1 / 8

DCF Central Placement Team Transition

DCF Central Placement Team Transition. Supporting integration with the CT BHP Administrative Services Organization A presentation to the CT BHP Oversight Council September 13, 2006. Overview of Process.

arch
Télécharger la présentation

DCF Central Placement Team Transition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DCF Central Placement Team Transition Supporting integration with the CT BHP Administrative Services Organization A presentation to the CT BHP Oversight Council September 13, 2006

  2. Overview of Process • Residential and Level II Group Home levels of care are the costliest and most intensive services DCF funds • CPT staff at DCF process over 2000 requests for placement annually (Area office, CSSD and Parole) • In any given year, approximately 300-350 RTC and Level II Group Home “slots” become available

  3. Why change the process? • DCF appreciates the complexity of managing the high volume of requests against existing resources and the need to identify alternative treatment plans when necessary • Contract with ValueOptions requires authorization, continued care review and transition planning for RTC and Group Home levels of care • Using existing IT resources within VO, DCF is planning to streamline the CPT process to enhance efficiency and support appropriate clinical match of service to need

  4. Current Protocol • All CPT “packets” are reviewed by DCF/CSSD Central Placement Team staff and authorized by Value Options Care Managers • CPT staff are responsible for matching child’s clinical needs to appropriate program • VO Care Managers are responsible for tracking child’s clinical progress and assisting with discharge planning

  5. Enhanced Protocol • DCF “469” form to be replaced with standardized instrument customized for CT • CANS: Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment • Communication Tool designed to organize clinical and psycho-social information • Can be programmed to interface with existing VO data base (member and provider files) to support clinical and data reporting operations • Identification of community alternatives for those 1700 youth who will not go to RTC or Level II Group Home care

  6. More information on the CANS • Not meant to replace clinical evaluations, discharge summaries, school or medical records • Not used as an alternative to the RTC and Group Home Level of Care Guidelines • Designed to organize clinical information to support justification for these restrictive levels of care (or not) • A descriptive tool, not an evaluation or clinical assessment instrument

  7. CANS (cont) • Designed for use in public domain to assist state agencies in developing appropriate treatment planning strategies • DCF CPT staff, area office staff, parole staff and CSSD staff have reviewed and provided input to revised CT version • VO able to easily import from New Jersey ASO service site

  8. For additional information: www.buddinpraed.org • Provider Subcommittee discussion to be scheduled for September/October • Implementation scheduled for November, 2006

More Related