago) 271 -- preindustrial level

  7. How does CO2 cause warming? CO2 absorbs some of the heat radiation coming off Earth's sunbaked surface and reradiates it back downward.

  8. And That’s The Problem • More heat is retained by the earth than is reflected back into space. • 350 ppm is believed to be sustainable without damage to earth’s ecosystems and without significant sea level rise. • It’s now at ~404 ppm • The physics of the system:At these levels global warming will continue • … as in a greenhouse.

  9. What if we stop increasing emissions? That’s NOT ENOUGH. Even at the current emissions rate, CO2 is released Into the atmosphere nearly twice as fast as it is removed -- so the bathtub will continue to fill.

  10. What does this mean? • Because we’re releasing CO2 into the atmosphere nearly twice as fast as it is removed • We must cut CO2 emissions in halfto stop levels from increasing. • Most grad students at MIT get this wrong • They think stopping the increase is enough.

  11. Objection: CO2 Levels • But CO2 levels have been this high before! • Those who say this don’t talk about how many species went extinct because of it. • They don’t talk about what sea levels were at the time. • In Florida, they’re so afraid of talking about sea level rise, those in government are banned from using the terms “global warming” and “climate change”.

  12. Objection: But China! • Try going to a Lowe’s to buy something not from China. • China is our problem. Corporations offshore jobs to increase profits … • … and Americans let that happen. • What’s called “trade” is mostly the “transfer of the factors of production”: we need “balanced trade” not “free trade”.

  13. Objection: “Global Cooling”! http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/ http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-not-slowing-its-speeding-up.html

  14. This is Serious, We must act: NOW

  15. If all the ice melts, Florida and much of the coast is gone.http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/09/rising-seas/if-ice-melted-map

More Related