1 / 8

Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014

Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014. Briefing for Senior and Alumni Examiners. Our Objectives. Review steps of the two phases (Part 1 and Part 2) of the tech editing process, as revised in 2013. Share process improvements based on your input.

analu
Télécharger la présentation

Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014 Briefing for Senior and Alumni Examiners

  2. Our Objectives • Review steps of the two phases (Part 1 and Part 2) of the tech editing process, as revised in 2013. • Share process improvements based on your input. • Point you to resources for tech editing.

  3. 2014 Tech Editing Process: Part 1 • Before the consensus call, • tech editors will review the team’s draft work (focusing on 3 areas: comment conflicts, comment/scoring alignment, andtone based on the applicant’s view); • tech editors will give direct feedback to the team leader; and • team leaders will share the feedback with the team, as appropriate.

  4. 2014 Tech Editing Process: Part 2 • After the scorebook is finalized in BOSS, • tech editors will help Baldrige staff review the quality of scorebooks (completing five comprehensive editing tasks); • team leaders may be contacted again by tech editors with questions (e.g., to clarify comments); and • team leaders may share additional feedback with the team, as appropriate.

  5. Additional Improvements Based on Your Input (Thank you!) • Send applications to tech editors several weeks before R-3 review. • Give tech editors access to BOSS. • Allow some flexibility in tech editor/team leader communications (e.g., feedback can be posted in BOSS if agreed upon). • Be sure team leaders are aware of two-part tech editing process. • Try to keep the same tech editor with team for both phases. • Focus on fewer tasks in part 1 tech editing (2014: comment conflicts, comment/scoring alignment, tone from applicant view).

  6. Where Can You Find Tech Edit Resources?

  7. Benefits of the Two-Part Process • Applicant: Best-quality feedback • Team Leader: Feedback to improve and feedback to celebrate team’s work • Tech Editor: Time saved by noting concerns earlier in the process

  8. Call to Action • Alumni: Please let us know if you are interested in serving as a tech editor this year. (Sign up today or e-mail us before June.) • Seniors: Please consider the tech editor’s role in your team’s planning to maximize this support (e.g., be sure to communicate scheduling that may impact the tech editor’s R-3 review, share feedback with team members to help them improve comments). Thank you!

More Related