1 / 13

Roe v. Wade Grutter v. Bollinger

Roe v. Wade Grutter v. Bollinger. Lauren Bauschard. Roe V. Wade. Decided in 1973 Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger. Roe v. Wade. Texas law made it a felony to abort a fetus unless it was medically advised.

ashton
Télécharger la présentation

Roe v. Wade Grutter v. Bollinger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Roe v. WadeGrutter v. Bollinger Lauren Bauschard

  2. Roe V. Wade • Decided in 1973 • Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger

  3. Roe v. Wade • Texas law made it a felony to abort a fetus unless it was medically advised. • Roe who was unmarried and pregnant filed a suit against Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County. • She argued it violated her rights in the Fourteenth Amendment under the Due Process Clause which is to protect certain fundamental rights against government action.

  4. Roe V. Wade • Roe filed suit against Wade, district attorney of Dallas County to challenge the law outlawing abortion. • State court argued that is is a policy best left to the legislature to deicide. • A three- judge federal district court ruled the Texas abortion law unconstitutional • The case was appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

  5. Roe V. Wade • Outcome: The Court decided that a right to privacy under the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution extends to a woman's decision to have an abortion • The Supreme court invalidated any state laws that prohibited first trimester abortions.

  6. Roe V. Wade • I agree with the decision made by the Supreme Court. A woman has the right to her own personal privacy and decisions.

  7. Grutter V. Bollinger • Decided in 2003 • Chief Justice: William Rehnquist

  8. Grutter V. Bollinger • University of Michigan Law School denied admissions to Barbara Grutter, a white student with a 3.8 GPA and 161 LSAT scores. • Petitioner alleged that respondents discriminated against her on the basis of race in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 • The law school used race as a predominant factor, giving applicants belonging to a certain minority group a greater chance of admissions.

  9. Grutter V. Bollinger • At the District Court Level it was decided that the admissions policies were unconstitutional they clearly considered race. • The Sixth Circuit Court of appeals reversed the decision by referring to the Bakke decision and the use of race could be used towards diversity.

  10. Grutter V. Bollinger • After going to the Supreme Court it was decided that the United States Constitution “does not prohibit law school’s narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse body” • It implied that affirmative action should not be allowed and that a “colorblind” policy should be implemented. • Therefore, University of Michigan Law School admissions program that gave special consideration for being a certain racial minority did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.

  11. Grutter V. Bollinger Opinion • Academic performance and character should be more important criteria for admissions than racial identity. • Students cannot define their race but they can define their worth. Race is not something that students are in control of and should not be judged based on it.

More Related