1 / 61

Restitution

Restitution. Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011. Restitution. Cotnam v. Wisdom. Procedural history?. Cotnam v. Wisdom. Procedural history? Plaintiff wins below (jury trial) Judgment below reversed and remanded. Cotnam v. Wisdom. What is an “intestate”?. Cotnam v. Wisdom.

alec
Télécharger la présentation

Restitution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

  2. Restitution

  3. Cotnam v. Wisdom • Procedural history?

  4. Cotnam v. Wisdom • Procedural history? • Plaintiff wins below (jury trial) • Judgment below reversed and remanded

  5. Cotnam v. Wisdom • What is an “intestate”?

  6. Cotnam v. Wisdom • What is the holding in this case?

  7. Cotnam v. Wisdom • What is the holding in this case? • Plaintiff/Doctor is owed reasonable compensation for services rendered; remanded for retrial on issue of proper amount of damages

  8. Why no contract?

  9. Jury instruction # 2 • What was it?

  10. Jury instruction # 2 • What was it? • “Character and importance of operation and decedent’s ability to pay are elements to be considered in determining what is a reasonable charge . . .”

  11. Jury instruction # 2 • What was wrong with it?

  12. Sceva v. True - guidance • What categories of contracts are discussed in the Sceva case?

  13. Sceva v. True - guidance • What categories of contracts are discussed in the Sceva case? • “necessaries furnished to [a legally incompetent person] may be liable in assumpsit . . .” • P. 107

  14. Varieties of K’s • Explicit oral or written K • “Implied in fact” K

  15. Varieties of K’s • Explicit oral or written K • “Implied in fact” K • “Quasi-contract” or Implied in Law Contract

  16. Implied in law Ks • Why a “legal fiction”?

  17. Jury instruction # 2 • What was wrong with it? • Bottom 108: relevant only if there is a contract . . .

  18. What is the proper measure of recovery? • A “reasonable compensation for the services rendered . . .”

  19. Why the emphasis on Dr/patient cases? • What is unique? • Professionals expect compensation • Compare Mills v. Wyman

  20. Restitution Rest. 1st of Restitution § 112 comment a – the case of the hopeful home improver

  21. Restatement 3d Restitution – Tentative Draft 2010 §1 (3) There is no liability in restitution for an unrequested benefit voluntarily conferred, unless the circumstances of the transaction justify the claimant's intervention in the absence of contract.

  22. Indiana Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. Reinsurance Results, Inc., 513 F.3d 652 (7th Cir. 2008) (Posner, J.) If while you are sitting on your porch sipping Margaritas a trio of itinerant musicians serenades you with mandolin, lute, and hautboy, you have no obligation, in the absence of a contract, to pay them for their performance no matter how much you enjoyed it . . . .

  23. Contract is incomparably superior to restitution as a means of regulating most voluntary transfers because it eliminates, or minimizes, the fundamental difficulty of valuation…. The consequence for the law of restitution is that restitution is not normally available to the claimant who should have made a contract with the recipient but failed to do so. -- Rest. Restitution, TD, § 1, comment f

  24. § 371. Measure Of Restitution Interest • If a sum of money is awarded to protect a party's restitution interest, it may as justice requires be measured by either • (a) the reasonable value to the other party of what he received in terms of what it would have cost him to obtain it from a person in the claimant's position, or • (b) the extent to which the other party's property has been increased in value or his other interests advanced.

  25. Restatement (Third) of Restitution And Unjust Enrichment (TentativeDraft)2005 § 1. Restitution And Unjust Enrichment A person who is unjustly enriched at the expense of another is liable in restitution to the other.

  26. § 1 Illustration 4. Acting in an emergency and with no opportunity to contract, A provides medical services to B. A does not intend to act gratuitously and plans to seek compensation later. The circumstances of the transaction make it one in which the law permits A to assert that he did not intend to make B a gift of services.

  27. R3d Restit. TD § 20. Protection Of Another's Life Or Health A person who performs, supplies, or obtains professional services reasonably necessary for the protection of another's life or health has a claim in restitution against the other if the circumstances justify the claimant's decision to intervene without a prior agreement for payment or reimbursement. Restitution under this Section is measured by a reasonable charge for the services provided.

  28. Schott v. Westinghouse

  29. Collana v. Oak Park Homes

  30. What was the K in Collano?

  31. What was the K in Collano? • Between Callano and Bruce Pendergast

  32. How did Oak Park Homes enter the scene?

  33. How did Oak Park Homes enter the scene? • Why no contract action between Callano and Oak Park Homes?

  34. Promise to install shrubs Callanos Bruce Pender-gast $$

  35. Why not sue Pendergast/Grantges?

  36. Promise to install shrubs Callanos Bruce Pender-gast $$

  37. Callanos Oakwood Park Homes

  38. “Privity of Contract” Callanos Oakwood Park Homes

More Related