1 / 11

Peripheral tolerance and Immunoregulation.

Peripheral tolerance and Immunoregulation. Dr. C. Piccirillo Canada Research Chair Department of Microbiology & Immunology McGill University MIMM-414A Lecture 1- Oct. 20, 2006 Why T cell regulation?

albert
Télécharger la présentation

Peripheral tolerance and Immunoregulation.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peripheral tolerance and Immunoregulation. Dr. C. Piccirillo Canada Research Chair Department of Microbiology & Immunology McGill University MIMM-414A Lecture 1- Oct. 20, 2006

  2. Why T cell regulation? How does the immune system prevent self-reactivity while maintaining reactivity to invaders/non-self? T cell regulation in the absence of regulatory T cells? • Suppression of autoreactive T cells • Control immunity to enteric bacteria • Limit histopathology

  3. Self/non-self discrimination • Turn of the 20th century 1901: Ehrlich and Morgenroth • Immunized goats with RBC from another goat to conclude that host immune responses respond to foreign antigens. • They coined the Latin phrase: horror autoxicus • Why did the goats develop autoAb to their own RBC? • 1938- Traub induced tolerance by injecting LCMV in utero into mice producing an infection that was long-lived in life. • 1949- Macfarlane Burnet: postulated that the age of the animal at the time of the first encounter with antigen was the critical determinant in the induction of tolerance. • 1953: Medawar induced immune tolerance to skin allografts in mice by neonatal injection of allogeneic cells. • Prevention or failure to mount response to self-components?

  4. Immunological tolerance A state of functional unresponsiveness for a particular antigen. May occur in the context of a non-inflammatory immune response. Tolerance is an active process.

  5. Central tolerance largely controls self / non-self discrimination. • Thymic deletional processes are inefficient. • Moderate-high affinity TCR/pMHC interactions --> clonal deletion • Low-moderate TCR/pMHC interactions -> selection • No interaction- neglect and death • BMDC involved in clonal deletion (cortico-medullary junction) • T cell maturational state is important (nature,site and how) • Role of AIRE (AutoImmune Regulator) • Autoreactive T cells leave thymus and exist in periphery. • Absence of disease suggests mechanism of active suppression.

  6. Multiple mechanisms ensure peripheral T cell tolerance. • Ignorance: anatomy, lymphatics, Ag crypticity, privilege • Deletion : cross-presentation of Ag by BMDC results in death (eg;CD8+) • Anergy: Insufficient co-stimulation on self-tissues • Clonal exhaustion: CD8+ T cells in chronic viral infections • Immune deviation: shift from inflammatory to anti-inflammatory cytokine production (eg; Th1-Th2). • Activation-induced cell death (AICD): Fas/FasL (IL-2) = Death Peripheral tolerance is an adaptable process.

  7. Tolerance to Self Antigen • Antigen sequestration (lens of eye, spermatozoa) • Low MHC expression (i.e. hepatocytes) Immune Response to Foreign Antigens • Influence of Antigen Dose (low zone, high zone), timing/duration of exposure, routes, nature of antigen, protein > CHO >> lipids, presence of adjuvants • Influence of Antibody feedback inhibition (IgG inhibits IgM), differential antigen binding affinity • Factors favoring tolerance • Age, neurological and endocrine factors, Nutritional status, MHC • Haplotypes

  8. Acquired Tolerance • In many cases, experimental unresponsiveness may be mediated by suppressor (T) cells, which actively prevent an immune response. • Original experiments of Gershon and Kondo (1970) showed that T cells were required for tolerance induction. Moreover, T cells from tolerant mice suppressed B cells from normal mice. • Active suppression by T cells also seen in some responses under Ir gene control and in the regulation of IgE responses (Tada). • Suppression commonly induced by systemic administration of antigen-coupled to self cells; route of injection is important (i.v. favors; intradermal gives contact sensitization). • Suppressor T cells produce factors. These factors may act directly on T/B targets. • Can be adaptively transferred.

  9. Infamous Suppressor T cells • Suppressor or Regulatory lymphocytes • Patrol periphery, silencing self-reactive T cells and maintain tolerance. • 1970’s-early 80’s • Gershon, Kondo, Tada….. • Taboo of T “suppressor” cells • CD8+ • Complex regulatory networks mapping to I-J (within the MHC) • Molecular cloning of TCR and MHC disappointed in T cell hybridomas secreting “suppressor factors” • No identifiable cell surface marker • No clone or cell lines with suppressor activity • No antigen specific suppressor factor gene identified • Transient phenotype

  10. The reincarnation of the suppressor T cell More questions than answers. Questions ? n Number of publications * 1 1995 - Present Answers

  11. A network of CD4+ regulatory T cells control immune reponses. Thymic CD4+ T cell pool Thymically-derived naturally-occurring CD4+CD25+ Treg cells (nTreg ) Peripherally-induced CD4+ Treg cells ( iTreg ) Foxp3+ GITR+ CTLA-4+ CD25+ TCR TCR + Peripheral differentiation signals CD25 GITR CTLA-4 Foxp3 CD25 +/- GITR +/- CTLA-4 +/- Foxp3 +/- APC _ _ Activated Effector T cell Autoimmunity Transplantation Tumor Immunity Infectious disease Piccirillo et al. Trends in Immunol. 2004.

More Related