1 / 12

Hybrid-Selection Optimum Combining

Hybrid-Selection Optimum Combining. Jack H. Winters Moe Win. AT&T Labs - Research Middletown, NJ USA May 7, 2001. OUTLINE. Introduction Single Link Results Cellular Performance Conclusions. W 1. Output. . Output. W M. Diversity Techniques. Selection :.

arav
Télécharger la présentation

Hybrid-Selection Optimum Combining

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hybrid-Selection Optimum Combining Jack H. Winters Moe Win AT&T Labs - Research Middletown, NJ USA May 7, 2001

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Single Link Results • Cellular Performance • Conclusions

  3. W1 Output  Output WM Diversity Techniques Selection: • Select antenna with the highest received signal power Maximal ratio combining: • Weight and combine signals to maximize signal-to-noise ratio (M-fold diversity)

  4. W1 Output  WM Diversity Techniques (cont.) Optimum combining: • Weight and combine signals to maximize signal-to- interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) • Suppresses K<M-1 interferers with M-K diversity gain

  5. Hybrid Diversity Techniques • RF chains are the most expensive component • Therefore, select L out of M antennas • H-S/MRC: Select L antennas with the highest S/N and combine with maximal ratio combining • Proposed Technique: Hybrid-Selection/Optimum Combining (H-S/OC) • Select L out of M antennas that maximize SINR with optimum combining

  6. H-S/OC Issues • Unlike H-S/MRC, no known technique to find best set of L => exhaustive search of all M!/(L!(M-L)!) combinations required • Need to know interference level => training sequences

  7. H-S/OC for L=1 • Selection based on SINR versus S • Rayleigh fading of desired and K equal-power interferers • 5 dB gain for M=10

  8. H-S/OC for L>1 • K equal-power interferers • K=L-1: interference suppression with increasing diversity gain as M increases • K=L: for L=M, only a few dB better than MRC, but increasing improvement of H-S/OC over H-S/MRC as M increases • Improvement even for K=L+1

  9. Cellular System Results • ANSI-136 model • 98 cells for N=7, 36 cells for N=1,3,4 (3 sectors/cell) • Computer simulation for outage probability (BER > 2 X 10e-2) with 60% loading

  10. Uplink Results • 10% outage requires: • L=1: • M=2 for N=3,4 • M=15 for N=1 • L=2: • M=4 for N=1

  11. Downlink Results • Results similar to, but slightly better than, uplink results • L=3 performance at: • L=2, M=4 • L=1, M=16 • As L increases, outage decreases faster with M

  12. Conclusions • Proposed Hybrid-Selection/Optimum Combining • Suppresses K>L-1 interferers if L<M • Improvement increases with M even for M>>L • For ANSI-136, dramatically reduces outage • 7-fold capacity increase with L=1, M=12 or L=2, M=4 • Suppresses multiple strong interferers and obtains diversity gain with a small number of receiver chains

More Related