1 / 23

4.2. Carbon accounting: Quick Steps

4.2. Carbon accounting: Quick Steps. Markku Kanninen, CIFOR. Outline. Steps in measuring and monitoring Carbon pools Baseline (reference) scenario Changes in carbon stocks Leakage and additionality Calculate the totals - carbon sequestered or emission avoided Examples.

aren
Télécharger la présentation

4.2. Carbon accounting: Quick Steps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 4.2. Carbon accounting: Quick Steps Markku Kanninen, CIFOR

  2. Outline • Steps in measuring and monitoring • Carbon pools • Baseline (reference) scenario • Changes in carbon stocks • Leakage and additionality • Calculate the totals - carbon sequestered or emission avoided • Examples

  3. Steps [simplified] for measuring and monitoring carbon stocks in a forestry project • Define the carbon pools to be measured and monitored • Define the baseline (reference) scenario • Estimate the changes in carbon stocks in trees and in soil • Analyze leakage and additionality • Calculate the carbon sequestered (or emission avoided) by the project activity

  4. Define the carbon pools to be measured and monitored Trees • Possible pools (IPCC, 2003) • Above-ground biomass • Below-ground biomass • Dead wood • Litter • Soil carbon Above-ground biomass Other above-ground biomass Dead wood Litter Below-ground biomass Soil carbon

  5. Carbon pools to be measured and monitored • Measure and monitor only those C pools that are changing considerably due to proposed activity (CDM project, REDD scheme) and can be measured and monitored cost-efficiently • E.g. some approved CDM methodologies do not include soil carbon, litter, and dead wood • Under CDM rules, if a pool becomes a source (emission) due to project activity, it has to be measured, monitored, and reported. In REDD, there is no decision on this yet

  6. Carbon pools to be measured and monitored • Trees account for largest pool (60-90% of total) of the total aboveground biomass (AGB) • Important to get this right – put emphasis here • Highest proportion of AGB of tress in stems • Easiest, because data and models available • Use robust models for belowground biomass based on aboveground biomass • Other pools can be estimated conservatively from default factors (literature), e.g.: • Dead wood (standing and lying) up to about 15% of AGB • Understory up to about 5% of AGB

  7. Define the baseline (reference) scenario • What would happen without the project? • The scenario of emissions by sources or removals by sinks of GHG’s that would occur in the absence of the proposed project/program • The sum of the changes in carbon stocks in the carbon pools within the project boundary that would have occurred in the absence of the project/program activity (CDM or REDD) Project Baseline 2 Baseline 1 Project Baseline 2 Baseline 1

  8. Estimate changes in carbon stocks in trees and in soil • Use equations and default values to calculate the changes in the carbon stocks ex ante • Creating projections to the future • Develop measuring and monitoring protocol for the carbon pools consisting of • Stratification of the project area to improve the accuracy and precision of biomass estimates • Sampling design • Definition of data and parameters to be monitored • Methods to be used & frequency of monitoring

  9. Additionality & leakage • Additionality - provide an explanation to show that the project activity would not have occurred anyway • Use one or several from the list of barriers • Investment barriers; institutional barriers; technological barriers; barriers relating to local tradition; barriers due to prevailing practice; barriers due to local ecological conditions; barriers due to social conditions • Leakage - provide an explanation to show that leakage due to displacement of project activities does not happen, or if it happens, provide and estimation of the emissions caused by it

  10. Examples

  11. IPCC GPG: 3-tier approach • Tier 1—use of default factors provided at continental scale, stratified by general biome class; IPCC reports 6 types based on wet to dry climate and lowland to montane - (high uncertainty) • Tier 2—some country specific data from a variety of sources and assessment of fate of carbon (burned, left to decompose, etc.) - (high to medium uncertainty) • Tier 3—advanced methods and detailed country specific data, including national inventories, measurements systems repeated through time, etc. - (low uncertainty)

  12. Stratification • Allows to obtain a certain precision of estimations with lower cost than without stratification • Steps: • Divide heterogeneous population into homogenous groups • Apply monitoring (sampling & calculations) to each strata and compile results at the end

  13. Using growth and yield tables • In some cases (e.g. plantations) growth and yield tables exist – description of stand development • Example: Age – Tree height – Diameter – Number of trees – Basal area - Volume

  14. Using growth and yield tables(2) • Stem diameters • Estimate (ex ante) or measure stem diameter of the trees • Stem volume • Obtain total volume of the stand from the tables or from volume equations • Biomass • Convert stem volumes to stem biomass by using conversion factors – or • Use allometric equations (biomass expansion factors) to calculate total tree biomass from stem biomass - or • Use allometric equations to estimate total tree biomass directly from stem diameter • Carbon • Convert biomass and carbon by using a conversion factor (0.50)

  15. Allometric equations Stem diameter vs. stem volume Stem diameter vs. total above-ground biomass Tectona grandis Bombacopsis quinata Perez & Kanninen, 2003a Perez & Kanninen, 2002

