1 / 14

World Bank Approach to Financing Heating Infrastructure – Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Region

World Bank Approach to Financing Heating Infrastructure – Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Region. Presentation at Conference on Heating Sector Institutional Reform in the FSU Baku, October 21, 2005. Typical Approaches to Heating Sector Improvements.

arwen
Télécharger la présentation

World Bank Approach to Financing Heating Infrastructure – Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. World Bank Approach to Financing Heating Infrastructure – Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Region Presentation at Conference on Heating Sector Institutional Reform in the FSU Baku, October 21, 2005

  2. Typical Approaches to Heating Sector Improvements • Institutional reform, pricing, subsidy restructuring • Supply-side upgrades, system conversions • Demand-side improvements through financial intermediation and/or energy service company (ESCO) models

  3. World Bank Study – Coping with the Cold • Survey data from Armenia, Croatia, Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova and Tajikistan • Study focused on both district heating and individual solutions based on electricity, fossil fuels and fuelwood • Included willingness-to-pay surveys in several countries

  4. Coping with the Cold, Challenges • Inability to regulate individual demand in DH systems. Over- and under-heating is frequent • Heating infrastructure is deteriorating due to under-investment and mismanagement • Low collection rates - unable to disconnect non-payers • Many networks fully or partly abandoned • Consumers substitute with dirty energy

  5. Coping with the Cold, Poor vs. Non-Poor • Non-poor people spend $30-50 per year on heat • Poor people spend $25-40 per year on heat • The non-poor has better quality of heating with fewer adverse health consequences • poor people’s heat demand is quite unelastic – this means that if DH prices go up and they can not control demand, they cannot and will not pay for service

  6. Coping with the Cold – Conclusions (1) • Heating systems should only be modernized in high-density areas where DH is cost competitive • Block heating and building-level solutions based on natural gas may be feasible if home owners can organize themselves • Targeted subsidies may be needed to avoid welfare losses for the poorest DH costumers if tariffs become cost-reflective

  7. Coping with the Cold – Conclusions (2) • Policies and investment framework must allow poor people to opt in or out • Targeted vouchers for equipment and possibly fuel may be promising instruments • In bigger networks lifeline tariffs can be effective • Targeted subsidies may be needed to avoid welfare losses for the poorest DH costumers if tariffs become cost-reflective • Network investments must be coupled with metering and control options

  8. Ongoing WB EE Projects in CEE • Lithuania (GEF) • Poland (IBRD and GEF) • Croatia (IBRD and GEF) • Romania (GEF) • Bulgaria (GEF) • ESMAP project in Poland

  9. Lithuania Heat Demand Management Project • Project launch: 2003 • $6.5 million: VE $2.5m and VCM $4.0m • VE Component (Dalkia): Heat regulation improvements. 75% support from Effective Energy Consumption Fund. Total planned investment: $34m. • VCM Component: Building envelope improvement through revolving fund with international fund manager

  10. Poland EE Projects (1) • Krakow EE Project (launched 2002) • Recipient: MPEC, Krakow • $15 million IBRD loan, of which $7.5 million for ESCO activities • Operation of utility based ESCO (POE) as subsidiary of MPEC • Targets public sector buildings in Malapolskie Region

  11. Poland EE Projects (2) • Poland EE Project (launched spring 2005) • Recipient: BGK bank and POE, Krakow • $11 million GEF Grant: $7 million for guarantee facility, $2 million for POE ESCO investments, $2 million for TA • Work through participating banks, guarantee coverage: 50-70% • Active pipeline development and support to energy audits.

  12. Romania Energy Efficiency Fund • Launched 2003 • GEF Grant of $10 million: $8m for EE investments and $2m for TA • International Fund Manager • Debt financing only (co-financing) • Targets direct financing as well as TPF through ESCOs

  13. Bulgaria Energy Efficiency Fund • Launched Summer 2005 • GEF grant of $10 million: $4.5m partial credit guarantee, $4.0m debt financing, $1.5m TA • Co-financed by $1.8 million from GoB and $5.75 million from bilateral donors (tbc). • Fund will be flexible employing debt finance or guarantees as needed • International Fund Manager

  14. Russia Municipal Heating Project • $85m IBRD loan onlent to 5-9 city governments • General system rehabilitation • Investment support, TA and institutional support • Trend towards introducing building-level substations • Private or quasi-private operators have replaced municipal companies in a few cases • Project is ongoing and completion is expected by end of 2007

More Related