1 / 12

Subtransmission Reliability Criteria

Subtransmission Reliability Criteria. Informational Workshop Investigation into Least-Cost Integrated Resource Planning for the Vermont Electric Power Company Steve Litkovitz Department of Public Service September 19, 2005.

anneke
Télécharger la présentation

Subtransmission Reliability Criteria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Subtransmission Reliability Criteria Informational Workshop Investigation into Least-Cost Integrated Resource Planning for the Vermont Electric Power Company Steve Litkovitz Department of Public Service September 19, 2005

  2. What is the Vermont subtransmission system? • Vermont’s medium voltage transmission lines and devices, most commonly at 34.5 kV, 46 kV, and 69 kV, primarily supplied by VELCO high voltage substations. • Most subtransmission systems are owned and operated by CVPS, GMP, and VEC. • Primary function is to provide reliable supply to Vermont’s 225 distribution substations.

  3. Why consider subtransmission reliability in a VELCO context? • The subtransmission systems are supplied by VELCO substations. • VELCO planning occurs in step with its subtransmission “customers.” • Subtransmission system reliability needs can, at times, be met by VELCO upgrades. • Docket No. 6839, Tafts Corner substation • Future: Tafts Corner substation expansion? • Future: Southern Loop upgrades?

  4. What is the reliability criteria applied to Vermont subtransmission? • No Board Order, Board Rule, or state-wide utility standard that establishes a single subtransmission system reliability criteria. • However, examination of existing utility practices, recent upgrades, and Board Orders reveal a “tempered N-1” standard for subtransmission reliability.

  5. Tempered N-1 Standard • Under normal situations, lines are not overloaded, voltages hold steady, and loads are served. (This criteria is met virtually all of the time.) • After a first contingency (N-1), the remaining lines are not overloaded above their emergency ratings, voltages are adequate, and substation loads are served following required switching. (This criteria is met most of the time.)

  6. Why not meet N-1 all of the time? • The N-1 criteria appears to be tempered by the following: • Radial lines • Cost considerations • Load levels • Environmental considerations

  7. - Radial Lines • Ideally, substations are supplied by at least two subtransmission feeds in a looped configuration. If one feed is lost to contingency, supply to the substation can be maintained by the alternate feed. • However, approximately 30% of Vermont substations are supplied by only one subtransmission line, i.e., supplied radially.

  8. - Cost Considerations • Providing looped subtransmission service to substations may not be the most cost-effective use of limited capital dollars. • Example: • WEC Maple Corner substation in Calais has a radial subtransmission supply and serves 800 customers. • Looping would require at least 12 miles of new 34.5 kV subtransmission costing approximately $2 million. • This results in a cost of $2,500/customer to cover just the subtransmission contingency.

  9. - Load Levels • Situations exist in which N-1 coverage is provided most of the time, but is not provided at the highest load levels. • Example: • Docket No. 6794, CVPS St. Albans area upgrades: N-1 coverage is significantly enhanced through relatively modest investments in the 34.5 kV subtransmission system. • Total N-1 coverage, available with a 115 kV option, was rejected as “being unlikely to be cost-effective in terms of its incremental cost and benefits.” (Order at page 4.)

  10. - Environmental Considerations • Transmission projects can have environmental impacts. • The Board stated that 30 V.S.A. Sec. 248 is a “strong statement that the natural environment … [is] of great importance and that [it] should be impaired only if absolutely necessary.” (Docket No. 4782, Order at page 41.) • In Docket No. 6860, a proposed loop feed to Vergennes was rejected and replaced by a subtransmission radial feed to address aesthetic concerns.

  11. N-1 Is Met Most of the Time • Despite the impediments described above, Vermont’s subtransmission systems have evolved to the point that an N-1 supply criteria to most substations is met most of the time. • Example: • Docket No. 6823, rebuilding GMP’s 34.5 kV line in South Burlington to provide first contingency coverage at all load levels

  12. Summary • VELCO planning is conducted in concert with the requirements of the underlying subtransmission systems. • Examination reveals a “tempered N-1” subtransmission reliability criteria. • Despite impediments resulting from configuration, cost, load, and environmental considerations, an N-1 supply criteria is met for most substations most of the time.

More Related