1 / 20

Recent History at Indian Brook Reservoir

Development and Implementation of an Invasive Aquatic Plant Management Program at Indian Brook Reservoir Essex, Vermont Marc Bellaud VP/Aquatic Biologist. Recent History at Indian Brook Reservoir. Eurasian watermilfoil identified in 1999

arty
Télécharger la présentation

Recent History at Indian Brook Reservoir

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development and Implementation of an Invasive Aquatic Plant Management Program at Indian Brook ReservoirEssex, VermontMarc BellaudVP/Aquatic Biologist

  2. Recent History at Indian Brook Reservoir • Eurasian watermilfoil identified in 1999 • Comprehensive survey performed in 2001 and 5-year IMP developed • Permit filed in winter 2001/2002 for Sonar (fluridone) herbicide treatment • Milfoil population naturally crashed • Permit application withdrawn • Milfoil has now recovered to nuisance densities

  3. 2001 Plant Distribution • EWM growth pattern changed in 2004 and infestation rapidly expanded • Total lake area = 50 acres • Milfoil cover estimated in 22 acres • Possible milfoil expansion to 30 acres or 60% of lake based on bathymetry • Milfoil disappeared? • Elodea was dominant native plant in 2001 - was not observed in 2011

  4. 2011 Survey Findings • Surveyed same points • Used GPS technology • Milfoil found at 36% of sample locations in 2011 (50% in 2001) • 12 species in 2011 (10 species in 2001) • 6 species were found during both surveys

  5. Comparison of milfoil cover

  6. Current management recommendations • Agree on Management Objectives - Define Control • Control milfoil • Prevent introduction/establishment of other invasives • Preserve diverse plant assemblage for habitat • Maintain water quality • Improve recreational access • Initiate new 5-year IMP • Recommended herbicide: Renovate (triclopyr) • Why the switch in herbicides: from Sonar (fluridone) to Renovate (triclopyr)?

  7. Integrated Management Program • 5-Year program integrating chemical treatment with non-chemical controls • The Town must commit to continuing with non-chemical controls as part of this integrated milfoil management program. Techniques that should be considered: • Suction harvesting (DASH) • SCUBA diver hand-pulling (paid) • Snorkel hand-pulling (volunteer) • Volunteer monitoring • Boat launch inspections • Education

  8. Why Renovate herbicide? SONAR (fluridone) • In 2001 only Sonar (fluridone) had been permitted for use in Vermont and >40% of lake supported milfoil • Whole-lake treatment would be required • In 2011 less than 20% of lake supported dense milfoil growth RENOVATE (triclopyr) • Renovate has been the primary herbicide used for milfoil control in VT since 2006 • Provides highly selective control of milfoil • Effective for partial-lake or spot treatments • Lower cost

  9. Jurisdiction • VTDEC can issue a permit for pesticide use when the following five findings are made: 1) There is no reasonable non-chemical alternative available; 2) There is acceptable risk to the non-target environment; 3) There is negligible risk to public health; 4) A long-range management plan has been developed which incorporates a schedule of pesticide minimization 5) There is a public benefit to be achieved from the application of the pesticide, or in the case of a pond located entirely on a landowner’s property, no undue adverse effect upon the public good.

  10. Untreated 1 WAT 4 WAT Renovate Concentration Exposure Time Source: US Army Engineers – ERDC Control Predictions A: 0 - 70 % (regrowth likely) B: 70 - 85 % (regrowth potential subject to site conditions) C: >85 % (limited regrowth potential)

  11. Two formulations available Renovate 3 Renovate OTF

  12. Initial flash (~50% in 1 hr) • Peaks at ~24 hr

  13. CET Relationship • Renovate OTF alters the classical concentration-exposure time relationship • Increases the exposure component • Decreases the concentration component >85% Control of EWM achieved: ConcentrationExposure (hr) 0.25 ppm 72 hr 0.5 ppm 48 hr 1 ppm 36 hr 1.5 ppm 24 hr 2 to 2.5 ppm 18 hr Renovate OTF Renovate 3

  14. Renovate OTF treatment recommendations • Target treatment of all dense beds which is estimated at 16 acres • Dose 2.0 to 2.5 ppm in bottom 4 feet • Timing – mid June • Water use restrictions: • No swimming for 2 days • Drinking resumes <75 ppb (~ 1 week) • Irrigation varies

  15. Projected 5-year IMP costs for Indian Brook Reservoir

  16. 2001

  17. 2011…

More Related