1 / 6

P10

Supplement Fig. I. A. P2. P6. P10. Ctrl. 40. Hcy. 35. 30. #. Ctrl. *. *. 25. #. *. 20. S phase cells (%). 15. 10. Hcy. 5. 0. P2. P6. P10. B. P2. P6. P10. #. 80. *. Ctrl. 70. Hcy. Ctrl. 60. 50. *. 40. Apoptosis celsl (%). #. *. 30. Hcy. 20. 10. 0.

amela-frank
Télécharger la présentation

P10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supplement Fig. I A P2 P6 P10 Ctrl 40 Hcy 35 30 # Ctrl * * 25 # * 20 S phase cells (%) 15 10 Hcy 5 0 P2 P6 P10 B P2 P6 P10 # 80 * Ctrl 70 Hcy Ctrl 60 50 * 40 Apoptosis celsl (%) # * 30 Hcy 20 10 0 P2 P6 P10 Suppl. Fig. I.Cell cycle and apoptotic effects of Hcy treated HUVECs senescence.Primary cultured HUVECs (P2-P10) were treated with or without Hcy, 25 μM. (A) Cell cycle was detected by flow cytometry and the percentage of cells in the S phase was calculated; apoptosis was detected by TUNEL assay and the percentages of TUNEL-positive cells are expressed. Data was as means±SD (n=4). *P<0.05 vs Ctrl; #P<0.05, vs the Ctrl in their corresponding passages.

  2. Supplement Fig. II A 2.5 2.0 * 1.5 # eNOS mRNA expression # 1.0 ** 0.5 0.0 FA Hcy Ctrl LAR FA+Hcy LAR+Hcy B 8 ** 6 # # 4 iNOS mRNA expression 2 0 FA Hcy Ctrl LAR FA+Hcy LAR+Hcy Suppl. Fig. II. Effect of Hcy on eNOS and iNOS expression. (A) qRT-PCR of eNOS (B) and iNOS (C) mRNA expression in HUVECs (P4-P6) treated with Hcy, 50 μM, with or without pre-supplementation with FA (100 μM) or SAM (100 μM) for 1 hr. *P<0.05, **P<0.01vs. P2 control; #P<0.05 vs. Hcy. Data are mean±SD (n=4).

  3. 100 80 60 40 20 0 Supplement Fig. III B A 2.0 Ctrl 1.8 Hcy 1.5 1.5 (Fold of control) * λ * 1.2 λ T/S ratio * 1.0 mRNA relative level * 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 hTRET hTR TRF2 hTP1 P10 P2 P4 P6 P8 C D 50 2.5 * * * * * 2.0 40 ※ # # & * & 1.5 # 30 ※ ※ ※ * * * * 1.0 20 -gal positive rate (%) 0.5 hTERT mRNA expression 10 0.0 0 FA Ctrl Hcy FA LAR Ctrl Hcy SAM LAR SAM Ang II Ang II FA+Hcy FA+Hcy b LAR+Hcy 5-aza-CdR SAM+Hcy FA+Ang II LAR+Hcy LAR+Ang II 5-aza-CdR SAM+Hcy FA+Ang II SAM+Ang II LAR+Ang II SAM+Ang II FA+5-aza-CdR FA+5-aza-CdR LAR+5-aza-CdR SAM+5-aza-CdR LAR+5-aza-CdR SAM+5-aza-CdR E Ang II Ctrl Hcy 5-aza DM M U M U M U M U * Methylation ratio(%) * Suppl. Fig. III. Hcy stimulated EC senescence by restoring human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) activity via DNA hypomethylation. (A) qPCR analysis of relative telomerase length (T/S ratio in P2-P10 HUVECs treated with Hcy or not, 25 μM. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression of hTERT, hTR, TRF2 and hTP1 relative to PBS control with Hcy, 50 μM, for 72 hr in P4-P6 HUVECs. β-actin was an internal control. (C) Proportion of SA-β-gal–positive cells to PBS control and (D) qRT-PCR analysis of hTERT mRNA expression in HUVECs with Hcy (50 μM), angiotensin II (Ang II, 100 μM) or 5-aza (8 μM) with or without pre-supplementation with FA (100 μM), L-arginine (LAR, 50 μM) or SAM (100 μM). (E) MSP assay of hTERT methylation in HUVECs with Hcy, Ang II or 5-aza treatment. *P<0.05 vs. PBS control, # P<0.05 vs. Hcy, §P<0.05 vs. Ang II, ※P<0.05 vs. 5-aza. Data are mean±SD (n=4 for T/S ratio assay; n=5 for qPCR, MSP and SA-β-gal staining assay, as well as 2 parallel samples were measured each time).

  4. Supplement Fig. IV A Si-Ctrl Si-CTCF 1.50 1.25 CTCF 1.00 CTCF mRNA relative level 0.75 0.50 * 0.25 TBP 0.00 Si-Ctrl Si-CTCF B Si-Ctrl Si-SP1 1.50 1.25 SP1 1.00 SP1 mRNA relative level 0.75 ** 0.50 TBP 0.25 0.00 Si-Ctrl Si-SP1 C 1.50 Si-Ctrl Si-DNMT1 1.25 DNMT1 1.00 0.75 DNMT1 mRNA relative level ** 0.50 0.25 TBP 0.00 Si-Ctrl Si-DNMT1 Suppl. Fig. IV. Knockdown of SP1, CTCF and DNMT1 by si-RNA in HUVECs. qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis of expression of CTCF (A), SP1 (B) and DNMT1 (C), after P4 HUVECs were transfected with 40-nM siRNA for SP1, CTCF and DNMT1 or scramble siRNA control (si-Ctrl) for 12 hr. Data are mean±SD (n=4). TATA binding protein (TBP) was an internal control. *P<0.05 vs si-Ctrl transfection.

  5. Input Hcy Ctrl SP1 CTCF IP: SP1 IgG Hcy Ctrl CTCF IgG SP1 IP: CTCF IgG Hcy Ctrl SP1 IgG CTCF Supplement Fig. V A B C Supplement Fig. V Interaction analysis between SP1 and CTCF by co-immunoprecipitation in P4 HUVECs treated with or without Homocysteine (50 μmol/L) for 72 hr. The experiments were performed in 4 independent times.

  6. Supplement Fig. VI A 8 * 6 * 4 NOX4 mRNA expression 2 0 Ctrl HHcy Ctrl HHcy 8 W 4 W B NOX4 Ctrl DIPA NOX4 HHcy DIPA 4 W 8 W Suppl. Fig. VI. NOX4 expression in aortic intima of hyper-Hcy (HHcy) mice. C57 mice were fed standard chow with or without 2% methionine for 4 and 8 weeks (n=8, in each group). (A) qRT-PCR analysis of NOX4 mRNA level in aortic intima. Normalization was to mouse β-actin level. *P<0.05 vs Ctrl group. (B) Representative immunohistochemical staining of NOX4 (red) and nuclei (blue) in cross sections of aortas from HHcy and control mice.

More Related