E N D
1. Nicola Lugaresilugaresi@jus.unitn.itUniversity of TrentoEUROPEAN UNION VS SPAM: A LEGAL RESPONSE
First Conference on Email
and Anti-Spam (CEAS)
Mountain View, CA, July30-31, 2004
WHY FIGHTING SPAM?WHY FIGHTING SPAM?
2. MY PARENTS WERE EXCITEDMY PARENTS WERE EXCITED
3. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 3 WHY LAW? Social norms failed
Market failed
Self-regulation failed
Self-help failed (and it isnt unfair to rely on it)
Code (has) failed (hasnt it?)
Law wants to have its chance to fail how?
Lack of jurisdiction and/or international co-operation
Lack of enforcement
Lack of coordination with other regulatory tools
Bad laws
4. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 4 WHY EU LAW?
Practical goal: fight spam
Ethical goal: protect privacy (and state its relevance)
Political goal: not just trail US, lead sometimes
5. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 5 EU APPROACH Opt-in (prior consent of the subscriber)
Soft opt-in (in the context of a sale; similar products; same company; opportunity to object)
Prohibition of disguising or concealing the identity of the sender
Valid address to which send the request to cease further communication
Sufficient protection of legitimate interests of legal persons by Member States (opt-in or opt-out) MORE IN THE PAPER
Subscriber and/or user; if possible technically, procedurally, contractuallyMORE IN THE PAPER
Subscriber and/or user; if possible technically, procedurally, contractually
6. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 6 OTHER TOOLS Labels, but what about jurisdiction and enforcement?
Registries, but why an opt-out register (burden, danger)?
Spam boxes, but enforcement agencies will follow up?
Codes of conduct, but are we dealing with self-regulating guys?
Not good for all the spam
7. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 7 ANTI-SPAM LAW MODELS EU MODEL
OPT-IN
Short regulation
Simple regulation
First e-mail outlawed
No burden on the recipient
Analogy with faxes & ACM
Protects privacy
US MODEL
OPT-OUT
Long regulation
Complicated regulation
First e-mail allowed
Burden on the recipient
Differs from faxes & ACM
Protects proprietary interests
8. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 8 SPORT OF SPAM Giudice di pace, Napoli (7-10 June 2004)
Privacy
Violates data protection (unfair processing)
Invasion of the private sphere: not Let alone
1000 + 750 to an individual Tribunal de Commerce, Paris (5 May 2004)
Property
Breach of contract
Damage the image of the credibility of anti-spam measures
5000 + 3000 to Microsoft and AOL
9. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 9 WHAT IS SPAM?Unsolicited, commercial, bulk, e-mail? EU
Unsolicited (everything before opt-in)
Direct marketing
Single e-mail
Other unsolicited communications (SMS MMS) US
Unopposed (everything after opt-out)
Commercial
Multiple e-mail
Specific to e-mail
10. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 10 KINDS OF SPAM Borderline (soft) spam
Reputable and/or accountable and/or traceable business
Comply in case of opt-out
Opt-in / opt-out regulations: effective Professional (hard) spam
Internet only spam-oriented non-easily traceable business
Deceive in case of opt-out
Opt-in / opt-out regulations: ineffective
11. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 11 THE ROLE OF THE LAW Distinguish kinds of spam: different phenomena, different legal responses
Reduce the burden on the user (time, software, internalization of research costs)
Intervene on the economic bases of hard spam
Isolate the deceptive spam, promoting social awareness: lower the reading ratio
Harmonize international approaches
Co-ordinate itself with other fields of expertise
12. Nicola Lugaresi CEAS 2004 12