1 / 23

NON-SUICIDAL SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIORS (NSSI) Imelda V. G. Villar, Ph. D.

NON-SUICIDAL SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIORS (NSSI) Imelda V. G. Villar, Ph. D. DEFINITION. Direct, deliberate, self-inflicted damaging of tissue Without intent to die and without social sanction Superficial/moderate amount of tissue damage

alika-dyer
Télécharger la présentation

NON-SUICIDAL SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIORS (NSSI) Imelda V. G. Villar, Ph. D.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NON-SUICIDAL SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIORS(NSSI)Imelda V. G. Villar, Ph. D.

  2. DEFINITION • Direct, deliberate, self-inflicted damaging of tissue • Without intent to die and without social sanction • Superficial/moderate amount of tissue damage • Not associated with neurological illness, developmental disorder (Klonsky & Glenn, 2007)

  3. COMMON METHODS • Cutting, burning, hitting, needle pricking, hair pulling, obstructing wound healing, severe scratching • Cutting often identified as most common method • Most employ multiple methods (Briere & Gil, 1998; Nock et al., 2006; Ross & Heath, 2002)

  4. FUNCTIONS OF BEHAVIOR • “After I have harmed myself, I feel a lot calmer and relaxed, as if I’ve got the bad out.” (Harris, 2000, p. 167) • Tension reduction • Influencing social exchanges • Expression of self-punishment (Briere & Gil, 1998; Nock et al., 2006; Ross & Heath, 2002)

  5. CHARACTERISTICS OF PERPETRATORS • Low self-esteem and self-criticism • Felt unloved or rejected as children • Expressing anger toward others perceived as potential cause for further rejection; thus, they become intropunitive • Experience frequent and intense negative emotions – including depression, anxiety and anger (Klonsky & Muehlenkamp, 2007) • Have difficulty being aware of and expressing them (Gratz, 2006)

  6. MALADAPTIVE NATURE • Obvious negative physical consequences • Research indicates most prefer to stop this behavior • “I really would like to stop self-harming but feel I cant because I am addicted to it. I couldn’t live without the release.” (Harris, 2000, p. 169)

  7. PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CORRELATES: • Personality disorders (e.g. BPD, antisocial) • Elevated anxiety and depression • Emotional dysregulation and inexpressivity • Dissociation and posttraumatic stress • Disordered eating • Substance abuse • Reduced self-esteem • Self-critical cognitive style • History of childhood emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse (Aizenman & Jensen, 2007; Evren & Evren, 2005; Glassman et al., 2007; Hilt et al., 2008; Paivio & McCulloch, 2004; Ross & Health, 2002; Van der Whitlock et al., 2006; Yates et al., 2008; Zlotnick et al., 1999)

  8. EFFECTS • Does not usually cause death • Accidental slip can cause fatal results • Evident wounds/scars can create unsolicited reaction which aggravates feelings of rejection • Lead to permanent physical scars for life

  9. SIGNS & SYMPTOMS • Unexplained scars or marks • Fresh cuts, bruises, burns, or other signs of bodily damage • Bandages or wide accessories worn frequently, inappropriate dress for the season • Unwillingness to participate in events requiring less body coverage (e.g., swimming) • Razor blades or other cutting implements

  10. SIGNS & SYMPTOMS • Physical or emotional absence, social withdrawal, sensitivity to rejection • Difficulty handling anger • Compulsiveness • Expressions of self-depreciation, shame, and/or worthlessness (some highly functional and socially engaged individuals also self-injure) (Whitlock, Eckenrode, et al., 2006)

  11. TASKS OF SIGNIFICANT OTHERS • Be supportive, direct and honest about observation and concerns. • “I notice that you have wounds on your arms. I know that this can be a sign of self-injury. Are you deliberately hurting yourself?” • Walsh’s (2006) “respectful curiosity” – asking simple questions in calm, caring ways • “Where on your body do you tend to injure yourself?” • “Do you find yourself in certain moods when you injure yourself?” • “Are there certain things that make you want to injure yourself?”

  12. RESPONDING TO DENIAL • If the individual denies self-injuring or avoids the questions, respect for privacy must be applied with a warm invitation. “I respect your desire to keep this to yourself. But if you wish to talk about anything, I am here for you.” • If there is seeming danger to life, vigilance and professional assistance are a must. Experts can offer support, guidance and advice, and help identify and understand underlying causes of NSSI.

  13. OTHER TASKS • Help self-injurious students considered “cool” or role models to understand that when they talk about or show their self-injury to peers, risks of contagion occur. • Ensure NSSI that students cover wounds or scars when coming to school to prevent infection, undue attention, or contagion. • Extend full acceptance, unconditional love, care and respect to restore their self-esteem and self-love in very palpable and consistent ways • Help build on their strengths is an important step to recovery and non-recurrence.

  14. ASSESSMENT • Method(s) employed and types of tools (e.g. knife) • Location of injury on body (e.g., legs, arms) • Frequency of use in past year and past month • Tissue damage: typical amount; greater damage ever incurred (Walsh, 2007)

  15. ASSESSMENT • Lifetime history of NSSI (e.g., age of onset, remission) • Phenomenology/conditions surrounding use • “Tell me about the last time you cut yourself…” • Perceived function (e.g., tension reduction) • Sense of control while injuring • “Some feel out of control and cut more than expected…” (Walsh, 2007)

  16. ASSESSMENT • Use of drugs/alcohol during NSSI • History of medical attention and complications; need for medical referral (e.g., insertion of pins) • Current motivation for stopping behavior • Asking to see self-injuries (within bounds of modesty) for objective information

  17. TREATMENT ISSUES Therapeutic Relationship: • Open, nonjudgmental, understanding space • Examining own personal reactions to NSSI • Shock, anxiety, fear, disgust (Craigen & Foster, 2009; Walsh, 2007)

  18. TREATMENT ISSUES • Therapies with support: • Cognitive behavioral therapy • Dialectic behavioral therapy • Recommendations for combination between: • Modifying behaviors • Learning to accept unsettling emotions (Klonsky & Muehlenkamp, 2007; Nock, Teper & Hollander, 2007)

  19. BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES • Triggers/Antecedents to NSSI: • Cognitive (irrational thoughts) • Affective (emotions prior to NSSI) • Behavioral (habits, rituals prior to NSSI) • Help illuminate purpose behind NSSI (Walsh, 2007)

  20. BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES Replacement Skill Training: • Affect regulation • Journaling • Mindful breathing (tolerating negative affect) • Communicating skills • Assertiveness training • Create detailed behavioral plan (Walsh, 2006; Walsh, 2007; Wester & Trepal, 2005) (Walsh, 2007)

  21. COGNITIVE STRATEGIES • Research on cognitive variables: • Childhood abuse self-critical style NSSI • Social self-efficacy (Nock & Mendes, 2008) • Identifying maladaptive thought patterns • Reforming thoughts: more adaptive alternatives

  22. NEUROLINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING • Global Anchoring – rewriting history • Global Unconscious Reframing • Personal Power Radiator

  23. ETHICAL ISSUES • Right to privacy vs. protection from “serious and foreseeable harm” (ACA Code of Ethics, 2005) • 20% harmed self more severely than expected at least once (Whitlock et al., 2006) • 34% frequently fell out of control of NSSI (Briere & Gil, 1998) • If minor client, issues related to notifying parents

More Related