1 / 68

Genital Human Papillomavirus: DNA based Epidemiology

Genital Human Papillomavirus: DNA based Epidemiology. Anil K.Chaturvedi, D.V.M., M.P.H. Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Papillomaviridae Most common viral STD Double stranded DNA virus ~8 Kb Entire DNA sequence known. HPV genome. Classification of HPV types.

arawn
Télécharger la présentation

Genital Human Papillomavirus: DNA based Epidemiology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Genital Human Papillomavirus:DNA based Epidemiology Anil K.Chaturvedi, D.V.M., M.P.H

  2. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) • Papillomaviridae • Most common viral STD • Double stranded DNA virus ~8 Kb • Entire DNA sequence known

  3. HPV genome

  4. Classification of HPV types • Defined by <90% DNA sequence homology in L1, E6 and E7 genes • >100 recognized types, at least 40 infect genital tract • 90-98% homology- sub-types • <2% heterogeneity- intratype variants

  5. Genital HPV- Histo-pathology *Tyring SK, American journal of medicine, 1997

  6. HPV and Cervical cancer • Second most common cancer worldwide • HPV is a “ necessary cause”: ~ 99.7% of cervical cancer cases • Support from several molecular and epidemiologic studies • Protein products of E6 and E7 genes oncogenic

  7. HPV-molecular biology Tindle RW, Nature Reviews, Cancer, Vol2: Jan2002

  8. HPV-molecular biology Herald Zur Hausen, Nature Reviews, Cancer Volume 2:5; May; 2002.

  9. HPV- Oncogenic transformation

  10. HPV-Epidemiology Koutsky, LA, American Journal of Medicine, May 5, Vol 102, 1997.

  11. Crude estimates of HPV impact in women >15 years

  12. Cervical cancer in US SEER data and Statistics, CDC.

  13. Diagnosis • Pap smears- Current recommendations (US) • Normal on 3 consecutive annual- 3 year screening • Abnormal-no HPV- Annual • Abnormal- evidence of HPV- 6-12 months • LSIL/HSIL- colposcopy

  14. HPV diagnosis Clinical diagnosis: Genital warts Epithelial defects See cellular changes caused by the virus: Pap smear screening Directly detect the virus: DNA hybridization or PCR* Detect previous infection: Detection of antibody against HPV* * Done in the Hagensee Laboratory

  15. Utility of HPV screening • Primary prevention of CC • Secondary prevention • Component of Bethesda 2001 recommendations • Prevalent genotypes for vaccine design strategies

  16. Natural history of Cervical neoplasia Rates of progression CIN I CIN II CIN III 5% 1% 12% CC

  17. HPV-CC: epidemiologic considerations • HPV is a “necessary cause”, not a “sufficient cause” for CC • Near perfect sensitivity P(T+/D+), very poor positive predictive value P(D+/T+) • Interplay of co-factors in progression

  18. Host genetic • P53 and • HLA polymorphisms Herald Zur Hausen, Nature Reviews, Cancer Volume 2:5; May; 2002

  19. HIV+ vs. HIV- story • HIV+ men and women, 4-6 times greater risk of incident, prevalent and persistent HPV infections • Increased cytologic abnormalities and HPV associated lesions difficult to treat

  20. Prevalence of 27 HPV genotypes in Women with Diverse Profiles Anil K Chaturvedi1, Jeanne Dumestre2, Ann M. Gaffga2, Kristina M. Mire,2Rebecca A.Clark2, Patricia S.Braly3, Kathleen Dunlap3,Patricia J. Kissinger1, and Michael E. Hagensee2

  21. Goals of study • Characterize prevalent HPV types in 3 risk settings-Low-risk HIV-, high-risk HIV- and HIV+ women • Characterize geotypes associated with cytologic abnormalities • Risk factor analyses

  22. Methods Low-risk clinic N=68 High-risk clinic N=376 HIV+ N=167 Cervical swabs and Pap smears N=611 36 LR (52.9%) 232 HR (61.7%) 95 HIV+ (56.8%) Took screening questionnaire N=363

  23. Methods • Inclusion/ exclusion criteria: • >18 years • Non-pregnant • Non-menstruating • Chronic hepatic/ renal conditions • Informed consent

  24. Methods • HPV assessment: DNA from cervical swabsPolymerase chain reaction using PGMy09/11 consensus primer system reverse line hybridization (Roche molecular systems, CA)

  25. HPV genotyping Roche molecular systems Inc., Alameda, CA.

  26. HPV classification • Strip detects 27 HPV types (18 high-risk, 9 low-risk types) • Types 6, 11, 40, 42, 53, 54, 57, 66, 84 : low-eisk • Types 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 68, 82, 83, 73: high-risk • Classified as Any HPV, HR, LR, and multiple (any combination)

  27. Pap smears • Classified – 1994 Bethesda recommendations • Normal, ASCUS, SIL (LSIL and HSIL)

  28. Data analysis • Bivariate analyses- Chi-squared or Fischer’s exact • Binary logistic regression for unadjusted and adjusted OR and 95% CI • Multinomial logistic regression for Pap smear comparisons (Normal, ASCUS and SIL)

