html5-img
1 / 54

LEVERAGING INDEPENDENT DIVERSITY PROGRAMS INTO A SYNERGISTIC ACTION INITATIVE (STEM) An “R1” Perspective

LEVERAGING INDEPENDENT DIVERSITY PROGRAMS INTO A SYNERGISTIC ACTION INITATIVE (STEM) An “R1” Perspective. Mark Hernandez and Barbara Kraus et al. University of Colorado at Boulder Office of the Colorado Diversity Initiative. We are a well funded faculty driven cooperative

annora
Télécharger la présentation

LEVERAGING INDEPENDENT DIVERSITY PROGRAMS INTO A SYNERGISTIC ACTION INITATIVE (STEM) An “R1” Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LEVERAGING INDEPENDENT DIVERSITY PROGRAMS INTO A SYNERGISTIC ACTION INITATIVE (STEM) An “R1” Perspective Mark Hernandez and Barbara Kraus et al. University of Colorado at Boulder Office of the Colorado Diversity Initiative

  2. We are a well funded faculty driven cooperative providing mentoring and $ support for STEM students in a growing multi cultural scientific community…. “Our” Mission: Help STEM Departments Broaden Participation in Graduate School  Professoriate STEM Summer Internship Class 2005

  3. What CU Campus Diversity Efforts Were: Circa 1999, the “well intended alphabet soup” f F 3 McNair D Ed f NIH Training (3) NSF REU (19) f College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC f DOD training F 4 NSF IU/CRC f NSF IGERT (3) REGENT HALL NSF AGEP “Clusters of Mentoring Successes” SMART

  4. What are Campus Diversity Efforts Were:“Random Cross-Talk  Parity” f F 3 McNair D Ed f NIH Training (3) NSF REU (19) f College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC f DOD training F 4 NSF IU/CRC f NSF IGERT (3) REGENT HALL NSF AGEP SMART

  5. What are Campus Diversity Efforts Were: Random Cross-Talk f F 3 McNair D Ed f NIH Training (3) NSF REU (19) f College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC f DOD training F 4 NSF IU/CRC f NSF IGERT (3) REGENT HALL NSF AGEP SMART

  6. What are Campus Diversity Efforts Were:Random Cross-Talk f F 3 McNair D Ed f NIH Training (3) NSF REU (19) f College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC f DOD training F 4 NSF IU/CRC f NSF IGERT (3) REGENT HALL NSF AGEP SMART

  7. What are Campus Diversity Efforts Were:Random Cross-Talk f F 3 McNair D Ed f NIH Training (3) NSF REU (19) f College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC f DOD training F 4 NSF IU/CRC f NSF IGERT (3) REGENT HALL NSF AGEP SMART

  8. Campus Diversity Efforts Were Not Synchronized:victims of capricious communications and isolation f F 3 McNair D Ed f NIH Training (3) NSF REU (19) f College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC f DOD training F 4 NSF IU/CRC f NSF IGERT (3) REGENT HALL NSF AGEP SMART

  9. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiatives Q. Why “Consolidate” Operations? A. Leverage !

  10. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiatives Q. Why Consolidate Operations? A. Leverage ! All programs are diversity driven; all have similar educational missions, and many have nearly the same reporting requirements:

  11. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiative • Q. Why Consolidate Operations? A. Leverage ! • All programs are diversity driven; all have similar educational missions, and many have nearly the same reporting requirements: • Identify Skilled Labor for Campus-wide Oversight (e.g. MBA)

  12. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiative • Q. Why Consolidate Operations? A. Leverage ! • All programs are diversity driven; all have similar educational missions, and many have nearly the same reporting requirements: • Identify Skilled Labor for Campus-wide Oversight (e.g. MBA) • Streamline and Formally Coordinate Communications / Operations

  13. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiative • Q. Why Consolidate Operations? A. Leverage ! • All programs are diversity driven; all have similar educational missions, and many have nearly the same reporting requirements: • Identify Skilled Labor for Campus-wide Oversight (e.g. MBA) • Streamline and Formally Coordinate Communications / Operations • Consolidate and “Decompress” Recruiting Efforts

  14. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiative • Q. Why Consolidate Operations? A. Leverage ! • All programs are diversity driven; all have similar educational missions, and many have nearly the same reporting requirements: • Identify Skilled Labor for Campus-wide Oversight (e.g. MBA) • Streamline and Formally Coordinate Communications / Operations • Consolidate and “Decompress” Recruiting Efforts • Centralize Diversity Statistics for Reporting and Planning