  16. Case study: maple-beech-birch stands in the U.S. Northeast Source: Smith at al. 2005

  17. Case study: maple-beech-birch stands in the U.S. Northeast • Case 1: What is the carbon stock in living trees at ages of 25 and 45 years? What is the net carbon stock change over this interval? • Carbon stocks in living trees are 53.2 and 87.8 t/ha for years 25 and 45, respectively (Table 2 above) • Net annual stock change = (87.8 – 53.2) / 20 = 1.7 t/ha/yr • Case 2: What is the total carbon stock of the five IPCC pools (see slide 3) at the age of 55? • Above-ground biomass: 142.7 (total nonsoil) • Below-ground biomass: N.A. • Dead wood: 14.5 t/ha (standing dead tree + down dead wood) • Litter: we don’t know, because in the above table “forest floor” = litter + humus + fine roots in the organic layer above mineral soil. In the IPCC definition fine roots are part of “below-ground biomass” • Soil carbon: 69.6 t/ha (soil organic) • Total carbon stock in the above table: 212.2 t/ha (nonsoil+soil)

  18. USAID/WinrockForest Carbon Calculator • Combines global datasets on carbon biomass, deforestation, tree growth rates, impacts of forest management • Forest protection, reforestation/afforestation, forest management, agroforestry • Not full IPCC Tier 3 analysis, but better than Tier 2 in many cases • Simple way to quickly estimate CO2 benefits of projects • Available on-line at: http://winrock.stage.datarg.net

  19. Output example Baseline = Grassland carbon in trees and soil Project = Robinia sp. carbon in trees and soil Moldova Soil Conservation Project (Source: Winrock, 2005) CO2FIX output for Robinia afforestation for Moldova

  20. Thank you for your attention

  21. General references • Brown, S. 1997 Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO Forestry Paper no. 134. • Brown, S. 2002 Measuring carbon in forests: current status and futurechallenges Environ. Pollut. 116 363–72. • Brown, S. and Gaston, G. 1995 Use of forest inventories and geographic information systems to estimate biomass density of tropical forests: applications to tropical Africa Environ. Monit. Assess. 38 157–68. • Pearson, T., Walker, S. and Brown, S. 2005 Sourcebook for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Winrock International and the BioCarbon Fund of the World Bank. 57 p. • Penman. J. et al. 2003 Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Program and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan. Available at: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf.htm. • Pérez Cordero, L.D. and Kanninen, M. 2002 Wood specific gravity and aboveground biomass of Bombacopsis quinata plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 165:1-9. • Pérez Cordero, L.D. and Kanninen, M. 2003a Provisional equations for estimating total and merchantable volume of Tectona grandis trees in Costa Rica. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 13(4): 345-359. • Pérez Cordero, L.D. and Kanninen, M. 2003b Aboveground biomass of Tectona grandis plantations in Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 15(1): 199-213.

  22. Afforestation and reforestation • Cd4Cdm. 2005a Clean Development Mechanism PDD Guidebook: Navigating the Pitfalls. UNEP Risø Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark. www.cd4cdm.org. • Cd4Cdm. 2005b Baseline Methodologies For Clean Development Mechanism Projects: a Guidebook. UNEP Risø Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark. www.cd4cdm.org • Executive Board. 2005 Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality in A/R CDM project activities. Report of the 21st meeting of the CDM Executive Board, Sept 2005, Annex 16. Available at: http://cdm.unfccc.int/EB • Methodologies for AR CDM Projects http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/ARmethodologies/approved_ar.html. • Pearson, T., Walker, S. and Brown, S. 2006 Guidebook for the Formulation of Afforestation and Reforestation Projects under the Clean Development Mechanism. ITTO Technical Series 25, International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan. www.itto.or.jp. • Winrock International. 2005 Gaining approval for LULCF projects and project methodologies under the CDM: Lessons learned. Side Event at COP 11. http://www.winrock.org/ecosystems/files/COP11_Winrock_Talk_12022005.pdf

  23. REDD • Angelsen. A. (Ed.) 2008 Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. Pp. 99-106. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BAngelsen0801.pdf. • CIFOR Infobrief 15. 2008 What is the right scale for REDD? The implications of national, subnational and nested approaches” by Arild Angelsen, Charlotte Streck, Leo Peskett, Jessica Brown & Cecilia Luttrell (http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Infobrief/015-infobrief.pdf) • CIFOR Infobrief 16. 2008 Measuring and monitoring forest degradation for REDD: Implications of country circumstances” by Daniel Murdiyarso, Margaret Skutsch, Manuel Guariguata, Markku Kanninen & Cecilia Luttrell, Pita Verweij and Osvaldo Stella (http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Infobrief/016-infobrief.pdf) • Meridian Institute. 2009 Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Assessment Report. Prepared for the Government of Norway, by Arild Angelsen, Sandra Brown, Cyril Loisel, Leo Peskett, Charlotte Streck, and Daniel Zarin. Available at: http://www.REDD-OAR.org

More Related