1 / 31

Phosphorus Fate and Transport in an Impounded River System

Phosphorus Fate and Transport in an Impounded River System. Implications for TMDL Stakeholders and Extension Educators. Dean Baas MSU Geological Sciences Department MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station. Presentation Outline.

arlo
Télécharger la présentation

Phosphorus Fate and Transport in an Impounded River System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phosphorus Fate and Transport in an Impounded River System Implications for TMDL Stakeholders and Extension Educators Dean Baas MSU Geological Sciences Department MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station

  2. Presentation Outline • Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River phosphorus TMDL • Overview • Research • Lake Allegan phosphorus • Sources • Point • Nonpoint • Kalamazoo River watershed phosphorus sources, fate and transport • Agriculture • Urban • Impoundments • Implications for TMDL stakeholders and extension educators • Preliminary Conclusions • Questions and Discussion

  3. Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River phosphorus TMDL watershed • 1600 mi2 watershed in Southwest Michigan • Agricultural watershed • Nationally recognized stakeholder drivenphosphorus TMDL Grand Rapids Battle Creek Kalamazoo Portage

  4. Lake Allegan • EPA 303d list as phosphorus impaired waterbody • 2.5 mi2 impoundment hydroelectric dam impoundment • Periodic nuisance algal blooms • Carp/Catfish

  5. Lake Allegan Water Quality • Reductions allocated as follows: • Point source dischargers – 23% • All other sources of phosphorus (NPS) - 50%

  6. Total Maximum Daily Load “The primary purpose of the TMDL program is to protect public health and the health of impaired aquatic ecosystems by ensuring attainment of water quality standards, including beneficial uses.” US EPA, 1998

  7. TMDL Research Education and Extension • Michigan State University Extension Land & Water Program at KBS received: • In 2001, a $249,000 319 grant to develop a nonpoint source tracking system, and help develop, coordinate & track implementation activities.

  8. TMDL Research Education and Extension • Michigan State University Extension Land & Water Program at KBS received: • In 2001, a $249,000 319 grant to develop a nonpoint source tracking system, and help develop, coordinate & track implementation activities. • In 2003, a $485,000 USDA-CSREES Integrated Water Program grant to: • Characterize the sources, fate and transport of phosphorus in the TMDL watershed. • Integrate research, education, and extension to enhance phosphorus reduction strategies through the stakeholder driven TMDL organization.

  9. Research 17 16 15 3 2 8 13 14 6 4 10 5 9 7 11 12 1

  10. Research - Sampling • Auto-samplers (1 parameter) • Daily composite TP • Weekly grab samples (17 parameters) • TP, TDP, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, NO3-, SO42-, alkalinity, temperature, pH, specific conductance, DO, %DO, chlorophyll A • Four synoptic samplings (40 parameters) • Weekly + Sc, Ti, V, Zn, Cr, Co, Cu, As, Se, Rb, Mo, Sn, Pb, Mn, Fe Sr, Ba, U, Al, B, Ni, Cd, Ag • Discharge • USGS gaging stations • Isco autosampler stage

  11. Phosphorus Sources – Lake Allegan • 1998 MDEQ Load Estimate: 145,200 lbs/g.s. • 2005 Load Estimate: 98,400 lbs/g.s (32 % reduction) • 2006 Load Estimate: 120,800 lbs/g.s. (17% reduction)

  12. Phosphorus Sources

  13. 46 – 88 lbs/mi2 28 – 51 lbs/mi2 43 – 69 lbs/mi2 17 – 37 lbs/mi2 Phosphorus Sources Growing Season NPS TP Exports • Excludes urban areas • Mixed landuse watersheds In General NPS Export Coefficients Increase

  14. Phosphorus SourcesNPS Agricultural Phosphorus Fractions DP:TP = 25 % PP:TP = 75 % DP:TP = 70 % PP:TP = 30 % DP:TP = 40 % PP:TP = 60 %

  15. Phosphorus Sources Agricultural TMDL Implications DP:TP = 25 % PP:TP = 75 % DP:TP = 70 % PP:TP = 30 % • Agricultural watersheds • Conventional approach is to reduce P by promoting soil conservation BMPs • High dissolved P watersheds • Less effective • Need to reduce P inputs • High particulate P watersheds • More effective DP:TP = 40 % PP:TP = 60 %

  16. Phosphorus SourcesGrowing Season Urban NPS TP Exports • Urban areas • Kalamazoo/Portage • Battle Creek 170 - 370 lbs/mi2 230 – 430 lbs/mi2

  17. Phosphorus SourcesUrban NPS TP Exports • Kalamazoo urban event

  18. Phosphorus SourcesUrban TMDL Implications • Urban watersheds • Event sampling required to capture source • Continue storm water management efforts 170 - 370 lbs/mi2 230 – 430 lbs/mi2

  19. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Three Impoundments • Emmett Street Dam • Morrow Lake • Lake Allegan • Influence sources, transport and fate of phosphorus

  20. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Emmett Street impoundment sinking phosphorus • 2005: 1700 lbs • 2006: 2600 lbs • Reducing the export of phosphorus

  21. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Emmett Street impoundment • Fed by the Battle Creek River • High ratio of dissolved to total phosphorus • Impoundment sinking DP • Suggest DP precipitation • Geochemical process

  22. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Morrow Lake Impoundment sourcing phosphorus • 2005: 19,000 lbs • 2006: 9,500 lbs • Increasing the export of phosphorus

  23. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Morrow Lake • 1.7 mi2 impoundment • Located approximately 2/3 down the watershed • Mediates phosphorus transport

  24. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Outlet growing season mean TP concentration relatively constant • Varying inlet concentrations

  25. flow Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • During the growing season, Morrow Lake inlet to outlet: • Particulate phosphorus increases • Dissolved phosphorus decreases • Dissolved nitrate decreases

  26. flow Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • 2006 Chlorophyll A sampled • Chlorophyll A increases with particulate phosphorus • Algal activity • Biological process

  27. The Morrow Impoundment: Decouples the upstream portion of the watershed Replaces phosphorus reduced in that region Forces the downstream portion of the watershed to produce reductions to meet Lake Allegan TMDL goals Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments P reduction towards goal No net P reduction P reduced P replaced

  28. Phosphorus Sources, Transport and FateImpoundments • Lake Allegan impoundment sinking phosphorus • 2005: 15,000 lbs • 2006: 28,000 lbs • Storing phosphorus which slows the recovery

  29. Implications for TMDL Stakeholders and Extension Educators • Sources of total phosphorus are not sufficient for reduction strategies • Phosphorus fractions • BMP selection • Phosphorus source and fraction changes could have unexpected impact • Phosphorus processes are important • Biological • Geochemical • Can help, hurt, or mediate • Outputs may change with input changes • Impoundments • Environment for processes • Time for processes • Impact timeframe for improvement

  30. Preliminary Conclusions • Detailed phosphorus and chemistry data is required to develop TMDL phosphorus reduction strategies • Phosphorus analysis should include phosphorus forms • BMP recommendations should be based on phosphorus forms • Impoundments should be evaluated to determine their impact on the transport and fate of phosphorus • Target reduction must consider the long term impact of phosphorus processes

  31. Questions and Discussion

More Related