1 / 16

Partonic Collectivity at RHIC

Partonic Collectivity at RHIC. ShuSu Shi for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Central China Normal University. Outline. Introduction STAR Detectors v 2 Results and Discussions System size and Energy Dependence Multi-strange Hadron  and Ω

aram
Télécharger la présentation

Partonic Collectivity at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Partonic Collectivity at RHIC ShuSu Shi for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Central China Normal University

  2. Outline • Introduction • STAR Detectors • v2 Results and Discussions • System size and Energy Dependence • Multi-strange Hadron andΩ • Summary

  3. Introduction V(r,T) • The potential between quarks is a function of distance. It also depends on the temperature. • At low temperature, the potential increases linearly with the distance between quarks •  quarks are confined • At high temperature (RHIC), the confinement potential is ‘melted’ •  quarks are deconfined T < T conf linear potential constant potential T > T conf r

  4. Elliptic Flow (v2) hadronic partonic Coordinate-Space Anisotropy Momentum-Space Anisotropy interactions • Strange hadron: less sensitive to late hadronic rescattering • Elliptic flow => • Early stage collision dynamics • Good probe of the early stage of the collision , Ω, Ξ, Λ D , K, p

  5. STAR Detectors TPC dE/dx PID: pion/kaon: pT ~ 0.6 GeV/c; proton pT ~ 1.0 GeV/c

  6. Particle Identification • Reconstructed by decay topology • Daughter hadrons are identified by dE/dx in TPC • Signal to background ratio ~ 1 – 20 (depends on colliding system, particle type and pT) STAR: preliminary

  7. Participant Plane • RP: the reaction plane • Defined by the impact parameter • Initial geometry: εstd • PP: the participant plane • Defined by the major axis of the created system • Initial geometry: εpart PHOBOS : NPA774: 523 (2006), PRC77, 014906 (2008) S. A. Voloshin, A. M. Poskanzer, A.Tang and G.Wang, PLB, 659 (2008), 537-541 • v2 from the event plane method is sensitive to the participant plane

  8. Ideal Hydro Test Ideal hydro: P. Huovinen, private communication • Ideal hydro fails to reproduce centrality dependence of the data. • Fluctuation of v2? Viscosity? Incomplete thermalization?

  9. System and Energy Dependence • Au+Au and Cu+Cu • Minimum bias events • 200 and 62.4 GeV • Event plane • Au+Au: TPC • Systematic: FTPC, 5% • Cu+Cu: FTPC • Systematic: v2{AA-pp}, 5% • NQ scaling • De-confinement at RHIC • Partonic collectivity • Scaled by eccentricity • Remove the initial geometry • Stronger collective flow in larger system STAR: preliminary STAR Au + Au 62.4 GeV : PRC75, 054906 (2007) εpart{2}: J. Y. Ollitrault, A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, PRC80, 014904 (2009)

  10. Centrality Dependence STAR Au + Au 200 GeV : PRC77, 054901 (2008) STAR: preliminary S. Voloshin, A. Poskanzer, PL B474, 27(00). D. Teaney, et. al., nucl-th/0110037 • Au+Au and Cu+Cu at 200 GeV • NQ scaling for each centrality bin => partonic collectivity • Collectivity: Driven by number of participants, NOT by eccentricity. • Larger v2/part indicates stronger flow in more central collisions. • Hint: the system created in collisions at RHIC is not fully thermalized.

  11. Partonic Collectivity PHENIX πand p: nucl-ex/0604011v1 • Low pT (≤ 2 GeV/c): hydrodynamic mass ordering • High pT (> 2 GeV/c): number of quarks ordering • s-quark hadron: smaller interaction strength in hadronic medium • light- and s-quark hadrons: similar v2 pattern • => Collectivity developed at partonic stage!

  12. Summary • The v2 of the multi-strange hadrons ϕ, Ω  Partonic collectivity at RHIC! • The observed NQ scaling  De-confinement at RHIC! Test thermalization at RHIC Heavy flavor measurements  Thermalization at RHIC?

  13. Backup

  14. v2 versus Minv method KS0 Assume Borghini et al. Phys. Rev. C70 (2006)4905

  15. Centrality Dependence STAR: preliminary STAR Au + Au 200 GeV : PRC77, 054901 (2008)

  16. Ideal Hydro Test Ideal hydro: P. Huovinen, private communication Au+Au at 200 GeV STAR Au + Au 200 GeV : PRC77, 054901 (2008) • Ideal hydro fails to reproduce centrality dependence of the data. • Fluctuation of v2? Viscosity? Incomplete thermalization?

More Related