1 / 24

Syntax 3

Syntax 3. Ling400. Long-distance relations. WH “movement” A wh -expression (what, who, etc.) is often found in the “wrong place” and is related to another position within the same sentence. Our theory explains this fact in terms of a “movement transformation.”. WH movement. S. NP Mary.

aran
Télécharger la présentation

Syntax 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Syntax 3 Ling400

  2. Long-distance relations • WH “movement” • A wh-expression (what, who, etc.) is often found in the “wrong place” and is related to another position within the same sentence. • Our theory explains this fact in terms of a “movement transformation.”

  3. WH movement S NP Mary VP Aux has NP what Vt eaten

  4. WH movement S What Aux has NP Mary Aux [has] VP NP [what] Vt eaten

  5. Subj.-Aux. inversion John can eat fish. John can eat what? *John can eat fish what ? *John will disappear what? John will disappear. • auxiliary verbs are generated between the subject NP and the main verb. • subj and aux then switch positions in wh-questions.

  6. Wh-movement+Subj-Aux inversion S WH What Aux has VP NP Mary Aux [has] NP [what] V eaten

  7. Subj-Aux inversion in yes-no questions John can come to the party. Can John come to the party? Bill will get married next month. Will Bill get married next month? John studies mathematics. *Studies John mathematics? Does John study mathematics? [Don’t worry about this one.]

  8. Embedded questions • What happens in embedded questions? John knows what Bill can eat. *John knows whatcan Bill eat. *John knows Bill can eat what. • Wh-movement occurs • Subj.-Aux. Inversion does not occur.

  9. WH questions in other languages • Not all languages move wh-words in wh-questions. • Examples: Chinese, Japanese, and many others.

  10. WH questions in Chinese • Ni shenme shihou qu yinyue hui? • you what time go to music meeting • ‘When will you go to the concert?’ • Ni cong nali lai? • you from where come • ‘Where do you come from?’

  11. WH questions in Chinese • Tamen zuotian wanshang chi shenme le? • they yesterday night eat what asp-mk • ‘What did they eat last night? • Women zenme zuo jiaozi? • we how make dumpling • ‘How do we make dumplings?’

  12. WH questions in Chinese • Ta wei shenme ku le? • she for what cry asp-mk • ‘Why did she cry?’ • Ni shi shei? • you are who • ‘Who are you?’

  13. The Organization of Grammar • Lexicon (finite) • Phrase structure rules (finite) • Transformations (finite — very, very small in number) • This system is capable of generating an infinite number of sentences.

  14. Word Order Typology English: They ate an apple (SVO) Russian: Oni yabloko syeli (SOV)they apple ate Turkish: Onlar elma yediler (SOV)they apple ate

  15. Word Order Typology SOV - Russian, Turkish, Basque, Burmese, Japanese, Hindi, Korean, Quechua, Guugu Ymidhirr, Aleut, German (?) SVO - English, Spanish, Italian, French, Latin, Chinese VSO - Irish, Welsh, Berber, Hebrew, Maori, Maasai VOS - Malagasy OVS - Amazon Basin OSV - ???

  16. Case Marking Typology SOV - Russian, Turkish, Basque, Burmese, Japanese, Hindi, Korean, Quechua, Guugu Ymidhirr, Aleut, German (?) SVO - English, Spanish, Italian, French, Latin, Chinese VSO - Irish, Welsh, Berber, Hebrew, Maori, Maasai VOS - Malagasy OVS - Amazon Basin OSV - ???

  17. Typology re Case-Marking • Nominative-accusative languages (e.g. English, Japanese) The subject of a transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb receive the same case marker (nominative). • Ergative-absolutive languages (e.g. Basque) The object of a transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb receive the same case (absolutive).

  18. Typology re Case-Marking • She hit him. He arrived. [nom] [acc] [nom] • Basque Aita ethorri du. father came ‘My father came.’ [absolutive] Ni-k aita maite du. I father love [ergative] [absolutive] ‘I love my father’

  19. WH questions [advanced] • WH words ask questions in simple sentences, but can also ask questions in complex sentences — implying “long distance relations/dependencies”. • What did Bill say that Mary saw ___? • Where did Bill say that Tom took Mary __? • Who did Bill say that Tom claimed that Helen spoke to ___?

  20. WH and syntactic mysteries • The boy that I spoke to at noon said he bought a book yesterday at the bookstore. • When did the boy say he bought the book? • --At noon • --Yesterday • The question word when can be extracted from the main or embedded sentence

  21. WH and syntactic mysteries • When did the boy say where he bought the book? • --At noon • --*Yesterday • The question word when can only be associated with the main clause (= sentence), not the embedded sentence

  22. WH and syntactic mysteries • What is the difference between the two questions? • When did the boy say ___ he bought the book ___? • When did the boy say ___ where he bought the book ___? • The second sentence has a WH word at the left edge of the embedded S

More Related