  29. Analysis • Risk factor analysis for HPV infection- Any, HR, LR and multiple (dependent variables) • P<0.20 on bivariate and clinically relevant included in multivariate • All hypothesis two-sided, alpha 0.05 • No corrections for multiple comparisons

  30. Demographics of cohort • HIV+ older than HIV- [34.51 (SD=9.08) vs. 26.72 (SD=8,93) ] p<0.05 • Predominantly African American ~80% • HIV+ more likely to report history of STD infections, multiparity, smoking (ever) and # of sex partners in last year ( All P<0.05) • 16.8% of HIV+ immunosuppressed (CD4 counts < 200) • 54% Viral load >10,000 copies

  31. Clinic comparisons * * * * * P for trend <0.001

  32. Genotype prevalence-high-risk types

  33. Genotype prevalence-low-risk types

  34. Rank order by prevalence

  35. Pap smear associations • Any HPV, high-risk HPV, low-risk HPV and multiple HPV with ASCUS and LSIL (p<0.01) • ASCUS- types 18, 35 • LSIL: 16, 35, 51, 52, 68

  36. CD4 cell counts (<200 vs.>200) HIV-RNA viral loads Any HPV 6.41(0.77,52.8) 2.57(0.86, 7.64) High-risk HPV 6.42(1.34,30.8) 1.59(0.64, 3.92) Low-risk HPV 2.79(0.99, 7.89) 2.27(0.97, 5.29) Multiple HPV 5.92(1.85,18.8) 1.10(0.46, 2.60) Cytologic abnormalitiesb 4.21(1.28,13.7) 0.93(0.34, 2.58) HIV+ sub-set analyses, N=167, multivariate

  37. Risk-factor analyses • Multivariate models: simultaneous adjustment for age, prior number of pregnancies, history of STD infections (self-reported), # of sex partners in previous year and HIV status • Any HPV: younger age (<25 years), and HIV+ status ( OR=6.31; 95%CI, 2.94-13.54) • High-risk HPV: Younger age (<25) and HIV+ status (OR= 5.30, 2.44-11.51) • Low-risk HPV: Only HIV status (OR=12.11, 4.04-36.26)

  38. Conclusions • Increased prevalence of novel/uncharacterized genotypes (83 and 53) in HIV+ • Pap smear associations on predicted patterns • CD4 counts edge viral loads out • No interaction between HPV and HIV- HPV equally oncogenic in HIV+ and HIV- • Differential risk factor profiles for infection with oncogenic and non-oncogenic types

  39. Discussion • Increased 83 and 53, also observed in HERS and WHIS reports • Probable reactivation of latent infection • 83 and 53 more susceptible to immune loss??- also found in renal transplant subjects

  40. What puts HIV+ at greater risk? Palefsky JM, Cancer epi Biomarkers and Prev, 1997.

  41. Risk in HIV+ • 1.Increased HPV infections ? • 2. Increased persistence ? • 3. Systemic immunosuppression- tumor surveillance • 4. Direct-HIV-HPV interactions? • 5.Increased multiple infections?

  42. Study limitations • Cross-sectional study- no information on duration of HPV infections (big player!) • HIV- subjects predominantly high-risk- selection bias- bias to null • Genotypic associations based on small numbers • Multiple comparisons- increased Type I error-chance associations

  43. Limitations • Incomplete demographic information- no differences in rates of HPV infections • No associations in demographics- low power

  44. Impact of Multiple HPV infections: Compartmentalization of risk Anil K Chaturvedi1, Jeanne Dumestre2, Issac V.Snowhite, Joeli A. Brinkman,2Rebecca A.Clark2, Patricia S.Braly3, Kathleen Dunlap3,Patricia J. Kissinger1, and Michael E. Hagensee2

  45. Background • Multiple HPV infections- increased persistence • Persistent HPV infection-necessary for maintenance of malignant phenotype • Impact of multiple HPV infections- not well characterized

  46. Goals 1.Characterize prevalence of multiple HPV infections in HIV+ and HIV- women 2. Does the risk of cytologic abnormalities differ by oncogenic-non-oncogenic combination categories 3. Compartmentalize impact of mutiple HPV infections in a multi-factorial scenario

  47. Methods • Cross-sectional study, non-probability convenience sample 1278 HIV- women 264 HIV+ women Cervical swabs 1542 women 989 women Both HPV and Pap data available

  48. Methods • Exposure: HPV DNA status- polychotomous variable (no infection, single HPV type, HR-HR combinations, HR-LR combinations, mixed combinations) • Exposure assessment- reverse line probe hybridization

  49. Methods • Outcome: Pap smear status • Binary outcome: normal, abnormal (ASCUS and above)

  50. Statistical analysis • Bivariate- Chi-squared, Fischer’s exact tests • Multivariate: Binary logistic regression, likelihood ratio improvement tests, goodness-of-fit tests (model diagnostics-best fit model) • Covariate Adjusted attributable fractions- from best fit logistic models

More Related