1 / 9

“Potential physics data in the SeaDataNet CDI system – potential and challenges”

“Potential physics data in the SeaDataNet CDI system – potential and challenges” Peter Thijsse MARIS SeaDataNet2 - Plenary, Split – 24 September 2014. Challenge for physical data in operational centers, ROOS/MyOcean and CDI.

amato
Télécharger la présentation

“Potential physics data in the SeaDataNet CDI system – potential and challenges”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Potential physics data in the SeaDataNet CDI system – potential and challenges” Peter Thijsse MARIS SeaDataNet2 - Plenary, Split – 24 September 2014

  2. Challenge for physical data in operational centers, ROOS/MyOcean and CDI • ROOSes and MyOcean demonstrate the available stations in their indexes, but analysis of local networks indicate there is more: • Not all stations are shared to ROOSes (historically, or restrictions) • Not all parameters are shared • Historically active stations (logically) not present

  3. CDI system already holds large potential of physical data, but: • Stations can not be recognised due to missing/different station name. • Archived data center do not hold, or do not share the physical data yet. • Often recent data is missing (gap of many years) How did we analyse this?

  4. Query for potential physical data from fixed stations in CDI 1) search for:-- discovery parameters (P02) = RFVL, PPAB, EXCO, KRTS, LERR, LVLT, ASLV, WVSP, LRZA, GWDR, WVST, HEAV, CAPH, CDTA, CHUM, EWSB, WSTR-- measurement area type (L02) = 4   (=point)-- lat lon box: POLYGON((-29.23 27.2201, 43.4901 27.2201, 43.4901 75.35,-29.23 75.35, -29.23 27.2201)-- observation duration > 27 days   2) delete from results all CDI records with station_name = unspecified3) sort all remaining results by CDI_author => CDI_originator => station_name and then group count number of CDI records per station_name -- delete from the results all station_names with only 1 CDI record, that have a observation period < 360 days

  5. “Slim CDI physics interface” • Special interface on CDI subset only holding potential fixed station data • http://slim-emodnet-physics.maris2.nl/v_cdi_v3/browse_step.asp • Also stations no longer active (not in NRT data exhange)

  6. The current potential coverage map

  7. The current potential coverage • 864 stations • 11.377 CDI records • Coverage well in some countries, not in others

  8. Challenge of EMODNet Physics • Fix the gaps • Stimulate the exposure of physical data by data centers, necessary to streamline the process from operator to archive data center • Stimulate the operators, via the ROOS, to expand station coverage and parameter content • Harmonise the station names via code list to enable linking NRT and archived data of the same station

  9. Time for discussion!

More Related