1 / 5

SUB-IP PROTECTION MECHANISMS BENCHMARKING (Proposed WG Item)

SUB-IP PROTECTION MECHANISMS BENCHMARKING (Proposed WG Item) draft-poretsky-protection-term-00.txt draft-poretsky-mpls-protection-meth-04.txt + more Numerous Author Teams. 64th IETF Meeting – Vancouver.

alban
Télécharger la présentation

SUB-IP PROTECTION MECHANISMS BENCHMARKING (Proposed WG Item)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SUB-IP PROTECTION MECHANISMS BENCHMARKING (Proposed WG Item) draft-poretsky-protection-term-00.txt draft-poretsky-mpls-protection-meth-04.txt + more Numerous Author Teams 64th IETF Meeting – Vancouver

  2. Karthik and have posted comments to mailing list for existing terminology and methodology Karthik and have expressed interest in authoring two new methodologies as part of this work item Draft methodologies are completed and approaching readiness for WG review Status Terminology For Protection Benchmarking draft-kimura-protection-term-01.txt Terminology For Protection Benchmarking draft-poretsky-protection-term-00.txt Created single work item with common Terminology Methodology For MPLS Protection Benchmarking draft-poretsky-mpls-protection-meth-03.txt Methodology For MPLS Protection Benchmarking draft-poretsky-mpls-protection-meth-04.txt Received numerous comments for additional test cases and benchmarking metrics Methodology For Stateful Failover Benchmarking draft-karthik-sso-meth-00.txt (pending) Methodology For Protected MPLS VPN Benchmarking draft-karthik-protected-mplsvpn-meth-00.txt (pending)

  3. draft-poretsky-protection-term-00.txt Poretsky (Reef Point) and Kimura (NTT) draft-kimura-protection-term-01.txt Kimura (NTT) and Perser draft-poretsky-mpls-protection-meth-04.txt Poretsky (Reef Point), Papneja (Isocore), Le Roux (FTT) Thorough review by Ina Minei (Juniper) and others Fast Reroute now RFC 4090 draft-ldp-over-rsvp-protection-meth-00.txt (pending) Karthik (Cisco) and Papneja (Isocore) draft-karthik-sso-meth-00.txt (pending) Karthik (Cisco), Brendel (Chiaro), and Papneja (Isocore) Author Teams

  4. The IP network layer provides route convergence to protect data traffic against planned and unplanned failures in the internet. BWMG has work items to address convergence benchmarking. Technologies that function at sub-IP layers can be enabled to provide protection of IP traffic Sub-IP protection mechanisms include High Availability (HA) stateful failover, Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP), Automatic Protection Switching (APS) for SONET/SDH, Fast Reroute for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS), and others. The metrics for benchmarking the performance of sub-IP protection mechanisms can be measured at the IP layer, so that the results are always measured in reference to IP and independent of the specific protection mechanism being used. Enables different protection mechanisms to be benchmarked and compared Enables different implementations of the same protection mechanism to be benchmarked and compared It is intended that there can exist unique methodology documents for each sub-IP protection mechanism, such as MPLS Fast Reroute. Scope of Work Item

  5. Appears to be significant interest in BMWG to author *and review* documents for Sub-IP Protection Mechanisms Benchmarking work item Is there interest to make this a BMWG work item? Next Steps

More Related