1 / 12

Review of TMH1

Review of TMH1. Tests on asphalt. Role of Sabita. Motivation Standards. Motivation. Industry expects realistic standards of: material quality and assessment thereof in a quality management process (during process and acceptance control)

anila
Télécharger la présentation

Review of TMH1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review of TMH1 Tests on asphalt

  2. Role of Sabita • Motivation • Standards

  3. Motivation • Industry expects realistic standards of: • material quality and • assessment thereof in a quality management process (during process and acceptance control) • Costs associated with inconsistent/incorrect testing - significant and wasteful • Make a contribution to any effort that would advance consistency in production of test results used as a basis for judgement of compliance

  4. International standards • Sabita (& SABS) subscribes to WTO policy and obligations on government procurement: “…technical specifications shall be based on international standards, where they exist…” • Any deviations should be for compelling reasons • ASTM applied to assessment of bitumen quality (SANS 307) • Currency of standards • International standards are regularly reviewed and readily available • TMH 1 last reviewed in 1986 (21years ago)

  5. Process framework • Sabita agreed to fund investigation into revision of TMH tests on asphalt • Part of a more comprehensive process (interested parties, expert groups – MTC – SABS • Convening of Sabita task team of experts • Elicit comments on SANS 3001 AS… • Collate comments • Submit to MTC (correct channels)

  6. Sabita task team • Composition • Brief • Investigation matrix • Process

  7. Task team composition Henry Appollis (Much Asphalt) Wim Hofsink (PDNA) Tony Lewis (Iliso) Hennie Loots (SRT) Pieter Molenaar (SSI) Gert Mynhardt (Akasia) Wynand Nortje (National Asphalt) Francois Ruiters (More Asphalt) Gary Swart (BCP) Andre Ungerer (Goba)

  8. Brief • ASTM International selected as a benchmark standard • Test methods (SANS 3001) to be subjected to comparative appraisal • Comments and suggestions on the adoption of international standards • Shape - a critical comparison of the methods proposed in SANS with ASTM standards

  9. Investigation matrix

  10. Summary of comments • Brevity and incompleteness of AS methods • ASTM Int. by far more comprehensive - constitutes a standard (rigorous description of apparatus, method and precision to ensure uniformity) • No objections to the adoption of the relevant (ASTM) international standard

  11. Meeting on 6 Nov Outcome & recommendations Meeting of task group, Barry Dumas Trevor Distin and Dave Wright • Adopt international standard (ASTM, EN) Where options exist • Select appropriate one(s) • Issue a recommendation • Incorporate in national standards (or SABS) • Sabita to develop (user friendly) bench methods (training manuals) to ensure compliance with the standard adopted

  12. Recommendations/cont… • Introduce through SABS only if it admits the adoption of options (e.g. Marshall hammer type described in 1.2 of ASTM D 6926 or extraction method(s) A – E in ASTM D2172) • Retrain laboratory technicians/testers on standard adopted and manuals (bench methods) by AsAc • Submit the above to RPF • If acceptable, task team to proceed to investigate suitable standard and implementation thereof on lab floor for submission to next RPF • Approach MTC through established channels

More Related