1 / 9

Foundations of AI

Foundations of AI. Is Weak and Strong AI possible? Chinese Room Experiment. Introduction. Philosophers have formed two hypothesis: Weak hypothesis. Can machines act intelligently? b. Strong hypothesis. Do machines actually think? Or do they simulate thinking?.

alaqua
Télécharger la présentation

Foundations of AI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Foundations of AI • Is Weak and Strong AI possible? • Chinese Room Experiment

  2. Introduction • Philosophers have formed two hypothesis: • Weak hypothesis. • Can machines act intelligently? • b. Strong hypothesis. • Do machines actually think? • Or do they simulate thinking?

  3. Weak Hypothesis Alan Turing in his paper: “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” suggested a test to decide if a computer can think or not. Person? Computer? (test lasts 5 minutes; success: 30% of the time the interrogator is fooled).

  4. First Objection Against “Weak AI” • Disability. Machines can’t do X. • Machines can do many things: • Play chess, inspect parts on assembly lines, • check spelling, steer cars and helicopters, • diagnose diseases, create new music, and even • create art (see http://www.ramos.nl/yyfire.html ) • .

  5. Second Objection 2. Mathematical Objection. Machines are limited by the “Incompleteness Theorem”. Let F by a formal axiomatic system powerful enough to do arithmetic.

  6. “Powerful Formal Systems are limited by Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem”: • We can construct a Gödel sentence G(F) such that: • G(F) is a sentence of F, but cannot be proved by F. • If F is consistent, then G(F) is true. • Consequence: Whatever formal system we choose • there are things that cannot be proven by the formal • system although they are true! Second Objection (continued) Counter Argument: It is not clear why there are not similar limitations on what humans can prove; moreover, the argument only applies to formal systems. Controversy includes the books by Roger Penrose.

  7. Soft Computing Researchers might agree and claim that this is a problem of “old AI” Third Objection 3. Informality. “We cannot capture human behavior as a set of logical rules” Known as the “Qualification Problem” in AI. Hubert Dreyfus: “What Computers Can’t do” “Mind over Machine” (but no suggestions are made on how to solve the problem)

  8. Strong Hypothesis ---Machines can “really think” • Attack against AI: machines do not actually • think but only simulate thinking. • Turing: we are interested in creating • machines that behave intelligently. • Quote textbook p. 953

  9. Chinese Room Thought Experiment John Searle (1980): “Running the right program does not necessarily create understanding” Chinese Chinese Stack of paper Memory Answer Question Rule Book that says in English what to do if a matching Chinese Symbol is encountered Human Being Only speaks English, but Is capable to perform the instuctions in the rulebook CPU Program Searle argues neither the rule book nor the human being understands Chinese, therefore: running the right program does not necessarily create understanding  refuting “strong AI”; argument does not deny that “machines have minds”

More Related