1 / 8

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact Assessment and Evaluation of YEAR 1 OUTCOMES ( Implemented 1 and/or Project

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact Assessment and Evaluation of YEAR 1 OUTCOMES ( Implemented 1 and/or Projected ). 1 Levels at which Implemented ( i.e., F=Freshman, S=Senior). CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge.

atalo
Télécharger la présentation

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact Assessment and Evaluation of YEAR 1 OUTCOMES ( Implemented 1 and/or Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum ImpactAssessment and Evaluation ofYEAR 1 OUTCOMES (Implemented1and/or Projected ) 1 Levels at which Implemented ( i.e., F=Freshman, S=Senior)

  2. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge • To be able to measure CRCD Intelligent Systems project curriculum impact, over time, on students’ Design Knowledge, benchmark measures were taken for: • Beginning Freshmen • Freshmen Ending 1st yr and also for • Seniors Beginning 1st semester of Aero Design • Seniors Ending 2nd semester of Aero Design • An adapted version of the TIDEE Team-Based Design Knowledge Assessment Test and Scoring Rubric was used to measure • Engineering Design Process • Teamwork • Communication.

  3. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge:Team Design Process, Teamwork & Communication1 Freshman vs. Senior Baselines ( Early Fall 2001) Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge *Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. 1 TAMU AERO CRCD Adapted TIDEE Project Mid Program Assessment Instrument #1, Design knowledge

  4. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge : Freshman Benchmarks Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge *Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. * .**Post Test was given to a different set of Freshman

  5. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge : Senior Benchmarks Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge *Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. *

  6. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge Gained in a First Semester Freshman Engineering Course • The TIDEE Team-Based Design Knowledge Assessment Test was given at the beginning of the first semester in a Freshman Engineering Class which incorporated a CRCD Intelligent Systems project. • The TIDEE Team-Based Design Reflective Essay was given at the end of that same first semester Freshman class . • Both measured knowledge of: • Engineering Design Process • Teamwork • Communication • First semester Freshman knowledge about engineering team-based design increased after completing their Intelligent Systems team projects (e.g. “Stiquito Projects”)

  7. CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge Gained in a First Semester Freshman Engineering Course Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge Pre-Test Pre-Test Pre-Test * *Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted.

  8. CRCD Intelligent Systems Class Design Projects Increased Freshmen’s knowledge about Engineering Team-Design Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge *Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. Pre-Test Pre-Test Pre-Test *

More Related