1 / 15

Fast ForWord Third Grade Implementation

Fast ForWord Third Grade Implementation. March 19, 2013. Implementation History. Initial pilot: Summer 2011 86 students in grades 1-8 Board approves purchase: January 2012 Implementation pilot: Spring 2012 4 elementary schools/both middle schools 2 basic implementation models

alyn
Télécharger la présentation

Fast ForWord Third Grade Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fast ForWordThird Grade Implementation March 19, 2013

  2. Implementation History Initial pilot: Summer 2011 86 students in grades 1-8 Board approves purchase: January 2012 Implementation pilot: Spring 2012 4 elementary schools/both middle schools 2 basic implementation models Implementation plan presented: June 2012 All-district third grade implementation: Sept.-Dec. 2012

  3. Third Grade Implementation Began toward end of September (after MAP testing) 30-minute, 5-day protocol Initial Reading Progress Indicator (RPI) assessment Worked to complete first two products: Language V2 Language to Reading Students unable to finish by winter recess continued through January

  4. Third Grade Overview

  5. Student Outcomes

  6. Outcome by Fall MAP Percentile Grouping

  7. Outcome by Fall DIBELS Instructional Recommendation

  8. Outcome by IEP Status

  9. Outcome by Lunch Status

  10. Outcome by Ethnicity

  11. Progress Compared to MAP

  12. Third Grade Conclusions Overall results were about typical for students completing one Fast ForWord product The first product was most successful among least proficient students, low income students and students with IEPs Starting with first product for all students may not be the most effective approach

  13. Second Grade Implementation Used auto-placement Students continuing to end of school year Committee will evaluate results at end of year to determine implementation for 2013-2014year

  14. Distribution of Second Grade Placement

  15. Questions?

More Related