  15. Proposed Consolidation and ReorganizationColorado Diversity Initiative • Q. Why Consolidate Operations? A. Leverage ! • All programs are diversity driven; all have similar educational missions, and many have nearly the same reporting requirements: • Identify Skilled Labor for Campus-wide Oversight (e.g. MBA) • Streamline and Formally Coordinate Communications / Operations • Consolidate and “Decompress” Recruiting Efforts • Centralize Diversity Statistics for Reporting and Planning • Save Operations Costs (Regent Hall loved this idea)

  16. What We Did (1999): Pursue Large Agency Grants - the vision-to Organize, Synchronize, Communicate, and Leverage f f F 3 REGENT HALL NSF AGEP NIH IMSD F 2 SMART f f NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC f NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) McNair D Ed NSF ERC NIH Training (3) f f F 4

  17. How Did We Stage to Achieve “the vision”?Self-Selecting Faculty + Willing Deanery  (interim) $taff + $eed f f F 3 REGENT HALL NSF AGEP NIH IMSD F 2 SMART f f NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC f NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) McNair D Ed NSF ERC NIH Training (3) f f F 4

  18. How Did We Get Funding for Sustaining this organization?“Everyone has some “skin” in the game……(a soft tax)” $$$ f f F 3 REGENT HALL NSF AGEP NIH IMSD $ F 2 $ SMART f f NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC f McNair D Ed NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC NIH Training (3) $ $ f $ $ f F 4 $

  19. How Did We Get Cooperation for Sustaining this Organization?Assured All Contributing Parties  Faculty Run ! ( no Regents, Deans, VIPs) f f F 3 Office of the Colorado Diversity Initiative NSF AGEP NIH IMSD REGENT HALL F 2 f f NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC f McNair D Ed NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC NIH Training (3) f f F 4

  20. How Do We Govern and Establish our Mission of Parity? f f F 3 Office of the Colorado Diversity Initiative NSF AGEP NIH IMSD REGENT HALL F 2 f f McNair D Ed NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC f NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC NIH Training (3) f f F 4

  21. How Do We Govern and Establish our Mission of Parity?Faculty Steering Committee f f f f f f f f f + f f Office of the Colorado Diversity Initiative NSF AGEP NIH IMSD REGENT HALL NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC McNair D Ed NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC NIH Training (3)

  22. Let’s take a closer look….. COLORADO DIVERSITY INITIATIVE NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC McNair D Ed NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC NIH Training (3)

  23. The Well Intended Alphabet Soupof Campus Diversity Programs: circa 1990’s NSF ERC F 3 NIH Training McNair D Ed f NSF REU f College Minority Progs f NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT Central ADMIN F 4

  24. Colorado Diversity Initiative Manifests as a “Hub and Spoke” System: $, , ,  NSF ERC F 3 NIH Training McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Prog. CO Diversity Initiative AGEP NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT Central ADMIN F 4

  25. Since 2000 Successful Operation of CDI Has Leveraged Credibility and Talent to Secure: NSF ERC F 3 McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Progs CO Diversity Initiative AGEP NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT Central ADMIN F 4

  26. University of Colorado at Boulder: Has Leveraged CDI to Secure NSF ERC F 3 McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Progs CO Diversity Initiative DOE training AGEP NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT Central ADMIN F 4

  27. University of Colorado at Boulder: Has Leveraged CDI to Secure NSF ERC F 3 NIH Training McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Progs CO Diversity Initiative DOE training AGEP NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT Central ADMIN F 4

  28. University of Colorado at Boulder: Has Leveraged CDI  to Secure NSF ERC F 3 NIH Training McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Progs CO Diversity Initiative DOE training AGEP NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT SLOAN Central ADMIN $ F 4

  29. University of Colorado at Boulder: Has Leveraged CDI  to Secure NSF ERC F 3 NIH Training McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Progs CO Diversity Initiative DOE training AGEP Leadership Alliance NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT SLOAN Central ADMIN $ F 4

  30. University of Colorado at Boulder: Has Leveraged CDI  to Secure NSF ERC F 3 NIH Training McNair f NSF REU f f College Minority Progs CO Diversity Initiative DOE training AGEP  Leadership Alliance NSF IU/CRC f f NSF IGERT SLOAN Central ADMIN $ F 4

