1 / 22

How to Spend Billions: Designing and Implementing the Rural Development Regulation RDR in the EU and in Scotland

2. Triggers for this seminar. A new EU RDR and RDPs for 2007-2013: 91bn EU 70bn nat. 65bn priv. = 226bn total (450/hd)Current implementation of RDR/RDP in Scotland: 1.6bnEU: territorial cohesion?"; rural employment study 2006CAP Health Check"; 2009 EU budget review for 2013Scottish

amiel
Télécharger la présentation

How to Spend Billions: Designing and Implementing the Rural Development Regulation RDR in the EU and in Scotland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. How to Spend Billions: Designing and Implementing the Rural Development Regulation (RDR) in the EU and in Scotland' Ken Thomson University of Aberdeen Institute for Rural Research Seminar 3 December 2008

    2. 2 Triggers for this seminar A new EU RDR and RDPs for 2007-2013: 91bn EU + 70bn nat. + 65bn priv. = 226bn total (450/hd) Current implementation of RDR/RDP in Scotland: 1.6bn EU: territorial cohesion?; rural employment study 2006 CAP Health Check; 2009 EU budget review for 2013 Scottish reviews/reports, e.g. Shucksmith Committee on Crofting, OECD Rural Policy: Scotland, RSE Hills and Islands, SAC Retreat from the Hills, SG Rural Land Use Studies (forthcoming), Climate Change Bill, etc. EU FP7 research project: RuDI: Assessing the impact of Rural Development Policies (incl. Leader): www.rudi-europe.net

    3. 3 EU Rural Areas

    4. 4 EU Rural Development 1960s-1980s 1960s (EC-6): Agriculture Fund Guidance: for farm development (esp. capital investment) and farm restructuring 1970s (UK accession to EC-9): farm aids (annual payments plus extra grants) in Less Favoured Areas (despite common market) Structural (mainly new Regional) Fund(s): roads, etc. 1980s (budget crises, envtl. concerns, EU-12): voluntary agri-environmental schemes 1988: Structural Funds reformed and doubled

    5. 5 EU Rural Development 1990s WTO Uruguay Round MacSharry CAP reform: lower farm price support but direct payments to farmers plus accompanying measures for RD: agri-envt. schemes, early retirement, EU Commissioner and D-G for Agric. and RD LEADER: bottom-up RD (from structural funds) 1996 Cork conference on RD

    6. 6 EU Rural Development 2000s EU to enlarge into New Member States (NMSs) in Central Europe; WTO Doha Round to start CAP Pillar 1: farm market and income support still lower farm price support more (and more decoupled) direct payments plus voluntary modulation of funds to RD (but UK only!) CAP Pillar 2: rural development a Rural Devt. Reg. (RDR) with 9 measures for RD Programmes (RDPs), with complex funding Structural Funds: macro infrastructure, LEADER+ SAPARD: agric. & RD pre-accession aid for NMSs

    7. 7 EU Rural Development - 2003 Pillar 1 (subject to financial discipline): lower farm support prices (but still border tariffs) income support as Single Payments (SPs) subject to (weak, mainly agri-envtl.) cross-compliance compulsory modulation (5% of SFPs over 5K) to: Pillar 2: national/regional RDPs 2000-2006 NMSs: gradual Pillar 1 SPs 2004/07->13; more generous Pillar 2 and cohesion payments

    8. 8

    9. 9 EU Rural Development - now New fund (EAFRD) and new Reg. (1698/2005) Three/Four RD Priority Axes (min. exp. %s): Axis 1: competitive agric. & forestry (10%) Axis 2: environment and countryside (land management) (25%) Axis 3: rural quality of life & diversification (10%) Axis 4: mainstreaming of LEADER approach (5%) New national/regional RDPs subject to EU guidelines and National Strategy Plans

    10. 10

    11. 11

    12. 12 Scotland: at last!

    13. 13 The Scottish Rural Development Programme/Plan (SRDP) 2007-2013 designed late 2005 to mid-2007, approved spring 2008 1.6 billion over 2007-2013 (~75% Scottish funding) outcome-focused: competitiveness; water quality; climate change; biodiversity/landscapes; communities Broader: i.e. rural, not just agriculture 11 Regional Proposal Assessment Committees (RPACs) and LEADER Local Action Groups (LAGs) a one-stop shop (to SGRPID/SNH/FCS case officer) online applications only (for Rural Priorities)

    14. 14 Financing the SRDP

    15. 15 SRDP measures delivered through: (*semi-continued; s = awards Jun-Nov. 2008, total 147m) *Less Favoured Area Support Scheme (61m) *LEADER LAGs (38.5m) *Rural Development Contracts Rural Priorities (competitive; replaces Rural Stewardship Scheme) (28m to 350 applicants) *Food Processing etc. Grant Scheme (11m) *Rural Development Contracts Land Manager Options (4.5 million to 4,000) *Crofting Counties Agricultural Grant Scheme (3m) *Forestry Commission Challenge Funds (1.3m) Skills Development Scheme (new) (43K)

    16. 16 Rural Priorities: Application Process Statement of Intent (SoI) to Case Officer Feedback: amber or red Proposal and Outcome Plan (for Reg. Priorities) RPAC Assessment, via 14-criteria scoring by C.O. Contract Claims/Inspections Payments (first in Sept. 2009?), Penalties, Recoveries

    17. 17 SRDP Jargon About 50 webpages Rural Development Contracts - Rural Priorities integrated funding mechanism?! (up to) 9 forms to complete Grampian RPAC: 3 Axes, 9 Theme Priorities, 32 Priorities (e.g. with up to 6 Codes), plus Options?

    18. 18 Grampian RPAC Regional Priorities

    19. 19 RuDI WP2: Analysis of RDP Design Priorities/Objectives: in light of: existing strategies, EU Guidelines, National Plan needs, power bases, previous commitments, etc. Institutions: ministries, agencies, organisations, individuals: an Institutional map of links in design Processes: drafting, participation, consultation (public, intra-govt.; real or apparent; etc.), checks/approvals Scope: how far beyond agriculture (and food)? mostly Axes 3 (QoL/diversification) and 4 (LEADER)? Relationship to other funding and policies for/in rural areas, e.g. SFs, forestry, housing, transport? Implementation considerations? Monitoring and evaluation (CMEF)?, e.g. indicators

    20. 20 The Future? - Issues Should there be an EU/Scottish policy for rural development, and/or different/separate policies for: farming, competitiveness, regions, environment, social groups, energy, etc.? If an RDP, how does this fit with other EU and national policies (e.g. housing, communities)? objectives, design, implementation? If a CAP RDP, how to link with Pillar 1?

    21. 21 The Future? - EU The CAP Health Check: more modulation to bring ~1.2 bn/year (cf. 91bn) more to Pillar 2 for climate change, renewables, water management, biodiversity (but also for dairy!) Budget Review 2009 (for post-2013): fewer funds for CAP Pillar 1 and/or Pillar 2? shift (most of?) Pillar 2 to other Funds, e.g. Regional, Social, (new) Environment? Cohesion Fund for territorial policy (NMSs only)?

    22. 22 The Future? - Scotland Implementation of current RDP: a success? No more funding: few modulation changes A reformed LFA system for upland farming: active farming? High Nature Value areas? Final loss of transitional structural funding for Highlands & Islands New priorities, e.g. climate change, renewables

    23. Websites ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/index_en.htm www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Rural/SRDP www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Rural/SRDP/RuralPriorities/GrampianandMoray www.rudi-europe.net 23

More Related