1 / 11

Biostatistics Case Studies 2010

Biostatistics Case Studies 2010. Session 4: Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests. Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician http://gcrc.labiomed.org/biostat. Question #1. Question #2. N=40 Pheo and N=100 Not Pheo + Pred Value = + Cases / + Preds = 40/140=29%

albin
Télécharger la présentation

Biostatistics Case Studies 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Biostatistics Case Studies 2010 Session 4: Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician http://gcrc.labiomed.org/biostat

  2. Question #1

  3. Question #2 N=40 Pheo and N=100 Not Pheo + Pred Value = + Cases / + Preds = 40/140=29% – Pred Value = – Cases / – Preds = ? Pred Values depend on population prevalence

  4. Pred Values depend on population prevalence: + Pred Value = + Cases / + Preds – Pred Value = – Cases / – Preds Not necessarily generalizable Clinically useful Sensitivity and Specificity do not depend on population prevalence: Sensitivity = + Preds / + Cases Specificity = – Preds / – Cases Generalizable Not as clinically useful

  5. Question #3

  6. Question #3 CGA moderate, say 300 Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve CGA low, say 100 AUC = 50% CGA high, say 1000 Area under ROC curve for CGA = Probability that a case has a higher value for CGA than a non-case.

  7. Question #4 • General criteria for comparing 2 diagnostic tests: • for screening: sensitivity • (2) for follow-up diagnosis: specificity or area • (3) without priority being given to sensitivity or specificity: area under ROC curve

  8. Question #5 Likelihood Ratios: + Preds / + Cases + Likelihood Ratio = + Preds / - Cases - Preds / - Cases – Likelihood Ratio = - Preds / + Cases So, +LR is how much more likely a case will test positive, relative to a non-case.

  9. Question #5 More Useful Interpretation: Post-test Odds of Case + Likelihood Ratio = Pre-test Odds of Case Post-test Odds of Non-case – Likelihood Ratio = Pre-test Odds of Non-case Like sensitivity or specificity, likelihood ratios do not depend on population prevalence and they are also more clinically useful.

  10. Question #6 CGA>270 may have been chosen to maximize the + likelihood ratio.

  11. Question #7

More Related