1 / 9

INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION Session 6, 10/13/11 (Dan)

INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION Session 6, 10/13/11 (Dan). India’s Education Capacity Building Program & its evaluation DLS metaevaluation Chris Coryn’s comments re. the 2 metaevaluation reports, employment of JC Standards, uses of the metaevaluations , and next steps

amina
Télécharger la présentation

INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATION Session 6, 10/13/11 (Dan)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INVITATIONAL PRACTICUM IN METAEVALUATIONSession 6, 10/13/11 (Dan) India’s Education Capacity Building Program & its evaluation DLS metaevaluation Chris Coryn’scomments re. the 2 metaevaluation reports, employment of JC Standards, uses of the metaevaluations, and next steps DLS employed checklist and contents of his metaevaluation report Chris Coryn’sreflections on checklist-based metaevaluation and the more general approach by Owens DLS comment on applying checklists Student updates on finding a metaevaluation report Sample questions for next week’s test

  2. India’s Education Capacity-building Program(Chris) • Overview of the program • Roles of Corynand Cousins • Financing of the reform and their evaluations • Evaluation arrangements • Origin of the metaevaluation • Rationale for using the Joint Committee Standards? • Selection of 3 metaevaluators • Involvement of Cambridge Education Ltd. • Charge to the metaevaluators

  3. DLS Orientation to the Metaevaluation Assignment(Dan) • Each metaevaluator should proceed independently • Tailoring of a checklist to the assignment • Issue re. draft status of new JC Standards • Obtaining and reviewing materials • Prohibition against interviewing the evaluators • Production of 4 reports • Meeting with some of the Indian evaluators • Next steps: summative metaevaluations

  4. External Consultant’s Perspective on the Process(Chris) • Review of the Owens report • Resignation of the India-based metaevaluator • Contrast of the Owens and Stufflebeam reports • Fit of the JC Standards to the Indian context • Progress of the evaluation work in India • Impact of the India-based evaluations • Impact of the Owens and Stufflebeam reports • Next steps in the evaluations and metaevaluations

  5. Checklists(DLS) • Manual Checklist • Filled in using Microsoft Word • Automated Checklist • Microsoft Access • Excel

  6. Q & A re: AADHAR METAEVALUATION REPORT(Dan)

  7. REFLECTIONS(Chris) • Checklist-based metaevaluations • General, perceptual approach applied by Owens • Use of automated checklists

  8. STUDENT UPDATES(Dan) • Locating metaevaluation reports • Locating evaluation reports

  9. MID-TERM EXAMINATION(Chris) • Sample test questions • Modified true-false • Multiple choice • Work sample followed by multiple choice • Matching • About 60 items • Reference to distributed test plan

More Related