1 / 27

Dynamic Speed and Sensor Rate Adjustment for Mobile Robotic Systems

Dynamic Speed and Sensor Rate Adjustment for Mobile Robotic Systems. Ala’ Qadi , Steve Goddard University of Nebraska-Lincoln Computer Science and Engineering Department Jiangyang Huang, Shane Farritor University of Nebraska-Lincoln Mechanical Engineering Department.

angelica-jimenez
Télécharger la présentation

Dynamic Speed and Sensor Rate Adjustment for Mobile Robotic Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dynamic Speed and Sensor Rate Adjustment for Mobile Robotic Systems Ala’ Qadi, Steve Goddard University of Nebraska-Lincoln Computer Science and Engineering Department Jiangyang Huang, Shane Farritor University of Nebraska-Lincoln Mechanical Engineering Department

  2. Introduction: Mobile Robotic Systems • As real-time systems, computations must be completed within established response times. • As spatial systems, the computation performed and their timeliness will be dependent on: • The location of the platform in its environment. • The velocity with which the platform is moving. • The existence of objects in the environment.

  3. Challenges • Task execution requirements change as the platform moves in the environment. • Platform velocity is dependent on the rate system can collect and process data. • Dynamic changes in the environment (obstacle) might lead to overload conditions.

  4. Contributions • An abstract analysis methodology for mobile real-time systems that integrates spatio-temporal properties: • processing windows. • zone abstractions. • Dynamic adjustment algorithm: • maintains a maximum speed less than or equal to the desired speed. • maintains schedulabilty by adjusting • processing window. • platform speed.

  5. Processing windows • Processing Window: The time interval from the instant the platform starts collecting data to the moment the platform must finish processing the data. • A processing window is the deadline for execution of one or more interdependent tasks.

  6. Zones: No Motion We define a zone as the area for which the platform collects and processes sensor information, creates a map for the area and plans its path through the area. 2-Dimensional Zone Example

  7. Zones: Mobile System In Motion In motion, safety area included

  8. Zones: Definitions • Planning Point Fi =(tiF ,LiF) • Data Collection Point Bi=(tiB ,LiB) Two-Dimensional Zones • LiF =(xiF,yiF,yiF) • LiB =(xiB,yiB,yiB) • Fi =(tiF,xiF,yiF,yiF) • Bi=(tiB,xiB,yiB,yiB)

  9. Zones: Zone Processing Windows Maximal Scanning Minimal Scanning

  10. Dynamic Processing Windows • Changes in the platform environment. • Increasing the maximum possible platform speed. • Increasing performance for processing window related task.

  11. Sensor Impact on Processing Window Length • The zone processing window of the platform is dependent on sensor parameters: • number of sensor n. • set of delays between sensor readings/invocations D. • set of sensor range and sensitivity R. • set of sensor tasks execution times E. • feasibility function g is dependent on the sensors and the associated tasks and parameters. • DI, Independent delays, DR, Sensor range dependent delays

  12. Schedulabilty Impact on Processing Window Length • Any mobile real-time platform will have a set of tasks • is set of tasks associated with the zone processing window w. • is a (possibly empty) set of periodic tasks with higher priority than . • is a (possibly empty) set of periodic tasks with lower priority than .

  13. Schedulabilty Impact: Fixed Priority Scheduling

  14. Combining the sensor bound with the schedulabilty bound. • If , to find the lower bound on w, Solve • The same procedure can be extended if .

  15. Motion Impact on Processing Window Length • The maximum speed at which the platform can travel is related to the rate the environment can be scanned and signals processed. • The speed of the platform for a zone is dependent on • The radius of the zone. • The zone-processing window. • The speed of the platform in the previous zone. • The existence of obstacles in the zone.

  16. Motion Impact on Processing Window Length First Zone Z0 Beyond Z0 Motion Bound

  17. Example: 2-dimisional Constant Speed If at any plan point Fi we change the zone processing window wior change the sensor detection range ri.

  18. Motion Impact on Processing Window Length: Obstacles Exist • The distance the platform can safely move is not the zone radius. • Move safe distance between the obstacle and the platform, Xobs. • If Xobs < Di

  19. Processing Window Adjustment Algorithm

  20. Processing Window Speed/Adjustment Algorithm

  21. Companion is a robot with 24 sonar sensors, 15o apart. Case Study1: Robot Navigation Using Sonar Sensors

  22. Task Processing Graph

  23. Motion Bounds • No Obstacles • Obstacles Exist

  24. Simulation Without Processing Window/Speed Adjustment With Processing Window/Speed Adjustment

  25. Actual Test With Processing Window/Speed Adjustment Without Processing Window/Speed Adjustment

  26. Results Summary Simulation Result Summary Actual Test Summary

  27. Conclusion • We presented a method for integrating • speed requirements of a mobile robotic platform with • real-time fixed priority scheduling. • New abstractions called zones and processing windows were created. • An algorithm for the adjusting zone processing window was developed. • Improved system performance (Speed).

More Related