  31. We know its all about faculty buy in and mentoring efforts….. SO: Why Should Rank & File Faculty Care about Diversity and the CDI ? Excerpts from the “road show” Educate faculty (and administrators) regarding contemporary diversity issues, and promote grass-roots involvement

  32. Science, Math & Engineering PhDs Awarded Nationally

  33. Science, Math & Engineering PhDs Awarded Nationally c.a. 700 + If this does not appall and motivate you for parity…..try this

  34. Meeting the Ever Changing Grant Writing Challenges: R1s FACTS: Population  Funding $  Politics ?↔? Large Agencies and Foundations are Increasing their Stringency with Respect to University Awards:

  35. Meeting the Ever Changing Grant Writing Challenges: R1s FACTS: Population  Funding $  Politics ?↔? Large Agencies and Foundations are Increasing their Stringency with Respect to University Awards: Awards  Competition 

  36. Meeting the Ever Changing Grant Writing Challenges: R1s FACTS: Population  Funding $  Politics ? Change Large Agencies and Foundations are Increasing their Stringency with Respect to University Awards: Diversity is presented as a Mandate! NSF, EPA, NIH etc. no progress toward parity = no centers, no grants …………….………………………………….…(and no dice)

  37. Why Should Rank & File Faculty Care ? If you agree to “take care” = competent mentor • Provide RA support for underrepresented PhD candidates – includes conference travel / relocation • Provide summer support for underep undergraduates interested in graduate school: SMART + REU (AY) • Provide grant writing support for large agency proposals (i.e. underrep. enrollmentsstatistics modules and text)

  38. Department Campaigning Experience:Getting the Attention of the Faculty at Largethree pool theory Diversity/Parity Actively Promote Too Busy / Don’t Know “Depends Who is Watching” Actively Oppose “Swing Voters”

  39. Department Campaigning Experience:Getting the Attention of the Faculty at Largethree pool theory Diversity/Parity Actively Promote Too Busy / Don’t Know “Depends Who is Watching” Actively Oppose “Swing Voters” With CDI internal marketing and a little help from $$$

  40. Department Campaigning Experience:Getting the Attention of the Faculty at Largethree pool theory Diversity/Parity Actively Promote Too Busy / Don’t Know “Swing Voters” “Depends Who is Watching” Actively Oppose With CDI internal marketing and a little help from $$$

  41. Colorado Diversity Initiative is now a big ticket hard line item Governed: 10 member STEM Faculty Steering Committee ( ~ $ 1.5 M / yr ) FACULTY SERVICE STUDENT SERVICE • - Find Pools of Qualified • Underrepresented Students • - Provide Institutional Data • & Grant Writing Support • Ethnographic Assessment of • progress toward parity - “Hand Pick” Mentors - Host Community - Professional Development & Building Career Networks + conference travel + technical workshops + professional institutes

  42. Colorado Diversity Initiative Action…….We help faculty: recruit, develop, track and place CU STEM Track Align $eed Place Recruit National Network NSF NGOs MSI Post-Doc Faculty CDI Communications HUB Operations Database

  43. Colorado Diversity InitiativeCurrent Trajectory STEM Graduate Schools 6.0 % 3.7 % PhD Retention rate is the same as majority counter parts: c.a. ~ 2/3

  44. CU minority PhD enrollments: where do they go?Sciences, Math, Engineering and Technology Steady State Annual Average: 6-7 PhDs graduate from groups traditionally underrepresented in Sciences, Technology, Math and Engineering 16 tenure track faculty

  45. Real Institutionalization = ?faculty incentives and resources • By virture of our #’s we have new found Political Leverage! Diversity is the “best news in town” • Formal Integration of diversity mentoring credit into P & T (Thank you Vandy and UMass) • Cabinet level Vice Chancellor position LEADING diversity (former faculty focusing on faculty + students)

  46. Provost Chancellor Graduate Dean NSF Steering Committee NIH Steering Committee COMMUNITY! Is the most important retention factor: Min = Maj

  47. The Synergy has been Tremendous…… f f f f f f f f f f + Office of the Colorado Diversity Initiative NSF AGEP NIH IMSD REGENT HALL NSF IGERT (3) NSF IU/CRC McNair D Ed NSF REU (19) DOD training College Minority Prog (2) NSF ERC NIH Training (3) SLOAN FOUNDATION CARNEGIE FOUNDATION SOUTHERNREGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE

  48. Please stop ?

  49. ….and while the climate for diversity is not ideal….

More Related